My general observations of "Big Name Studios" is that they almost never use a PC for audio. Most of them are using Mac dual/quad xeons, esoteric HD3 systems, 2 inch tape, and lots of Pro Tools. Many of them use the converters in their SSL, AMEK, MCI, or whatever in their $500k mixing boards. Quite a few use modified systems with upgraded conversion by Burl, Apogee, Lynx, Prism, ETC... .
Most everything named so far is just not in the same league. I am not dissing anything as I use a PC and run both Sonar and Protools, but I have never heard of a "Big Name Studio" that uses Sonar or PC's for primary audio tasks. I'm sure there may be an exception somewhere, but this has been my experience.,
Knowing this, I have tried to make my studio as "pro" as possible without breaking the bank. Since my use is primarily for singer/songwriters, I don't need a ton of inputs. The room you record in is everybit as important as the equipment. I have a fairly nice room plus a dedicated vocal booth. Signal path is generally Neuman, Custom made U87 clones, Audio Technica, Shure... etc into a ADL700 dual channel tube pre, into a Lynx Hilo AD/DA converter that is interfaced with a V Studio 700 system. I use the JBL LSR monitor system and some old school NS10's for monitoring. This is as close as I am gonna get! I'm not a big name studio but this signal chain is pretty good.
You might check out the UA Apollo as a interface. It works fine with Windows and has gotten rave reviews. There is also a new Prism interface that is a scaled down Orpheus.
The Focusrite system noted in a previous post is pretty nice and can be upgraded at Black Lion Audio for under $600 with some really sweet Burr Brown Converters.
YMMV... The most critical component is the musical input and the song. That is what really separates the "Big Name" Studios.