John
paulo
azslow3
The advantage of lifetime for those who have it starts NEXT year.
Correct. Those who have paid have yet to see any extra benefit at all, so everyone who took the offer has paid more for their updates thus far than those who decided that they were being asked to "pay twice" in the same year and chose not to take the opportunity. If CW goes belly up before that time, then all the people who bought into it who will be the ones that have dipped out financially, but that was the risk that came with the deal. You pay your money and make your choice and only time will tell if you made the right choice.
Well I got a free update this year due to the lifetime update. I don't get how you can say the above.
Brian Walton
Not true in all cases. Many users plopped down $170 (by buying lifetime updates through a 3rd party) with an older version of Sonar Producer and got years worth of updates with that money.
I am not speaking about ABSOLUTE prices (in previous CW politic the prices could be ridiculously different...), but there is common part: whatever method people used, they have payed MORE then was possible to pay just for 2016.
So no one "got a free update this year" from lifetime, everyone has payed for it in advance (just different price).
Platinum upgrades/updates before lifetime was (US prices) $100-$150.
Most "loyal" users have payed for the lifetime $99 extra (after updating to 2016, not instead). And so "comparable" with year membership according to the old schema.
I repeat, in previous marketing there was quite some "bugs" (most of which was called features, probably CW was loosing money... these "features" was not only for CW software). But I think that asking CW "please give other users the possibility to use old bugs in your system" is strange...
And I repeat, I am not against more users get lifetime. But let us be realistic (to balance, I can propose CW also be realistic... $250 for this year is not, at least so far).