Because of the bugs in the staff view on X3, X2 and X1, (X1 was a disaster, no doubt) I decided to buy Digital Performer 8 for Windows. I started the 3rd movement of my 9th symphony on Sonar, ported it over to DP and used it every day for 2 months. Very recently, I brought the piece back into Sonar Platinum. Here's why:
1. Cakewalk came through and fixed the most egregious notation view bugs, including the snap bug, the screenset refresh issue, and the order of tracks in the staff view track pane that got jumbled. Hurray for Cakewalk!
2. While DP's notation is better because it can properly display tied and dotted triplets and 64th notes, in reality Sonar's notation VIEW is better for me. DP's notation editor simulates 8.5 x 11 manuscript paper. While this is good for songwriting and for pieces that have no more than around 6 instruments, once you're using 10, 20 or 30 instrument tracks, it becomes cumbersome because you can only see 4 or 5 measures on a page. For playback this isn't an issue, but for composition, editing and orchestration it is, because you're constantly moving from one page to another, which I don't like. With Sonar, the notation is laid across the entire width of the screen, and it has a scroll bar (DP does not) which for orchestrators and composers of large pieces, allows you to move around the score very easily and quickly. Sure, you can use memory and markers to get to a specific measure, but when you have a composition with 200 or 300 measures, having the scroll bar and the notation spread across the entire screen is invaluable. I didn't realize how important this is until diving into the program and spending 8-10 hours a day learning it and using it.
3. DP is a great program. But the fonts are too small for me. The event list in particular is so small that it really is hard on the eyes after working for 3 hours or so. I have 20-20 vision with glasses, but still, I found some eyestrain due to the small fonts and the lack of color coding in the event list. Checking for errors is more difficult and inserting controller and patch changes is a little bit more difficult on DP. Sonar's ability to rename controllers and patches (MOTU had an editor that can do that, but not for Windows) also makes the event list easier to use to correct any MIDI programming errors.
All in all both are great programs, and there is nothing I can do in one that cannot be done in the other. But for this composer, Sonar is simply easier and faster to use. I am happy Cakewalk finally got around to staff view fixes. Though the tied triplet issue is still around, since I export all my scores into Sibelius, it isn't too big of a deal because Sonar plays back these tied and dotted notes correctly. If Sonar fixes that, no doubt many composers will see how far Sonar has evolved.
Jerry
http://www.jerrygerber.com