• SONAR
  • VST2 vs. VST3 - an interesting observation (p.2)
2014/11/05 11:01:59
pdarg
Hi - sorry I was absent here for so long.
The plug-in is Voxengo's Elephant - the VST 2 version verses the VST 3 version.
I will try it again to see what happens, but the first test definitely yielded a quantifiable difference.
2014/11/05 11:25:18
John
That may be the reason. Elephant has an analog quality to it that might be a little random. I'll bet that if you do the same test with VST 3 vs VST 3 it will also not null. 
2014/11/05 11:42:56
pdarg
I will try it.
2014/11/05 11:46:16
pdarg
Okay - null test with two VST 3 files also yielded a difference, HOWEVER . . .
A visual check on VST 2 vs VST 3 shows a slight perceivable difference, but no visual difference between the two VST3's . . . the mystery deepens . . .
2014/11/06 09:57:06
Anderton
Can you load the same preset into each one?
2014/11/06 10:44:32
Karyn
I'm with Alex on this one.  If you can get just a single pair of VST2/VST3 plugs to null then it is definitely not an issue with Sonar.
 
As others have said, the VST "standard" is interfacing only.  The audio processing should be the same across the board.  If it's not, then it's the plugin writers fault/problem,  not Sonars.
2014/11/06 10:46:40
John
Pdarg well done.  Thanks for putting in the time to get to the bottom on this. 
2014/11/06 13:26:02
bitflipper
Have you run this by Alexsey yet? The guy's seriously the DSP guru to the DSP gurus. I'll bet he'll have an answer.
2014/11/07 19:34:15
Noel Borthwick [Cakewalk]
One obvious possibility is that the VST3 version is built from newer code and has some bug fixes that the VST2 version doesn't have :)
2014/12/03 03:48:16
BluerecordingStudios
I wonder how far is CW with VST3 implementation in X4...
© 2026 APG vNext Commercial Version 5.1

Use My Existing Forum Account

Use My Social Media Account