• SONAR
  • Whoooaaaa!!! Is Breverb really Stereo? This bothers no-one else? (p.3)
2013/01/28 12:22:59
Loptec
mike_mccue


I'm listening to Pristine Space at the moment... I'm using my very own true stereo convolution files and I have it patched for true stereo.

It's on a bus I named guitar.

I made the bus so I could insert Pristine Space there.


I took a guitar track and panned it hard LEFT.

I am sending it to the guitar bus with Pristine Space.

I listen to the 100% wet out put of Pristine Space and I have a "reverb" of the guitar in both speakers.

I listen to the 100% dry out put of Pristine Space and the guitar is only in the LEFT speaker... a condition I confirmed by powering off the left speaker.




That's what I meant before... that's what I just checked and confirmed.

I am not sure how it applies to the OP question... but I think it describes what one should expect from a True Stereo reverb effect.


I didn't buy Breverb so I can't comment about it.


best regards,
mike
I think the OP use an FX-send to a bus that's got only the reverb and it's set to 100%wet. And then panned the FX-send on the track.

Not sending the whole track to a bus with a reverb as an insert-FX letting through both the dry and wet signal

2013/01/28 12:23:47
The Maillard Reaction


Something you said caught my attention... so I just went and adjusted my Pristine Space to mimic Perfect Space.

In other words I reset it as a 2 Channel insert instead of using the True Stereo patch.

Now it works exactly as you seem to wish to use Breverb.

The guitar is exclusively on the left in both the 100% wet or dry.


The point being... I think that, in fact, you may NOT want to use a True Stereo reverb on this occasion. My test with Pristine Space suggests to me that you have described Breverb results as that of a True Stereo process rather than as the more mundane dual mono... which is what I think you are after for your current task.


all the best,
mike


2013/01/28 12:25:10
LJB
Loptec, you got it.

Reverb on Aux. 100% wet.
Send panned at will from the track.
Voila. FX slanted to the side of the pan.
2013/01/28 12:26:00
The Maillard Reaction
LJB


mike_mccue


The word "reverb" has an actual definition.

It seems like you are trying to redefine it.





Please excuse if I am mistaken about what you are hoping for.. but do you really just want a reverb effect in one speaker? That's not "reverb"... but of course I can see why someone might call it that.

Do you want to "Pan" a reverb effect?

If so, insert it on a track... and then pan the output to where you want it... just like it is the reverb built in to a mono guitar amp when you pan that to a side. 

Or just pan the output of the reverb bus.

best regards,
mike





Mike, thanks for that. Seriously, I am not an amateur, and I know what I want. It's not a difficult thing.


Sincerely,


L.





Hi Ludwig, I know exactly who you are!!!


I hope the explanation above will be helpful.


I can't speak about True Stereo off the top of my head... so I had to go think, and test, and come back with admittedly awkward explanations.




best regards,
mike


2013/01/28 12:28:27
LJB
Uploading an example now. Will post it asap.
2013/01/28 12:28:27
The Maillard Reaction
Loptec


I think the OP use an FX-send to a bus that's got only the reverb and it's set to 100%wet. And then panned the FX-send on the track.

Not sending the whole track to a bus with a reverb as an insert-FX letting through both the dry and wet signal





Right... I was agreeing with you...  I was just pointing out that we were both speaking about 100% wet on a True Stereo output... and then someone came along and said "No".




best regards,
mike
2013/01/28 12:30:35
LJB
Hehe. apologies for getting hot-headed. I sometimes marvel at how annoying such a thing can become - esp when you're 95% down the line a big mix and then have to replace the key reverb with another plugin! 
2013/01/28 12:32:50
LJB
Here's a link to a crude example I just made: https://soundcloud.com/on...erb-send-example    Done with Blueverb.
2013/01/28 12:34:21
Loptec
LJB


Loptec, you got it.

Reverb on Aux. 100% wet.
Send panned at will from the track.
Voila. FX slanted to the side of the pan.


I think the only solution would be to use another reverb, unfortunately =/

Well.. Actually... There IS another solution.. But, well... Here we go:

Create two reverb-buses:
ReverbLeft - Pan the output hard left
ReverbRight - Pan the output hard right

Then on each channel you want reverb on, you create two aux-sends; one to each of the reverb buses. You can now control exaxtly how much signal you want to send to the left or right reverb-bus


edit:
I mean.. If you really like the sound of the reverb, it might be worth trying :)
2013/01/28 12:34:44
The Maillard Reaction


:-)

It's all good... I know your work is serious... I can imagine the potential for stress.



all the best,
mike
© 2026 APG vNext Commercial Version 5.1

Use My Existing Forum Account

Use My Social Media Account