AlanPerkins
You guys are going to scare away the new buyers :-)
I agree with what James has said,
They already own it and a lot of us are taking this one opportunity to help them look things over and maybe, just maybe, fix all those dang bugs that drive us nuts FIRST before doing anything else. We really don't need more features, we need stability.
I think each and everyone of us is 100% thrilled that we do have a continuation of our quirky, beloved Sonar.
Look how many of us refused to switch even though it was a dead duck for a while.
The new owner, Meng, has come on this forum from time to time so we have his attention. Why not take the opportunity to make a list of common nit picky stuff we feel need to be addressed.
Half the stuff listed is just user error,, but even those items give you insight into what is expected from the software. Why do the errors happen? Maybe a simpler interface would be the answer and so on.
Even though the title and the content of this thread come across as possibly a negative dark cloud when everybody is feeling so happy about the continuation, I still feel it's actually a positive move on behalf of the long time users to not have the downside of Sonar swept under the carpet.
Lets bring it all into the open and be honest.
Sonar COULD become the best with the correct TLC.