jimkleban
Not sure if Channel tools is better.... i feel like i can control stereo fields better with 2 mono tracks. Don't get me wrong, channel tools is great if you want to additionally add delay for pseudo automatic double tracking but two mono tracks give me the feeling of more precision in reducing then moving the stereo field. I probably will be proven wrong here and I hope I am so I can learn something now.
Jim
I personally keep pretty much everything on the track side of my mixer in Mono and do any fancy stereo work on the busses (or these days in Aux tracks as needed).
Also keep in mind mono clips/signals can be outputted in stereo interleave for stereo effects. That is where Channel Tools can also be helpful.
AAAAAAND Channel Tools does Mid/Side processing as well which AFAIK is not possible on a regular track in Sonar.
In fact I'm pretty sure CT was Cakewalk's answer to the lack of on track dual stereo pan controls (as shown in OP's Pro Tools screecaps above) and M/S processing.
Can't be sure about that but it does seem like that's the modus operandi when the core program can't do something specific that others can (ie: create a plug/module scheme so as not to entirely disrupt the coding/workflow potentially leading to much bigger problems and/or the cost/headache of Baking such things directly into the main program).
meh... now I'm just blathering.
Also... I ain't no pro talking type dood.