brundlefly
How many lines of code in the MIR plugin vs. SONAR and all Cakewalk-owned plugins would you guess?
I have no idea. I do know that MIR utilizes over 5000 samples of various halls and rooms, and I know that what is different between the two companies is the concept of
service. I looked over my bug reports to CW and some are 5 years old that have not been fixed. When I email VSL regarding a question or problem, I always get a response within 24 hours, often much less. CW
might respond to an email 6 weeks after it was written and, as we all know, CW's phone support is pretty much gone. There's the software, and there's the culture of the people who make the software. The latter always impacts the former for better or worse.
I don't mean to be critical of such exceptionally talented, hardworking and good people, I know the economic conditions are always a pressure. But how about just devote 2 or 3 updates only fixing bugs, no new features, no new functionality, just repair what is already there? I can't be the only person who is saying this, each in our own way. When I get an update I don't think "wow! what else can I do with this software", instead I expectantly hope one of the bugs was fixed and new ones were not added. Sometimes too much is too much. When a DAW does the following really well, 1) record and edit midi, record and edit audio, handle plugins and is stable and doesn't crash, why not just create another program to do different things? Making a program so big seems to invite more complexity and more chances of errors. Please fix the bugs in staff view, the event list and giving MIDI the attention it deserves.
Jerry