Paul P
Guitarhacker
Since I have never used a tube pre..... perhaps this is simply a case of you don't know what you're missing if you never tried it.
I imagine one would also need a fair amount of experience listening to diffent qualities of preamplification to appreciate any fine differences. And have a room and reproduction system of high enough quality that they'll even appear.
Hi Paul,
Before I begin, I'm not picking on you.....but your post hits home and I felt the need to address it for others that may be thinking this way.
Firstly, quite a few would try to lead you to believe you need to know what to listen for in a pre. I don't believe this to be true. It either sounds good or it doesn't. The other thing to keep in mind is the sound you are going for. Do we always want dirt from the tube pre? Not always.....so, the question we ask then is "how does it sound just getting a good signal to disc?"
Chances are it's going to sound the same as any other pre sending a -6dB to -10dB signal....and if there are differences, how apparent are they and are they worth a costly hardware investment? Also, if we need a special room with the right reproduction, it drives my original post home even further. The only ones to hear this would be other engineers. Winner....marketing reps. See my points?
In the world of non-destructive audio with so many choices, I really have a hard time committing to a signal that is pushed destructively unless that is the sound I am going for. How many times will that happen depends on personal needs as well as clientele. So a guy like me is 9 out of 10 times NOT going to run any pre that I use hot enough to color destructively. With that frame of mind as well as the ability to come pretty close using uad plugs, it would be ludicrous for me to spend 2K or more on a mic pre. I have some good ones, but I get what I need out of Midas pres that are built into my console. They are not tube but they sure have received a lot of praise over the years.
Honest this hardware stuff is both a little snobbish and a lot subjective. But none of it is necessity other than for those that love hardware. It reminds me of the time I had a Manley massive passive, and an LA2A and compared them to the uad plugin versions. Was it exact....no, but it was close enough to where after 3 listens blindly, I could barely tell which was which. I sold both pieces of hardware and gained as many plugins as my uad cards could handle. A 2% difference that only I can hear which I can't hear any longer once you add in other instruments....and the answer was simple. Yes there are times stuff like this may be cool...but my advice is to not buy into the hype.....especially if you can't afford to. :)
Again this isn't really directed at you or anyone at all. I'm just discussing based on your post. There are no magic rooms or gizmos. We are involved in one of the most subjective, hyped up and misleading fields of all time. I try my best to ram that home whenever I can. :)
-Danny