Earwax
Sanderxpander
I still don't understand why you would want to. Freeze or bounce is much quicker.
Actually, it's impossible for any other method to be "quicker" than real time recording. When you stop playing, you're done recording. And, brundlefly's response exactly mirrors what most people wanting to record "live" want to do. If I'm playing music on an instrument that I'm interacting organically with as I play it, I want that emotional performance and all of its nuances captured "live" and immediately. If I choose to edit it in some fashion after the performance is captured, that's fine. Some people are interested in capturing a MIDI performamnce. Others are interested in capturing an audio performance. Different mindsets, I guess.
Question.
IF "Actually, it's impossible for any other method to be "quicker" than real time recording"
how WOULD one pre-process an audio signal on a DAW so that one could, for example
record their voice, hear reverb on that voice before the actual signal, and hear their "realtime"
guitar accompaniment with pre-delay?
Crickets?
The answer is there IS no "REALTIME" on a DAW. There is only "faster than
I can hear",
synchronized by the magic of
Sonar.
We get DELAYED audio and video(usually 3 sec.)
24/7 from our flatscreen feeds from our local cable service
(I'm told for our own good),
and we all play along.
I believe the Bounce function of SONAR
beats that on an avg. length song.
What's the big deal?
midi is not realtime so a
softsynth cannot be realtime
if
midi is used for input.
Yet we get on with making great music anyway.
Not Realtime. Relative. So is music.
Premise is moot;
Sonar provides five thousand ways to make your music
FEEL realtime. That matters.
You are simply arguing flavor.
Loop an output to an input and be done with it.
Peace.
Mel