Personally, I think the Bakers may be relieved that they can get fixes out faster and reduce the amount of sharp criticisms from any oopses. I like the more scrummy-type incremental rollouts.
The only thing I wish CW would do is maintain a locked forum thread detailing one page of all the updates since X(4) was released, subversions, patches, etc. and then possibly add links under each version/subversion/patch that takes you to another page/thread detailing the fixes, improvements, etc. I'm used to seeing (networking) companies, such as Cisco Systems, who show all versions, create PDF docs of each one's Release Notes, and then point out deprecated versions, stable versions, latest version, bleeding-edge, etc.
I think it's valuable to see the iterations. It used to be a sign of bad work to show many Rev's in product lines, but in today's software worlds, especially Apple's software, swift and frequent updates and revisions are welcome. I think it would be quite helpful and proud to show the iterations of the latest Sonar on one thread page. It could potentially help people keep track how far behind in versions they are (assuming the name/versions were cross-reference-able)