• SONAR
  • Audio interfaces with Sonar X3 (p.2)
2014/09/24 16:30:27
Sylvan
The UFX can also use DSP FX busses for zero latency monitoring with FX like reverb and delay. You can also use DSP compression and EQ for monitoring on any channel or inject it directly into the recording chain.
 
2014/09/24 21:07:09
Geo524
Focusrite 18i20 gets my recommendation for best bang for the buck. Lots of I/0, 8 awesome sounding mic pres, HiZ input for guitar and bass, 2 separate headphone sends and mix control software. Oh yeah and rock solid stability with Sonar X3 Producer. Not a single hiccup since I've had it.
2014/09/25 00:30:35
AT
Yes, it depends.  More inputs and/or outputs mean more money; less inputs and outs for the same price (usually) means higher quality.  I got the Tascam and it has really great converters, I could hear some difference w/ my TC Konnekt 48.  But the preamps really shine. Much better than the TC built-ins or any built-ins I've heard.  I usually use RND Portico or Warm Audios here at home - the Tascams were as good, just different, which is saying something.  They don't crap out and have enough gain and are very clean.  The 7000 has all the limitations Craig talks about and no inserts or midi.  But if you just want a stereo in/out and record acoustics, you are set to go.
 
But if you need more ins/outs, you aren't really missing out on too much quality.  It is there, not so much in conversion (you really have to be finicky to spend $600 on converters - there ain't that much difference), but in the preamps.  A good preamp is worth having, esp. one w/ transformers if all your others are IC.  But again, not necessary if you don't stress the built-ins.  I've heard/made plenty of nice sounding songs w/ a very basic interface.  If you need 8 channels you can get one of many models for about the same price as the Tascam (or Forté or RME or Audient) and do drums until the cows come home.  The room and the playing and the mics and arrangement will have a bigger impact on sound quality than conversion, or even preamps. 
 
What is nice about the Audient and RME is you can add 8 channels via ADAT.  So if you need more I/O you can add that in the future and still get the "premium" package today.
 
It just doesn't depend upon the money you want to spend anymore, it depends upon what you want to record.  I went for the Tascam 'cause I don't use more than stereo, and if I do, I can use the TCK 48.
2014/09/25 00:34:28
musichoo
The first question is, what is your budget?
Second question, how many inputs do you need?
 
2014/09/25 01:41:01
maltastudio
Sonar X3e and Yamaha 01V96i.You can do a 16 track 48khz 24bit Band recording even with a I3 Laptop SSD HD.
Peace
2014/09/25 23:33:15
chuckebaby
focusrite IMO, best pres' great sound and easy to work with.
not only that but they are on top of their drivers constantly.
 
watch out for the audiobox, you get what you pay for.
2014/09/25 23:48:47
sock monkey
I own the Focusrite Scarlett 6i6 and it's fine for the price point, I bought it for the good drivers. But I find the pre amps are way to touchy. Almost respond in a sluggish kinda way. Very hard to get levels perfect so you have to compromise and turn it down more than I'm used to with other pre's.  I think my Tascam us1641 has more robust pres.  So there you go, to each there own. 
I also use a Yamaha 01V ( the original) , via the SPDIF  which works much better than straight into the Scarlett. Not sure if Focusrite uses the same pre amps on all it's interfaces. 
That Tascam UH 7000 does look very appealing for what I do.  
2014/09/26 01:34:30
Vastman
Sylvan
Vastman
I can... Focusrite Forte... Exquisite, less money...mic pres are heavenly...




I am not sure that comparing the Focusrite Forte and the FireFace UFX is the right thing to do. They appear to be completely different interfaces meant for different use. Have you seen the feature set on the UFX? I am sure the Pres on the Forte are excellent, but I think bang for the buck, the number of ins and outs, and overall feature set would weigh in favor of the UFX. Just an opinion as I have not had personal experience with the Forte. But the UFX has delivered solidly for my very demanding commercial clients and has not let me down.
 
I record live acoustic drum sets along with real amps all at the same time so for me, I need a lot of ins and outs. The UFX has been a dream, handing all that with no problem, allowing me to send independent headphone mixes to each musician while I monitor my own unique mix. I am unaware if the Forte has that capability.


Which I guess gets back to the queries of many... what ins/outs/needs does pdarg have...
Mine are very basic... solo songwriter, do all my own music/vocals, and dumped all my outboard gear (into my basement) years ago...
 
We operate in different realms, but after owning many relatively high end pieces, the Forte is bliss... awesome vocal capture, amazing DI for bass/drums, and elegantly simple... blows the doors off my ole emu/saffire pro24dsp, and a few others.
 
On first reading, I felt pdarg's needs might be similar... however, who really knows as he has been hyjacked by the Scook/Alex invasion force...
2014/09/26 13:52:30
gswitz
Hi. I have an rme ucx. I got a price of 6 or 7 hundred less than list, so shop around. Advertised price doesn't fluctuate much.

I have several videos showing me working with my rme linked in my signature.

Love it. It is portable and you can use 3 Rme interfaces at the same time together.

Really, if I lost it, I'd have to replace it with another rme. I could never go back.
2014/09/26 14:06:43
mettelus
An "open" question asking about audio interfaces is akin to asking about religion! To be honest, it is better to research on 1) your price point and 2) you I/O needs first, then narrow that down to a select few and ask. As for me, Focusrite has a feature that they should market, which is ASIO aggregation (meaning multiple devices can use it at the same time). To be honest, I am not sure if they are "best" (and honestly do not care anymore), since I can run multiple programs through my Saffire at the same time... no issues, no crashing. The MixControl is nice (once you understand it), but being able to seamlessly run several programs (SONAR, Melodyne stand-alone, Audition, etc.) through the Saffire has sold me on them for life. (The Scarlett line is the USB version of the Saffire, which is FireWire).
 
I totally admit that I am a "fanboi" of them now, but the "shock" of ASIO aggregation was such a pleasant surprise that I will not forget the experience.
© 2026 APG vNext Commercial Version 5.1

Use My Existing Forum Account

Use My Social Media Account