Grem
But it may not be developers fault. Someone somewhere wants to keep the software tied down to prevent pirating. This way they control what happens to the installation files.
I do not believe that all this is in conjunction with pirating and that the developers are so unblamable! Today there is just a trend to create these installation monsters and some developers and managers really believe that they make the users' life easier by hiding and obfuscating the installation details. And they believe that like that they have less support issues. But I am convinced that it is exactly the contrary! (as user and as developer)
paulo
They just kept marking the ticket as solved without making any comment.
What? I feel with you, this is really poor and disappointing!
paulo
I understand that some software may sometimes have been updated since the HD was sent out, but surely they could just make a patch rather than having to d/l the whole thing again?
Sometimes they download only a patch and use the disk, too. But most of the time the code seems to be so poorly organized that they have to download mega-patches or even the whole thing.
But in general, why not let the user decide? There are 1000s of users out there running much older versions!
By the way, today I found another problem with the installation. Some of the Reaktor Players (Prism and Spark) were not registered properly. It seems that they have not properly managed the dependencies. Again, I had to use another of their help programs to fix the issue. So I really wonder what's the benefit of this "intelligent" installation garbage called Native Access? I am sure that a "hand"-installation would have been much more pleasant.
Marc