paul jenkins
Or is it just me using sonar step sequencer wrong???.....In fruity loops and on the R24 the sequencer has measures running from right to left horizontally, and then the tracks are from top to bottom......In sonar its like you build a beat using the step sequencer, but you to do a inversion of that loop you have to save it and then modify it, and then reload it on a new track as a new loop etc etc, it seems really inefficient..........i love how in fruity loops(for example)You can patterncreate a loop, and then copy paste onto a new loop pattern with slight variations etc etc easily.....and create 5 different loops with minor variations, and then just paste the chosen loop variation into the time line............fast an easy
Sonar's step sequencer is in many ways an emulation of hardware step sequencers. It's not intended to handle audio loops at all, just MIDI. It's basically another way of using MIDI to control synths or samplers that has a few interesting tricks of its own. Like every row can send to a different instrument on a different MIDI channel, it can send all MIDI CCs, work with drum maps (which themselves can be used for more than just drums and more besides. It also has limitations, just like the hardware equivalent but those limitations can be a creative tool in their own right.
And within its' design parameters it's extremely easy to create different patterns on and no you don't need a new MIDI track for every pattern. In a DAW such as Sonar (or Logic, Cubase, etc) the entire application is itself a super-powered sequencer as far as MIDI (and audio) is concerned. Regard the step sequencer, piano roll view etc as sequencers running within a bigger sequencer.
To get back towards being on-topic, I suggest you spend more time with Sonar (or any other DAW or other software of a similar size) before deciding on hardware purchases and recording strategies beyond maybe a simple audio interface that can at least let you record a couple of tracks at a time and give usably low audio latency. As and when you firm up what you need you may well end up getting and using something else, but it never hurts to have a spare basic interface in reserve. And with audio interfaces what matters most is latency, the quality of the convertor chips (there are surprisingly few of them, but they can make a subtle difference), the quality of the electronics supporting the AD and DA chips, the noise floor of the analogue side of things such as the preamps and the quality of the drivers.
Another factor is the reputation of thr company for long-term support and how likely the whole thing is to be rendered useless by a Windows update. It's like printers, some manufacturers continue to update drivers for old products while others just tell you they've dropped support so please scrap your perfectly working two year old printer and buy a new one.