ston
Did the splitting of the clips create any orphaned notes (notes which extend either side of the split point)?
Sonar 'goes a bit mental' in this circumstance. It just doesn't handle orphaned notes at all, i.e. I do not think any code has been written to explicitly manage this. I say that because the software makes no attempt to ask any of the pertinent questions to the user which it should: "Do you want to truncate the note(s) to fit within the new clip, split the note(s) between the clips, or extend the clip(s) to incorporate the orphaned note(s)?"
I've seen Sonar exhibit really bizarre behaviour when creating orphaned notes by splitting clips.
OP's talking about audio clips, whereas it appears you're referring to MIDI. I don't want to hijack the thread, but I'll just say for the record that I'm not seeing a problem with splitting MIDI clips. What you get depends on the setting of Non-destructive MIDI Editing in preferences:
- With it off (my preference), SONAR will leave any notes that cross the split in the earlier clip, and the later clip will start with the first note after the split point. In this mode, the sound of the track is totally unaffected by the split. Initially it will look like the clips are overlapping in the same lane, but after toggling lanes, the later clip will be shown in a new lane.
- With non-destructive MIDI Editing enabled, the notes crossing the split get truncated by slip editing, and the later clip contains only notes that start after the split as before. The reason it's non-destructive is that either clip can be slip-edited back across the split to restore the full length of the truncated notes. But unless you move the split to a point where no notes are truncated, the track is going to sound different. I usually want to preserve the sound above all else, which is why I prefer the "Destructive" mode.