• SONAR
  • Looks like Sonar has latency reporting issue. (p.4)
2017/06/12 03:44:07
muzdol
I think so too.
The vst which has lookahead can not be used parallel processing?
2017/06/12 06:07:19
Rob[at]Sound-Rehab
muzdol
I think so too.
The vst which has lookahead can not be used parallel processing?

If Sonar's internal PDC works OK, then this should not be an issue. Lookahead would be a fixed time in ms (fixed number of samples) which would increase your overall latency that you track against, but there is no reason for it not to work internally.
2017/06/12 08:57:44
muzdol
I know how it works...I think there is some issue on sonar's PDC function..
2017/06/12 23:42:28
muzdol
I think alloy 2 has different latency on different frequency band.. that's why i can't find proper sample number for trick.
2017/06/13 03:36:29
muzdol
1. alloy off - just playing AD2.
2. alloy on - Aux track with alloy, but all module off on alloy.
3. alloy with multiband - multiband comp on, but not compressed.
 
https://soundcloud.com/nicksohn/sets/phase-issue
2017/06/15 12:45:50
muzdol
No help anymore? :(
2017/06/15 15:45:34
pwalpwal
muzdol
No help anymore? :(

have you reported it? https://www.cakewalk.com/Support/Contact/Problem-Report
2017/06/15 18:30:48
Rob[at]Sound-Rehab
muzdol
No help anymore? :(



I got a PM from cakewalk regarding the problem report I submitted, saying that they managed to reproduce ... so there should be a fix soon, meanwhile do the freeze of delay trick ...
2017/06/15 23:02:32
muzdol
Yes, but no response.
2017/06/15 23:03:32
muzdol
Good news. But they know about alloy too?
© 2026 APG vNext Commercial Version 5.1

Use My Existing Forum Account

Use My Social Media Account