Haven't seen this new "feature" yet as I'm stuck on Splat version from 12/16 as after that it screws up my 8.5 install.
 
Anyway, seems like just another silly bell, or possibly whistle, that makes a newbie go "oooh studio one doesn't have that, Sonar must be more better". 
 
it's all pretty pathetic how Cakewalk uses their resources. 

timidi
 
 
Anyway, seems like just another silly bell, or possibly whistle, that makes a newbie go "oooh studio one doesn't have that, Sonar must be more better". 
 
 

 
Except Studio One does have it and has had it for a long time, and instead of 5 entries in the list it has 10, plus the ability to have the list collapsed or expanded however you so choose by the way
 
Carry on

Matron Landslide

timidi
 
 
Anyway, seems like just another silly bell, or possibly whistle, that makes a newbie go "oooh studio one doesn't have that, Sonar must be more better". 
 
 

 
Except Studio One does have it and has had it for a long time, and instead of 5 entries in the list it has 10, plus the ability to have the list collapsed or expanded however you so choose by the way
 
Carry on

miss matron . . . so nice to have you back, but you're gonna get in trouble again, especially pointing out all the virtues of Studio One Pro 3, as compared with Sonar. Makes me wonder which DAW is ahead of the curve, and I thank you for coming here and pointing it out.

Not pointing out the virtues, just correcting misinformation
 
Doesn't really matter which is 'ahead of the curve', every bodies curve is different, as long as what you use does what you want efficiently and effectively to your satisfaction.

I like it.
I had made a request some time ago to replace the default (TTS-1) with a favorite, or most used (in my case Reaktor) as I had to click down a few trees every time to pick that.
I never used TTS-1 so the default was a waste of real estate.
I think this implementation is a fine solution.
 
 

"Not pointing out the virtues, just correcting misinformation
 
Doesn't really matter which is 'ahead of the curve', every bodies curve is different, as long as what you use does what you want efficiently and effectively to your satisfaction."
 
 
Can't not agree with that . . . but I've only always used Cakewalk, no experience with other DAWs, never had a reason to try out another one . . . still, it's nice to hear reports from the other side.

Matron Landslide

timidi
 
 
Anyway, seems like just another silly bell, or possibly whistle, that makes a newbie go "oooh studio one doesn't have that, Sonar must be more better". 
 
 

 
Except Studio One does have it and has had it for a long time, and instead of 5 entries in the list it has 10, plus the ability to have the list collapsed or expanded however you so choose by the way
 
Carry on

 
You are correct. Thanks.

noynekker
Can't not agree with that . . . but I've only always used Cakewalk, no experience with other DAWs, never had a reason to try out another one . . . still, it's nice to hear reports from the other side.

 
I've used ALL of them quite a bit, both Windows and Mac, except Reaper (although I did try out a version some time ago...it just didn't click with me).
 
The bottom line:
 

• They're all good.
• Their designers have different priorities, which is reflected in the feature set.
• No DAW will ever have everything you want.
• No DAW is bug-free, but whether that matters depends on if you use the feature where the bug shows up.
• Almost all DAWs have demo versions so you can see if you have good chemistry with a program's workflow before committing to it.
• ReWire is a beautiful thing.
• People should use the DAW where the designer's priorities match your priorities.

 
If only one DAW existed, I would make music with it. Nothing in any DAW I've used would prevent me from making music.
 

Anderton
Their designers have different priorities, which is reflected in the feature set.

• No DAW will ever have everything you want.
• No DAW is bug-free, but whether that matters depends on if you use the feature where the bug shows up.
• Almost all DAWs have demo versions so you can see if you have good chemistry with a program's workflow before committing to it.
• ReWire is a beautiful thing.
• People should use the DAW where the designer's priorities match your priorities.

 
If only one DAW existed, I would make music with it. Nothing in any DAW I've used would prevent me from making music.
 

+1

Anderton
Their designers have different priorities, which is reflected in the feature set.

• No DAW will ever have everything you want.
• No DAW is bug-free, but whether that matters depends on if you use the feature where the bug shows up.
• Almost all DAWs have demo versions so you can see if you have good chemistry with a program's workflow before committing to it.
• ReWire is a beautiful thing.
• People should use the DAW where the designer's priorities match your priorities.

 
If only one DAW existed, I would make music with it. Nothing in any DAW I've used would prevent me from making music.
 

+1