Sweet Tooth
And the Belittling sets in, True Colors which is surprising for a man of your stature.
Well I said I wasn't going to come back, but I didn't realize you were going to jettison your argument and start another one that's not even relevant.
And yes, I may have stature, but I'm a human being and I don't like having my friends and associates called liars when they have done anything but, as demonstrated even by texts you've cited. And I don't like the way you've treated other people in this company, and I don't like your violations of the TOS. I don't believe in fighting, but I believe in it if someone is attacking innocent bystanders.
You don't respond to logic, you don't respond to patience, and you don't respond to facts presented by others and even yourself. So I thought I'd try belittlement, which at least worked strategically because it made you reach for something that undermined your arguments further, just in case anyone thought we were dealing with someone who didn't have his mind made up and came here to push an agenda, not learn the reality of a situation.
As stated before, there is no single form to the subscription model. Here, I'll try to spin the same article my way...
"It is typically defined as an annual or multi-year software license that combines the right-to-use the software with the rights to obtain software updates and service."
Sounds like what Cake is offering.
Well you did try, once more you didn't succeed because yes, I read the article. Sorry, but it's all about what happens during the time a customer is using the software. It does NOT mention the term of the agreement, what happens after the terms expires, or how it expires. So it has nothing to do with what you've been talking about up to this point.
You make a statement, are proven wrong, and then without acknowledging that you were either incorrect or misinformed (even if you're the one who demolished the merits of your own statement), try to move on to
another statement which then has to be proven wrong on its own merits. I've just done that again. You're welcome.
I'd like to have a civil debate maybe even philosophical. IMO Cake is telling a half truth which in effect is a lie, for reasons that are beyond me. I'm sitting here waiting to toss money at them, I mean heck its only $10 a month.
And that is why you will never have a civil debate. You have already made up your mind, and continue on an ever-more desperate attempt to try and justify that opinion, even if it flies in the face of citations that you yourself make. It is not possible to reason someone out of a position they did not use reason to attain. You are calling Cakewalk liars, yet have produced no evidence whatsoever that anything they've said is not true. What you
have done is produce evidence that proves they're not liars. Thank you for that, and good night.