ceemusic

John
I like to use the term buss in order to differentiate it from a city bus.

Many moons ago Nancy Allen @ LBCC gave me a simple explanation that I always remembered - "think of it as an actual bus, moving signals from one place to another."

Again read the whole thing. Copy and pasting stuff is silly here. Its selective while missing the most important part. 
Did you see where I said you were right? You're arguing for no reason.  

John

ceemusic

John
I like to use the term buss in order to differentiate it from a city bus.

Many moons ago Nancy Allen @ LBCC gave me a simple explanation that I always remembered - "think of it as an actual bus, moving signals from one place to another."

Again read the whole thing. Copy and pasting stuff is silly here. Its selective while missing the most important part. 
Did you see where I said you were right? You're arguing for no reason.  

Sorry, I don't get your anger.
Who's arguing? I just posted how I relate the term buss to a past experience.
 

Welcome to the club so was I. 
 
Edit to add: there was no anger in my post. I'm a host, I don't get angry.  

John
Did you see where I said you were right?

John, that's a different person.  Nobody is picking on you.  The only reason I know about "buss" is because I made the same mistake until somebody pointed out that I was suggesting kissing a motherboard.  It is just one of those linguistic hazards with English, along with imply/infer, flammable/inflammable, its/it's, fewer/less, affect/effect, and hundreds of others. 

And to complicate matters even further...enough people have used "buss" when talking about mixers that it's possible to run into it and think it's an alternate spelling, like the way British English says "colour" as opposed to "color." 

cparmerlee

John
Did you see where I said you were right?

John, that's a different person.  Nobody is picking on you.  The only reason I know about "buss" is because I made the same mistake until somebody pointed out that I was suggesting kissing a motherboard.  It is just one of those linguistic hazards with English, along with imply/infer, flammable/inflammable, its/it's, fewer/less, affect/effect, and hundreds of others. 

Something is wrong. We are talking past each other. My post just after yours was in fact relating my on view due to having a very different understanding. Yet in the end I agreed with what you were saying.  
 
I don't see how you were picking on me or any one else. If I thought that the results would have been very different. Further I happen to know your posting that there is no such thing as an electrical buss or bus is wrong. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/S-100_bus