and you . . .
your reply to the other dude "Really?
Post #16 says something different." could quite rightly be construed as you are saying, 'really this says your talking $417"
then i just pointed out that what you linked to to back up your argument was from 2015, which meant perhaps the quote you were using to back yourself up with was prior to the feature being added, to which replied "
Yeah, I can read. Real-time recording is faster now?" to which i replied saying the other dude was correct, to which you replied "
I never said it couldn't be done. I'm asking if it's faster than the other methods." which by your comment "
Really? Post #16 says something different." could be taken as you were saying it couldn't be done, because that is what you were actually implying by that statement.
and i did contribute, i answered the question you asked about speed, and gave more info one one of it's main uses. as to the rest, taking into account that the written word may make emotions etc hard to guage, you get back what you give.
have a nice day
whbmk