slartabartfast
Software developers may find such a catalog difficult to compile, although one would expect that it must exist in order to guide their own repair efforts. It seems more likely that they believe that publishing such an easily accessed list would deter potential buyers, although I doubt many such buyers would invest the effort to find it, and some would no doubt be reassured that it evidences an ongoing commitment to ongoing support.
I'm not sure how it's done at Cakewalk, but at a company that shall go nameless, the list of known, confirmed bugs was around 500. However, many of them were so esoteric they'll probably never be fixed because no one cares that if you hold down the Alt, Ctrl, and num pad 5 keys at the same time while attempting to open a plug-in while 32-bit YouTube is playing in a 64-bit system, a window minimizes accidentally. So...then you get into "well, which bugs are important?"
What would be fun is if every company had a monthly Top 10 chart with the 10 most common/noticed/annoying bugs, with status (awaiting other fix, can't reproduce reliably, expected fix date, etc.).