JohnKenn
Under the impression that USB 2 is USB 2. Doesn't matter who makes it as long as the protocol is adhered to.
Presonus makes some good stuff. Experience is that USB 2 is more throttled than a hard wired card. Can increase the fire power of the computer, better OS, more RAM. Still can't compensate for the limitation of a USB connection.
Just trying to muddle through the next upgrade. Toss the delta card. Go with an i7 n'th generation chip. 128 GB RAM. Limiting factor being the USB bottleneck that chokes the signal flow worse than an ancient hard wired setup with a fraction of the processing power.
Hi John,
The quality of the USB-2 audio interface (and its driver) make all the difference in the world.
I run a RME Fireface UFX connected via USB-2.
Great low-latency performance
4.3ms total round-trip latency at a 48-sample ASIO buffer size 44.1k
To get lower than that, you need PCIe or Thunderbolt (running "PCIe via Thunderbolt" drivers).
I often leave my UFX set to a 48-sample ASIO buffer size.
If I'm working on a dense project, that might go up to 64-128 sample ASIO buffer size.
I never have to raise the ASIO buffer size above 128-samples.
MOTU's new AVB series are also great low-latency performers.
The Ultralite AVB connects via USB-2... while the larger AVB units have both USB-2 and Thunderbolt connections.
We have full "PCIe via Thunderbolt" support now under Windows 10.
You need one of the latest Z170x or X99p motherboards that offers Thunderbolt-3 via USB-C port.
You'll also need a Thunderbolt-3 (USB-C) to Thunderbolt adapter (~$84).
Currently, MOTU is the only company that has "PCIe via Thunderbolt" drivers available for Windows.
Other companies will surely follow... but full "PCIe via Thunderbolt" support under Windows is very new.
An audio interface with 24-channels of I/O is nowhere near saturating the USB-2 bus.
Even though some USB-3 audio interfaces are now available, they're not outperforming their USB-2 counterparts.
USB-3 certainly has more bandwidth than USB-2.
But... if you're not close to using all the bandwidth of USB-2, simply throwing more bandwidth at the situation won't increase performance.
Liken the situation to a car that has a top speed of 100mph.
Doesn't matter if it's on a 2-lane, 4-lane, or 8-lane highway... the top speed will still be 100mph.
If you're thinking about the first generation USB-1.1 audio interfaces, those were indeed terrible.
USB-1.1 didn't have the necessary bandwidth for a multi-channel audio interface.