All of the MOTU FW interfaces that I've seen suggest TI chipsets, and sometimes NEC.
In my experience, they are particularly picky compared to some other FW interfaces I've used (like Presonus), and even getting a TI card isn't a silver bullet, but it generally at least helps.
With my 828 Mk1, going to TI helped the interface performance, but didn't remove the frequent 828 reboots due to it just disappearing.
Others have reported that getting a TI chip totally fixed their MOTU issues.
So, it's worth a try, and they're not incredibly expensive, particularly with a board like the Ultralite.
Of course, it could be other things, like IRQ settings on the board in question, buffer settings to CPU power ratio, etc.
Here follows opinion:
MOTU driver developers prefer Mac. Of the two I've been around (Ultralite and 828Mk1, particularly the 828), their Windows drivers are flaky to say the least, and on 4 Windows systems over 4 years (for the 828)... both have been completely stable on the Macs they've been used on.
Here follows a rather extreme opinion:
I'm done with them, and won't buy another after the 828 dies or I get sick of turning it on or off for the drivers to pick it up (getting close to this one). In the 4 years I've used the 828, it's been the least reliable interface I've ever used, and their driver development for Windows has been laughable.
I know MANY others, however, who've had NO issues with them, and swear by their quality.
Here follows a little word of advice:
Keep copies of EVERY new driver you try with it, even over years. I frequently had to roll back to a less-flaky driver release when a current one was junk.
I'm really not sure what's up with MOTU, but I suspect that to some degree they test their drivers primarily on their extreme upper end and/or their newest hardware.
Take care,
- zevo