I mean no disrespect.
Assumption: the OP is a new CW customer, fur shur, a new X3 user.
'Tis a clear an inverse relationship: the less something costs the more is expected.
Not sure why I am repeatedly amazed at the expectations that something that costs next to nothing
and is as powerful as Sonar should provide complete handholding.
Warning: Proper use of this product requires significant frontal-lobe development.
Chief Architect: $2,700 Training: 2 days in vegas: $700
(Training assumes experience with the program. Close to architect-level education.)
Black Baud accounting: $6k+ Training: 500-1000 per day.
And $2.5k renewal per year.
How much did you spend to purchase Sonar? Your computer? Sound interface?
And you did not read the manual? To find the tutorials?
And you have not clicked the sticky labeled, "Helpful Sonar videos?"
And you have not searched the forums for such information?
Before admonishing the dudes who created the program for you to complain about?
--------------------------------------------------------
I still think Sonar costs less than a 1/4 of what it should. It is way too inexpensive. And
consequently those who should have purchased Music Creator, or M-Audio Vocal Studio,... are
confronted with a longer learning curve than expected because of their inexperience. And they have the audacity to blame the CW dudes for the frustration they experience at not being able to just understand and use the program right out of the box without reading the instruction manual.
Business dudes know, there IS a direct relationship between low product price and high support costs.
Higher price, fewer users, lower costs, higher profits.