Anderton
forkol
Also, tbh, what I have seen (so far) in the initial release is a lot of cosmetic or small features, and not stuff that really gets my blood pumping.
I dunno. Mix Recall is extremely useful, it's a feature from the early days of automated digital consoles that I thought was never coming back. And VocalSync isn't just for dialog to picture - it's great for doubled vocals and harmonies - and the cheapest equivalent I've seen costs $140 more than the complete Platinum upgrade by itself. The customizable Control Bar is fantastic, the MIDI timing drag feature means goodbye Fit Time...I posted my first thoughts on the new features in this post. But don't forget you'll also get the new features that come out in the next 12 months, like Drum Replacement (which has already been mentioned).
Hey Craig, thanks for the reply. I don't disagree with you, but it just does seem kinda small RIGHT NOW. I mean the last go-around we got Melodyne and Addictive Drums (for some of us who really waited, we got AD2) all for the same upgrade price.
Also, I've already developed work-arounds for some of these that I think I'm actually going to like better anyway. For the Vocal, if I'm doubling or harmonizing (rare in my case) I'm probably going to use my full Melodyne OR MHamonizer. For the mix settings, if I'm not sure, I copy a project and save the settings. The MIDI drag is probably useful, but a good audio drag (AKA better Audiosnap) would be more useful to me. As for drum replacement, I do that rarely, but when I need it I go the route of either splicing audio and/or combination of Audiosnap-to-midi conversion.
I know these features are really useful for pro and semi-pro, but for my own home use, I can't yet justify this purchase. That's why I am gonna wait maybe a year or so and see what the bakers can roll out.
forkolIt will be interesting to see if other DAW providers try it.
Anderton
It puts them in a difficult position in some ways. For those who have been planning to go to a subscription/rental model, that now looks kind of selfish compared to a model that lets users keep what they buy. And if Cakewalk's model is successful, it will provide the resources needed by the company to really pour into SONAR.
You are right. Problem is, there's a lot of competition out there, and I'm starting to think there's too much, and there's gotta be a fallout coming in the DAW marketplace. The resources that are needed to develop a world-class DAW are formidable. I really don't see much movement in the marketplace. You've got the big names (Pro-Tools, Cubase, Ableton, Logic) reigning supreme, then smaller developers like Bitwig, PreSonus, Sonar, FL Studio, Reaper, etc left to fight over the remaining marketplace. I don't really see any of the smaller developers really growing their market share that much, mainly because once you have chosen your DAW, it's mighty hard to consider switching, and it will usually cost a lot to get a user to switch. Now, I own a few other DAWS, mainly because I got them at a good price, but I can assure you that I will NOT pay multiple subscription fees for all of them at the same time.
I'm just not sure if this will really be 'successful' in gaining new customers, more than it might help to even out Cakewalk's revenue stream. The one thing that would have helped to be able to get new users, i.e. a sale, doesn't look to be an option anymore.