A true stereo FX unit will affect the side that gets the input only, unless there is a feedback loop between channels, such as with a delay. Even so, this thing does not behave correctly, even though I like the quality of the algorithms. Bloody annoying, actually.

Nomad Factory Blueverb can accept stereo input, why not a plugin that is many years newer and supposedly better? 

I'm listening to Pristine Space at the moment... I'm using my very own true stereo convolution files and I have it patched for true stereo.

It's on a bus I named guitar.

I made the bus so I could insert Pristine Space there.


I took a guitar track and panned it hard LEFT.

I am sending it to the guitar bus with Pristine Space.

I listen to the 100% wet out put of Pristine Space and I have a "reverb" of the guitar in both speakers.

I listen to the 100% dry out put of Pristine Space and the guitar is only in the LEFT speaker... a condition I confirmed by powering off the left speaker.




That's what I meant before... that's what I just checked and confirmed.

I am not sure how it applies to the OP question... but I think it describes what one should expect from a True Stereo reverb effect.


I didn't buy Breverb so I can't comment about it.


best regards,
mike

A true stereo input will correctly yield sound on left and right, but how much on each side should vary with the input location...

I have only used Breverb once or twice and had not yet noticed this... A very common digital flaw is that while creating a stereo image at output, many programs and devices sum the l/r input... Sad... Even worse that something as highly touted as Breverb should be so "crippled"... <sigh>

Keni

If it is a convolution reverb I'll buy the "reverb in both speakers" thing. But this is not using impulses AFAIK, therefore it should be far more flexible.

Not quite what you're looking for but the reverb output itself can be panned using the two sliders beneath the output fader.

The word "reverb" has an actual definition.

It seems like you are trying to redefine it.





Please excuse if I am mistaken about what you are hoping for.. but do you really just want a reverb effect in one speaker? That's not "reverb"... but of course I can see why someone might call it that.

Do you want to "Pan" a reverb effect?

If so, insert it on a track... and then pan the output to where you want it... just like it is the reverb built in to a mono guitar amp when you pan that to a side. 

Or just pan the output of the reverb bus.

best regards,
mike

Yep, that I know, but if one uses it as a central ambience in a mix you can't pan it unless you want to affect all the instruments sent to it.

What I am looking for is to be able to pan the aux send from a track to some degree and have the output of the reverb reflect that. As in placing a source in a space, but using that same space for other sources, as an example (many uses for this feature, actually)

LJB


A true stereo FX unit will affect the side that gets the input only, unless there is a feedback loop between channels, such as with a delay. Even so, this thing does not behave correctly, even though I like the quality of the algorithms. Bloody annoying, actually.

Nomad Factory Blueverb can accept stereo input, why not a plugin that is many years newer and supposedly better? 

I don't fully agree. What you describe would be like having two independent mono-reverbs panned hard left and right.

My opinion is that; if you send a signal panned hard left into the reverb, it still just should be a placement within the space the reverb creates. Reflections should still be created to the right, but the placement of the dry in-signal (in this case hard left) should affect both color and volume of the created reflections in the whole virtual space.

I tried softtube's reverb that comes with the mix bundle and this works as I'd expect from any stereo reverb. Using FX-send to a bus with this reverb, panning the send left and right and listening to the bus solo, clearly pans the placement of the wet sound. I don't know if it just affects the volyme of if it actually changes the frequencies of the sound too though 

mike_mccue


The word "reverb" has an actual definition.

It seems like you are trying to redefine it.





Please excuse if I am mistaken about what you are hoping for.. but do you really just want a reverb effect in one speaker? That's not "reverb"... but of course I can see why someone might call it that.

Do you want to "Pan" a reverb effect?

If so, insert it on a track... and then pan the output to where you want it... just like it is the reverb built in to a mono guitar amp when you pan that to a side. 

Or just pan the output of the reverb bus.

best regards,
mike

Mike, thanks for that. Seriously, I am not an amateur, and I know what I want. It's not a difficult thing.


Sincerely,


L.

True stereo is Stereo in & out.
2 stereo ir's are needed. You can mix & use different types of stereo ir's too which can be useful.