• SONAR
  • [SOLVED] Which of these equates to lower latency? (p.3)
2015/06/24 17:21:18
brundlefly
I used to run an E-MU 1820m interface. Around the time I acquired it, I got the impression from somewhere that Creative/E-MU stuff operated best at 48kHz. I did some testing, and didn't really see a clear performance or stability difference, but the argument that 48kHz allows for a less aggressive slope on anti-aliasing filters that is easier to get right and potentially less damaging to the raw input signal made sense to me so I figured I might as well go with it. But more importantly... the math is easier when doing conversions. 
2015/06/24 17:40:25
charlyg
brundleflyA much quicker way of finding the correct Manual Offset is to measure the actual round-trip latency using the free CEntrance ASIO Latency Test Utility (https://centrance.com/downloads/ltu/).

 
It says it can' measure it. I took left output if 2i2  and connected to left input.. turned down volume, ran program, and it fails.
 
In strep 3 of the help it says this.....
3) Select the device driver you would like to test from the drop down menu and select the input and output
channels you have physically connected together in Step 2. and yes I chose Focusrite Scarlett  ASIO
 
There is nowhere to select input and output channels?
 
 
2015/06/24 18:02:52
brundlefly
charlyg
turned down volume
 

 
If you mean amp/monitor volume, that's okay, but don't turn down the interface output volume or you'll silence the "ping"!
 

There is nowhere to select input and output channels?
 

 
I believe it sends and receives on all channels, so it doesn't matter what's connected to what so long as there's a closed loop somewhere.
 
 
2015/06/25 19:38:14
KyRo
Thanks, all.
© 2026 APG vNext Commercial Version 5.1

Use My Existing Forum Account

Use My Social Media Account