• SONAR
  • More Pro Channel modules..please (p.3)
2014/09/21 10:04:15
FCCfirstclass
+1 for more Pro Channel modules.
2014/09/22 05:50:35
chilldanny
It would be damn shame if Cakewalk have no plan to expand on the Pro Channel concept, and limit the introduction of new modules only to new versions of Sonar.
 
Why waste time effort and resources developing a really poor iOS app like Scratchpad when the devs could've cooked up something for the Pro Channel instead?  Sure, we all have our preferences and ideas on where Cakewalk should focus their efforts.  Granted.


The FX Chain module is quite possibly the most important development for the Pro Channel thus far, but I can't help but feel it provides an easy excuse to limit further module development.  Channel Tools for instance.  I think it's great that Craig took the time and effort to share his rather brilliant work around.  But unfortunately, as with so many other things in Sonar, it's exactly that; a work around.
 
For clarity...
  • Channel Tools
  • Signal Splitter
  • Time based processors
…are what I'd really love to be developed for the Pro Channel.
 
Please 
2014/09/22 08:33:26
ston
gustabo
How about a per module preset save/load option???



This gets my vote!
2014/09/22 09:38:49
Paul G
gustabo
How about a per module preset save/load option???


Yes, please!
2014/09/22 09:55:09
ltb
thomasabarnes
I 2nd the notion to get a module for PerfectSpace, but also we need PerfectSpace to be native x64.
 


according to Aleksey Perfect space x64 isn't going to happen
2014/09/22 10:39:44
Elffin
nooooo! Perfect Space X64 is a must!!!  Give him anyything he wants!!!
2014/09/22 11:19:31
chilldanny
Given their links with Cakewalk in recent years, perhaps we'll see a version of Overloud's REmatrix (a multilayer convolution reverb) included in Sonar as a replacement for Perfect Space?
 
A Pro Channel adaption of that would be incredible.
 
http://www.overloud.com/products/rematrix.php
2014/09/22 15:47:53
Sanderxpander
Apart from the Softube suite I believe I have all ProChannel modules and apart from an occasional console emulator I don't really use it. I don't like the lack of presets per module, I think the way of inserting modules is eye candy and really very annoying (I can't even see my whole list clearly due to the huge icons), I can't remove the EQ, nor can I add a second one, the flyout is pretty but confirms to me that you really generally need more space for an EQ, BReverb2 misses functions in the PC, the list goes on and on.

It's just not a timesaver nor a practical thing for me. Some people rave about fx chains in the PC but the time spent setting them up is way more than they're worth for me. It's pretty quick double clicking an effect in the bin. I know this is not a popular opinion on here but I swear I have a point here; I wish they would seriously revamp/revise some basic prochannel features before adding more modules. I might use it more if it weren't ultimately limited even in what it claims to do.
2014/09/22 16:43:24
chilldanny
Each to their own, we all have feature preferences 
I do agree with the majority of your points however.
 
 
© 2026 APG vNext Commercial Version 5.1

Use My Existing Forum Account

Use My Social Media Account