lump sum

I'm pretty much set in my mind to not subscribe at all.
 
However, I would think the lump sum would be best because it is cheaper. Also, once you pay, then all you have to do is sit back and wait for $149 to $199 worth of updates each year.

kitekrazy1
 Too bad I can't make it a poll.  I'm on the fence between the two.  I'm usually a pay $149 type courtesy of Mr. Visa or Mastercard.
 
 Your thoughts?
 

I wish we could have polls, but at any rate I'm paying total upfront.
Walt
 

in 2 minds, depends on marketing.. lump sum or nothing.. if they want to offer specials later next year like they have done in the past over they years, then I might bother. if thats done and dusted , then I'll wait as long as possible or not at all
 
I've not updated a rival's product this year as I felt they offered too little vs what they charged. I waited for a sale on another company and upgraded their thing, and I'll see how I get on with it.
 

It's an ongoing business cost for me, so the cash difference between the two is absorbed into the general mess of that. I'm tempted to do the monthly payment out of sheer curiosity.

It's an ongoing business cost for me, so the cash difference between the two is absorbed into the general mess of that. I'm tempted to do the monthly payment out of sheer curiosity.

I'll pay in one lump sum. I think most of us are used to upgrading every year anyway, so the payment itself is really no different than it used to be. I like the idea of not having to worry about payments throughout the twelve months and knowing that all of the new updates will be ready for me. 

Lump sum here

kb420

kb420

Lumpy Dumpy,  stupid as a rat! One lump sum.