Kamikaze
Ahh cool, then my vote is for fewer IRs, No loops, synth or ProChannel presets, and amps. Just focus on programme features.

 
+1 and bug fixes.

benjaminfrog

Kamikaze
Ahh cool, then my vote is for fewer IRs, No loops, synth or ProChannel presets, and amps. Just focus on programme features.

 
+1 and bug fixes.

+2 and although not exactly related to Sonar, adding a Polling feature to the forum would allow members to vote on issues like this one.
 
Walt

But do remember that content is developed by different people than those who work on the core program. So content doesn't take away from program development, and vice-versa.

For those of us that struggle with the intricacies of creating sounds from scratch, presets and loops as a starting point are invaluable. One of the values of a convolution reverb is the ability to load an impulse that otherwise might take you (read me), many minutes, or longer to create. I rarely, if ever, use loops but I have no problem with having to download and install hundreds of MB's of them so others can use them in Sonar.

FWIW,  I like loops and use them when they're called for.  However, I do wish that some of the loops were less "electronic" and more natural takes on non-processed content.  For example, steel guitar licks that most people do not have access to or some nice organ patterns.  Just sayin'...

Anderton
But do remember that content is developed by different people than those who work on the core program. So content doesn't take away from program development, and vice-versa.

I'd prefer more people working on the programme development and less on content. Less content more features. *staff view, cough cough*

+1

Kamikaze
I'd prefer more people working on the programme development and less on content. Less content more features. *staff view, cough cough*

Not everyone at Cakewalk is a code cutter. It may not be a good idea to have people who don't code for a living work on program development.

scook

Kamikaze
I'd prefer more people working on the programme development and less on content. Less content more features. *staff view, cough cough*

Not everyone at Cakewalk is a code cutter. It may not be a good idea to have people who don't code for a living work on program development.

Yeah obviously, I don't want the canteen lady anywhere near Pro Channels. I'm saying employ more code cutters and spend less money on getting features from other employees and 3rd parties.
 
 
EDIT:As the thread will reveal

I say great update.. That's it.