Using this loop-back method to stack FX in the UCX, what is the latency?
RME
How much Zero is Zero?
From a technical view there is no zero. Even the analog pass-through is subject to phase errors, equalling a delay between input and output. However, delays below certain values can subjectively be claimed to be a zero-latency. This applies to analog routing and mixing, and in our opinion also to RME's Zero Latency Monitoring. The term describes the digital path of the audio data from the input of the interface to its output. The digital receiver of the Fireface UFX can't operate un-buffered, and together with TotalMix and the output via the transmitter, it causes a typical delay of 3 samples. At 44.1 kHz this equals about 68 µs (0.000068 s), at 192 kHz only 15 µs. The delay is valid for ADAT and SPDIF in the same way.
So at 44.1, latency is 0.00024 seconds.
at 192, latency is 0.000045 seconds.
The reason I have tripled the numbers is that I'm describing a scenario where you
pass 1
bring the signal in on the analog inputs and
out through the ADAT outputs, and SPIDF outputs
pass 2
back in through the ADAT inputs and
out through SPIDF outputs (merging with pass 1 direct to SPIDF signal)
pass 3
In from the SPIDF outputs
and out to the mains
The timing of your parallel tracks will be off by 0.000068 seconds at 44.1. I can't hear it.
The SPIDF out doesn't have any phase dangers because you send the whole mix through it.
The biggest benefit of the SPIDF loop-back is that you turn your single 3 band parametric EQ into a 9 band parametric EQ at the cost of 0.000068 seconds at 44.1.
You can use the SPIDF loop-back without the ADAT Loopback. So, if you are recording 16 channels, you still get 9 bands of parametric EQ...
Lastly, the parallel compression thing can get tricky if you forget to align the pans between the input and ADAT channels.