Personally i feel the OP has a point.. in prior Sonar upgrades, there were real, tangible improvements in functionality, and when Splat appeared, my view was "is that it?" and so I pretty much saw it as $149 for AD2, and for the first time in 6 years delayed my upgrade as i did not see a valid rationale.
Previously, Sonar was pretty much guaranteed to be stable and solid by April/May of the following year in its current incarnation.. (which was why i updated in May) never perfect of course, but a clear well known status.
So now, having recently upgraded in May from X3e to Splat D, with install issues, bugs and within 2 weeks the E release (needed for at least one bug) there is already yet another release E1 fixing issues related to the new E release, so i am at 3 installs in a 4 wk period... 5 months after Splat was launched.. the very scenario i wished to avoid
This is not how i wish to proceed.
At the end of the day, I have absolutely zero interest in a subscription model that drip feeds new features and new bugs along with old bug fixes. This has the byproduct of forcing multiples ongoing updates and reduces both confidence and stability in my studio system
which leaves me in a pickle...
Of course I do not need to update to the F, G, H I etc however as new bugs can (and are) being drip fed with updates, then the pickle is that at any time i choose not to continue to get the "latest and greatest" release, i can very well be left with recently introduced bugs...
and i dont like pickles....