ptheisen
By the way, are you still planning to port AZController to Reaper?

That is the plan... for this year. Full version will take a lot of time, but I do not exclude some partial port first.
 
For the parser:
* presets cleared (down to chunks required to build Reaper FX blobs, there are still some questions but they are actual only for the other side...)
* strip parameters (level, pan, phase, gain, mute). Noel has mentioned someone had problems with that. I have no idea why.
 
I must admit that for parsing binary formats some "matrix" skills are required. I mean the person should be able looking and HEX representation recognize doubles, UIDs, lists, arrays, maps, etc. But that is not SciFi, there are more people then just Neo and Trinity which can do that
For casual listeners, music is also just a pleasant (or not) sequence of sounds. Other immediately recognize style, harmony, rhythm, instruments, amps. Down to problems with mixing and mastering. And no-one say they are "cheating" or violate "listening EULA" because they hear all that details. I am not so good in music, but I am from the HEX world.

I've gotten into the habit of converting all of my MIDI files into WAVs and doing the mix using all WAV files.  This way it doesn't matter what DAW I find myself using years from now. I might have different plugins, but I'll always have the WAVs.
 
John B.

Well here is the agreement...ula or eula..agreement...to use the licence if you click yes and install...That part is in agreement of the user of the software and code for the tools.
 
Where it also goes grey and between the lines...If you did not agree to the EULA or install their licence...
 
Now the grey area is...If you have a cwb or cwp file...Given but do not own the rights to licence or agreement of the agreed use of their code....Can you retrieve the Music that does not belong to be held captive in a container bottle, it is put by the agreed upon use by another...but not the one who wants to export it out to another software their music , of which CW cannot hold as bound or binding as theirs...or in any way prevent it from being owned by the music maker...being a user...not necessarily the user of said agreed agreement.
 
So grey it is....if you seek to sell...and you nibbled any code, if trade agreements are not totally in agreement in other countries...grey areas....Then...it is grey, but CW cannot hold bound in format, what does not belong to them, as claimed...they cannot own, nor bind the file, if the one making the program to unbind...did not agree by clicking...I agree.
 
 
Even if they change the agreement...don't read it....another grey area....lol
 
I think Aslow3 has the right attitude...and wants to help his way.
 
I said some smart kid would come.....Well worth the wait....and so refreshing to see...
Imagine if he / or someone liken..was working in the CW camp bake...things might be so different today.
 
Now about law, and living things...with words about life time updates for a product of usery licence....my life, and those bakers,company workers...sure flew, and still live...breaking my agreement.....and using a grey area....did not honour my agreement.
 
Go Aslow3!
 
Cheers.
 
 

PSS...donations are not payment...so another grey area might be a path...or freely distributed for...again so many grey areas.
 
not because it is hard...but because some can do...and if they love what they do , just to do it because they can...why stop them?...to the moon and beyond?...a president once said...?...question is was it hollywood made>?<grey areas eh?...yeah greys...but let it not stop us from doing good works because it is the right thing to do...is give because it is in us to do also...hope!
 

Another grey area...if you or anyone else, if something is said dead...raised back to life if bugs occur in future...to continue the fixing processes of a life time user's use, not forth coming from the bakers and agreed usery of licence paid life time upgrades for fixing bug issue on so said OS it is supposed to work upon...if change occurs of said OS, which renders the usery unusable....nibbling a codex to fix not steal or pirate..leaving only a credit onto further life of a product of life time updates made by a living entity for users ...is not a crime!
 

embellish
verb  em·bel·lish  \ im-ˈbe-lish \
Popularity: Top 40% of words |Updated on: 19 Dec 2017
TELL US ABOUT YOURSELF





TRENDING NOW:surrogate motherfurloughpopinjaylibelSEE ALL


Tip: Synonym Guide 
Examples: embellish in a Sentence
Editor's Note: Did You Know? 

•   
•   
•   
•    
    

Definition of embellishtransitive verb
1: to make beautiful with ornamentation : decorate 

a bookembellished with illustrations

2: to heighten the attractiveness of by adding decorative or fanciful details : enhance 

embellished our account of the trip

Words, and the use of them....Truth be told...Stay on track...no lies, no liars...And no worries!
 

Righteousness...another word of the day...you know lawyers must uphold..the people's best interest...not the thing!
 

By their own agreement made dead....then the agreement also is dead to life time updates...is impossible to make dead....life...it is always a living thing....So to honour it they must!...or it goes to enhanced by another, is totally legal, if paid for those terms, does not matter who does enhance or embellishes to keep it working as agreed by the payment for to use that licence...longevity is with the agreement of user with living entities!!!!...life, they should not of used that word in any agreement for usery to honour fixes for, to use a legal term for company or product having none!...I expressed this when being promoted...and the ideal of bribery...showing a misleading...look what we are working on...to bait in for cash...could be fuel for fodder....so legal...and terms of agreements..bound by words...meaning is grey....life has not been defined properly, nor is it all proper working yet....reminders of definition..is not determined by corp or lawyers babble...it is defined by Linguistics of bound meanings of known meanings founded by people living for use the meanings of....do not make yes mean no...or good be bad, or bad be good..to suit the self interest...when sold to masses to use in agreements for...if it is to be used upon..under licence agreement of paid to use for life of user, gaing fixes for paid up front by agreement to get done by the agreed parties!
 
I agreed to life time updates....so did they!...I was in understanding this product to be Cakewalk...not Gibson, which is not withstanding, in my agreement of use of cakewalk products sold or bound under these agreements...life has nothing to do with dead things...product has no living attributes under that meaning for life...it is defined only by living entities having life or death...."Principle"....another word!

Now if Gibson owned this company..and murdered it..yet holds their and our user interest at bay....not honouring the agreements to carry over onto what they say is owned by them as code paid for life time updates...the licence is also owned by user under agreement to have life time updates which were paid in advance forwarded for life of usery of user licences paid for!...fixing any bugs in, and any to come by change of os or updates of other in machine or parts drivers or other things of the machine the codex works or kind of works upon , yet has bugs, or bugs are in to needs constant fixes for!.As has been witnessed since its conception as needing!..By law of their own words owned, and agreed upon...so the licence is bound by those agreed, and the third parties not held but own or are tied there in bound of said agreements!...user should not walk away to another signage or port over ...but stand as user, and force the Principle!