mariogag
... bandlab business model that is really in an opposite direction to the current DAW market.
I don't really think it is opposite. It has been a different strategy for doing
SOME of the things that we have been doing with DAWs. And maybe 10 years from now, all music -- even Grammy-winning recordings -- will be recorded, mixed, mastered, and distributes, all in the "cloud."
But today, I think it is completely out of the question to do studio-grade mixing and mastering with a cloud-based approach. With today's algorithms, you need to pass a whole lot of data, and that just isn't possible on the networks available to most people. But there are plenty of useful things you CAN do in the "cloud." And most of these relate to the creative end of the cycle (as opposed to the production end.)
I'd like to think that Bandlab has recognized this reality and that is why they were willing to pay for the Cakewalk assets and commit to producing a desktop app (which will probably be practically the same as SONAR in its first release.) Think of the Bandlab work flow as being creative and collaborative on the cloud. And as the project starts to take shape, it flows to the DAW for final production.
And it wouldn't be one way. The commercial-grade product that emerges from the DAW can seamlessly be distributed on the the various Bandlab channels.
Think of the DAW as being a key tool in a bigger system.