SilverBlueMedallion
Anderton
SilverBlueMedallion
What is that "Enable MIDI Output" option there for, when you see it doesn't do ANYTHING!
I can't actually believe after looking at my 4 steps you are still saying this is by design!! The checkmark actually DOES NOT DO ANYTHING!!! IT - IS - BROKEN!
How is that by design? What you are saying makes no sense now.... just anything to make this not look like a Sonar issue. Unbelievable.
What's unbelievable is that you blame me because you don't understand what a default is, what overriding a default is, what creates defaults, what a specification is, don't pursue links I provide that back up what I say, and then cross-post in other threads making idiotic accusations but never update the errors you make with correct information.
When I'm wrong, I have the decency to say so and give credit where credit is due because my concern is disseminating correct information. Apparently you have different priorities.
At this point, I honestly don't know if you truly don't understand, or whether your're willfully ignorant.
Please, turn the thread title from a threat to a promise.
Here is what I know.
The checkboxes in the SAME dialog box don't act the same. This is not the "norm" if you will. As I showed you in the video, if I select "Simple Instrument Track" or "Track Folder" or "All Stereo Outputs" - and then choose to never ask me again... those settings will always work when I insert a softsynth.... just not the "Enable MIDI Output".
If you can't see how that seems like a poor design, I don't know what to tell you. One would expect that if "Enable MIDI Output" is disabled and then you choose "never ask me again", NO synth you insert would have it's MIDI output enabled! It's like SUPER-simple. INFACT the checkbox works when you choose to ask every time! Seems kinda wonky.
Okay, now I know for sure: You're willfully ignorant. I provided a recipe that proves what you say in bold is wrong and I provided a link to back up what I said.
Oh and what about this.... is this a bug?
Now I also know for sure you don't read my responses, because I already replied to that - which supports the perception that you have no interest in a dialog. Your only response to anything is ultimately "It doesn't work the way I want it to work."
I can't let this go by without comment...
But I understand as a VP of Gibson, this thread could potentially sway new users away from a purchase, hence you have to make it look like there is no problem and its a user error.
If potential SONAR owners see this thread, they'll be very impressed with our patience. Then they'll check out the other forum threads, and think "Yeah, this is a pretty helpful bunch of people...well, except for a couple."
I have been a VP at Gibson for almost 4 years. I switched to SONAR almost 17 years ago. I have been using DAWs since the first Pro Tools. You will find no difference in what I've said about SONAR before and after I was with Gibson, except that I do bite my tongue a bit more to avoid seeming too enthusiastic about new features (besides, plenty of people here do it anyway), and I'm more critical of the program because now I actually owe something to the users beyond just helping out. I think most people here know that I advocate for the needs of Cakewalk to the users, and for the needs of the users to Cakewalk. That advocacy is not always positive, in either direction.
I have worked with Ableton, Steinberg (for whom I designed a plug-in), Avid, Magix, Sony, Native Instruments, Acoustica, PreSonus, Waves, and others whose names escape me right now. As a result I am proficient in all their programs. I don't complain about learning curves being difficult, I respect and admire that all these companies have made extremely deep and innovative programs for tiny niche markets.
Even when I was consulting to them, they knew upfront that SONAR was my DAW of choice. But they were mature enough to realize that it's my DAW of choice because
it fits my particular needs best. All software has bugs, workflow issues, legacy items in need of cleanup, sections that haven't been updated in years, etc. However, I don't have a sense of entitlement about it. I am very grateful for the fact that this industry has produced tools costing us a few hundred dollars that were worth a half a million not that long ago (and which required constant maintenance, by the way). I am thankful we have all these incredible tools at our disposal, warts and all. Despite your opinion that making a lot of noise and demanding attention will get results, you are wrong. It's not because of people like you that this rate of improvement occurs; it's because of the people at these companies and the people who actually learn and use the programs.
I urge you to download trial versions of other programs. It's insane that you're not doing that now - you said you were going to leave Cakewalk, so you better start learning some other programs in order to make good on your thread title.