Seth Kellogg [Cakewalk]
We took into account the exact problems you mentioned, when designing the new model. A lot of us have experienced this type of headache in the past and we didn't want to potentially expose our customers to it. The assumption that we're just going off a Machine ID is false. It's not reliable enough.
Ok, look - I'm not trying to be argumentative here. But I think this is significant because it's now on the buyer to TRUST CW that the activation process is reasonable etc.
So the first time I ever have an "issue" with the activation server being down, or I get a bounce because I did (???) that caused a flag to go up - and you're going to have a very pissed off customer.
That's cool - I have a very high opinion of the efforts CW is going thru to serve customers. But there is now an additional "cost" to me (maybe small), and you have to prove that this system is robust.
>>The assumption that we're just going off a Machine ID is false. It's not reliable enough.
I hope "reliable" means "reliable" for the customer, yes?