"Not that complicated. When this forum was created, Cakewalk’s previous owner allowed a space to discuss other products. Bandlab has continued that tradition."
Perfect. I totally understand having a section called Other Products Discussions. Makes sense to me. Just would expect it to be in a designated let's all discuss this if you're interested area.
I log into this forum several times a day and always peruse to find things that others have experienced with Cakewalk by BandLab. I am certainly not trying to limit other peoples' discussions of other topics. It just strikes me that it is like going to Ford's website and reading about Chevy. Ok. I get that, providing it is made clear and there is a designated area for that, I suppose. With all that said, I am just a lowly user who has been with this product since the 80's so as always I go with the majority and hope for the best. Hmmmmm wonder if the other daw sites discuss Cakewalk. Nawwww...don't have the time for that. Interested only in my tools.
I guess it took me back when I saw some of the posters as those using Studio One. That works for me if it works for you. BUT, I kind of got the feeling that is was more like
stuff this up your nose kind of posts. Maybe I read it wrong. Maybe they are by Cakewalk users in disguise. So be it.
I will continue visiting and learning as I read posts that are pertinent to my daw, Cakewalk by BandLab.
Thanks for the responses.
Oh yeah, except for the sarcastic post:
"...Are you also going to post the same in similar threads about REAPER, Cubase, Traction, Samplitude and on and on it goes, or is Studio One the only one that has you feeling insecure?
And I'm pretty sire no one was forcing your mouse to click on the thread . . . self control is a wonderful thing when you learn how to use it..."
I won't print my response to that one here.