This apsect I locked onto like a starving man on the last hot dog on earth. I "assumed" the audio microscope was locking out that band (which it is for replacement purposes), but if one tries to "tame" a kit piece, I am not seeing a way to do so. With the Wet/Dry global (not by "band" module), I cannot find a means to re-introduce the remainder of the kit other than to lower the wet enough that the piece I am trying to tame comes right back.
 
So far I am seeing this more as a "layering" FX to add content rather than a means of reducing anything (i.e. have to make the replacement frequency mask the underlying drum so that the rest of the track is usable). I do not want to lose the entire kit because I dive the base volume down. I was hoping to see a wet/dry based on band being used (allowing the rest of the underlying kit to pass). Is this possible?

Not at this time with a single instance of the plug-in

Thanks scook. I wanted to make sure I wasn't missing something.

Don't be shy about entering a feature request.

Arachnaut already did 

mettelus
This apsect I locked onto like a starving man on the last hot dog on earth. I "assumed" the audio microscope was locking out that band (which it is for replacement purposes), but if one tries to "tame" a kit piece, I am not seeing a way to do so. With the Wet/Dry global (not by "band" module), I cannot find a means to re-introduce the remainder of the kit other than to lower the wet enough that the piece I am trying to tame comes right back.
 
So far I am seeing this more as a "layering" FX to add content rather than a means of reducing anything (i.e. have to make the replacement frequency mask the underlying drum so that the rest of the track is usable). I do not want to lose the entire kit because I dive the base volume down. I was hoping to see a wet/dry based on band being used (allowing the rest of the underlying kit to pass). Is this possible?

Yea I was wondering about that.
It needs a second gain for the pure sample to balance with the wet/dry?
If I understand you right.
 
Edit: I must read and type slow lol

Each replacement track has a level and pan maybe it was thought that in conjunction with a global wet/dry would be sufficient.

The level affects volume, not gain.
Being able to raise the floor without changing freq would make it register softer hits, in my beer-fogged brain atm lol.
Then the dry/wet could tame the noise and level balance the output.
I have a ton of old bad recordings I'd like to run through it, but many are just too soft.