Frank-US
cparmerlee
dmbaer
The control room is not for everybody, so it makes little sense to force that option on users who don't need it
Here's another head scratcher, as in "WTF was Steinberg thinking?"
They don't do cross-fades automatically. In every DAW I have used, if clips overlap, the DAW automatically sets up a cross-fade -- because that's what a person would want to do 99% of the time.
With Cubase, the first clip overlays and silences the second clip!? I guess there are some non-default settings where you can get an automatic cross-fade, but only for a very short fade duration, not for the general case. If you want to do a normal crossfade, you must select all the clips involved, then type "X". That adds crossfades at all the overlay points.
Maybe you are looking for this?
"Cubase features an Auto Fade function that can be set both globally and separately for each audio track. Auto fades allow you to create smoother transitions between events by applying fade ins and fade outs with a length between 1 and 500 ms." Look at: Project > Auto Fades Settings
If you need crossfades that are longer than 500ms, you have indeed to trigger that by hand.
Best,
Frank
Yes, thanks. I just think it is really peculiar:
- That is is not the default behavior
- That it is limited to 500 ms.
OK, most cross-fades are probably less than 500 ms, especially if you are trying to make a smooth cut. But there have been many times that I have done cross-fades of a second or longer. It makes no sense at all to me for this to be limited arbitrarily to 500 ms. But it is just one of those things, I guess.
Overall, Cubase will get the job done for me. I am not thrilled with the included plug-in effects, especially that rather spartan UI in most of them. But over time, I have come to rely more on 3rd party plug-ins anyway, so that part of my world doesn't change much -- except for Melodyne, which really sucks in Cubase. If I have a project where I expect to use Melodyne a lot, I will be very tempted to use StudioOne instead of Cubase.
There are certainly some things that Cubase does that SONAR didn't do at all, so I am not unhappy. I just think Steinberg would be better off having a more open mind about things. But Steinberg probably has the same user base problem everyone else has. Those who are long-time users really don't like change and probably give the company some poor advice. Listening to the current user base isn't always the best idea. I'm not saying the user base should be ignored, but in a competitive environment, chances are good that some of the best ideas will come from outside -- and be strongly resisted by the old-time users.