@Mike You didn't waste my time. I learned a few things. How neccecery they were the future will proof. I would love that code you mentioned, could I use it to us my own external program? (Wavelab)
Or do you reccomend me to look in to Audacity?(also @charyg)
I wish Sonar would have the functionality or option for that (Just cause I like the bakers) Thank you .
@ Craig, Thank I will keep that in mind. Actually it is this client that insists. The material is intended for Youtube. He insists that youtube recomends your own AAC encoding as it should provide better results. I could find proof to backup his claims but those could be subjective. I have used Ogg Vorbis files in one or to occasions.
I wasn't aware it was gaining populairity. In my circles (yes they appear to be small) the AAC codec is the way to go an bla bla...
I actually encounter AAC more then MP3. I use to ignore it as much as pssible as MP3 is just fine/perfect for my (sometimes lossy) needs. But now I got forced in to it. And I refused to believe my lousy time consuming workflow was the way to go.
Happy I decided to ask for assistance:)
I woudn't mind to pay for this option tho. Actually I wouldn't mind to pay for good quality codecs as addons for Sonar. Like The Fhg Codec (tool). Cause it would improve my efficienty and the price/competitiveness etc. etc....
A while ago you asked if it was interesting to get more mastering functionality in to Sonar. Most people think of it as A Xtra special limiter or something... But I agree. This exaple is one of the Mastering abilities Sonar would benefit from. (Like having kmeters on every track, just for the ease of use. Or how about EBU complient metering per track complete with short and long term options stereo, phase, bla bla. When the tools are available the benefints are going to be more obvious to the most people.
I actually have AAC working on all my consumer devices, so I think it safe to assume pretty good compatibility. Ogg on the otherhand is only suported on Specific Smart devices or PC like devices. So I dunno how much of an alternative for MP3 or AAC. Is there something I missed?
@Scooc Thank you again. You saved hours of my time ;). I understand the need of the fee. I actually wished there was a fee I could pay to have the AAC codec export function. Or better yet include it at least in Platinum (cause its Platinum).
Your solution did save me money. It actually got me fired up on the ideas/options. You could now use an external encoder to upload a song to youtube without it taking an "hour".. right?
Ehem, As a certain forum member advised me;
I would like to impose on you to create a more elaborate command line that gives me more options.... Please :) . Or is there no such thing and would I need it integrated in the encoder? if so wich encoder should I use for these purposes?
AND THANK YOU FOR TAKING THE EFFORT and copying and pasting your command line settings. I pledge to be a more helpfull forum member.
I am curious on all your opinions on this AAC. Is my case individual, or are you guys also seeing a shift towards AAC? I noticed smaller file sizes and same better quality. So all is good, right?
And last but not least: Can anybody elaborate on Youtube a video containing AAC codec audio being better, as it not being have to be converted by the time efficient encoders of the big G?
Riz