tlw
And got a remarkably good return on my 37 years long "investment". Certainly a better return than had I been responsible and put the money I spent on it in the bank like my parents thought I should.
Very few people that I know consider putting money into a bank savings account to be anything resembling a 'good investment'. That being said, here is the very blunt way to describe the point I was trying make above. If you're buying instruments that you intend to use as an investment, you suck at investing.
Is it possible to buy an instrument or some piece of musical equipment, hold it for 30 years and sell it for more than you originally bought it for? Sure. Let's look at the classic 80's dream synth, the Roland Jupiter 8. I absolutely LUSTED after that beast when I was 16. But at $5000 a copy, it was way beyond my means at the time.
These days the Jupiter 8 is still an in-demand synth and good condition well-used copies routinely sell for $8000-$10000 today. So if I had been smart, I would have bought one way back when for $5000, held it for 30 years and then I could sell it today for double the price. Great investment right?
Sure is. Until you realize that $5000 in 1983 ends up being about $12,000 in 2016 adjusted dollars. So while you thought you made money on your 1983 instrument 'investment', you didn't. You lost money. Just not as much as you would have lost on a bunch of other instruments of the day, Korg Poly 800 I'm lookin' at you.
And for perspective, that bad investment of putting your money into a corner bank savings account (and it is a bad investment) we were talking about? While interest rates are in the toilet these days, the average over the last 30 years has been about 5.6%. So $5000 deposited in 1983 and left to compound annually for 30 years would yield about $25k today. So yeah like I said, if you're buying an instrument you intend to use and thinking of it as any kind of investment, you suck at investing.