abacab
If I want to control a plugin I usually just click midi learn and wiggle the one I want. Done.
That:
a) become quite annoying fast, even for someone who does not really "mix". The problem with MIDI learn (apart leaking to tracks/synth with "unpredictable" effect MIDI messages) is binding to particular track. I mean if you want quick set compression on several tracks, you need to learn every time
b) corresponding MIDI messages are leaking to tracks/synth, with "unpredictable" result.
c) does not work well with endless encoders
Also for such use case, there are way to avoid midi learn. Sometimes called "Quick dial", when some knob simply control the last parameter changed (exists in AZ Controller, inspired by Automap and tutorials from Craig...)
Or maybe if I find a big enough pile of money lying around, I'll go all in on a NI Komplete Kontrol S Series and Komplete Ultimate!!!
... which is not going to help with controlling DAW and with 3d party plug-ins will work exactly like ACT Dynamic Mapping. No, I do not think the controller is bad. It has endless encoders and display, the combination which for some reason not so many products have (a perfect combination for controlling plug-ins). If only they could lower there own ago and "open" the controller protocol along with NKS software interface, that could be "to go" controller for everything.
Behringer is also "close" in concept with Motör. It has open protocol, more controls and motor faders. But no display...
Why all companies always "forget" something? And when something is about "right" (like Alphatrack, with motor fader, touch sensitive encoders, many buttons and display), it is declared "obsolete" and goes out of production...