Okay CakeAlex I was using master tracks for a Commodore 64.
And syncing FSK (A homemade box a friend and I made the circuit board ourselves) to a Fostex 80 and recording my Commodore 64 tracks to it. I also had a TSR 80 Radio Shack computer that I mostly used for games. I have a couple hundred tunes with many tracks and I did them all in my own studio including playing and editing all but a couple tracks. I also have fifteen thousand Twitter followers, twenty thousand Tagged followers, five thousand Google plus followers and a thousand five hundred intimate Facebook followers.etc.
Google the words melodyne buggy and you will find 159,000 results
Google the words melodyne freezes and you will find 977,000 results
Google the words melodyne crashes can you will find 98,200 results
Then Google the word Melodyne and you will only get 422,000 results, not millions...
Google the word "v-vocal" and you get 122,000 results
Google the word autotune and you will get 6,420,000 results
Does that mean autotune is a better program than both V-vocal and Melodyne?
And I have never had "autotune" crash on me either.
getting the drift here?
Oh and there is this...
Melodyne Crashes - how I envy you other guys who say it works fine...http://forum.cakewalk.com...rks-fine-m2428190.aspx Considering I have spent over a thousand hours in v-vocal it does kinda make me an expert on the program and how it works.
It also gives me the golden ear to tell when another tune program is not cutting the mustard.
And NOW you know a producer who DOESN'T use melodyne...
I am not saying melodyne is useless nor am i saying it will never be fixed. But as of the other night it is still just a buggy as it was when I first tried it. And I am not happy with the way its tune works nor the clunky interface that is near impossible to use. And you say use it on smaller clips, well that is another SERIOUS drawback of melodyne. V-vocal also has a clip size limit. But I can usually fit an entire track full of lead vocals in it thought i prefer to break a lead vocal track in half or thirds. And by the time I am finished editing the V-vocal session is usually not so corrupted that I lose hours worth of work. There is also an advantage of seeing more of your vocal in one V-vocal session so you can see relative volumes of vocal words and phrases.
I am not just saying this to hear myself type, I have lost work in melodyne so often that it is not worthwhile using the program when V-vocal does a better job at TUNING and is actually MORE stable.
I also checked after the crash, the other night to see if it was updated and it is. I also don't have to buy the, err, "pro version" of V-vocal... To get the full functionality of v-vocal.And there are things v-vocal does that melodyne does not, not even the pro version. That kinda concludes it...
Take my advice for what it is worth. I am all set myself with a working version of V-vocal, (in fact while I have been here writing this I was taking breaks from this forum and edited three very long vocal tracks effortlessly and without a single glitch in V-vocal) and if Cakewalk programmers are reading this, please take this post as being presented with the best of intentions. THANKS