Nick, I more or less agree with what you're saying here. But I don't think CW is "putting all its eggs in one basket." I see this as part of the evolution of the CW line towards a post-Sonar product, what you called DAW 2.0 and what I called a while back a "post-DAW DAW." Here's my take on the Project5 announcement.
http://forum.cakewalk.com/tm.asp?m=1712646&mpage=1&key=#1712750 ORIGINAL: Nick P
Cowtowing to the typical geetar/bass yahoo who uses Sonar in his basement will only get you so far. How many more years will these guys pony up the $180 or so for the Sonar upgrade?
Again, I agree with much of the point you seem to be trying to make. But the problems with Sonar aren't rooted in the instruments played or the kind of music made by its user base. There's something about the regular references to "geetar" players and so on that makes it seem like you're slumming to be here among such yahoos. On the basis of what? I gather that you're a formally trained musician. But why should that impress anyone?
The reality is, you're here, using these products, and complaining about these products, and calculating whether or not to upgrade these products, and trying to figure out what it means when they kill these products off. The fact that you can apparently play suma that fayancy music reeeel purty on a pieyana doesn't change that.
We're all yahoos on this bus.