MCU (or other Mackie mode users) - There's good news & bad news. Updated 3/11/11

Page: < 123 > Showing page 2 of 3
Author
SilverfoxUK
Max Output Level: -85 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 257
  • Joined: 2006/08/27 12:45:53
  • Status: offline
Re:MCU (or other Mackie mode users) - There's good news & bad news.............. 2011/09/29 18:00:23 (permalink)
Wow, this IS embarrassing... it was all down to human error. 

 Funny how we can miss one minute detail and it can cause us hours of headache. 

When I checked my .ini file, I had failed to remove the old [EQ] and [Bus] parameters, so that is why the BCF was not controlling the PC correctly and some dials were moving in increments of on or off. 

 I was wondering why you have the pots assigned so randomly FBB, LOL. 

Anyway, came home changed the ini file and now.... WORKS. 

 Today, I won.... there are battles ahead but tonight I rest easy... 


Thanks again FBB, Appreciate all your help. may you always have bikes and fast ones at that. :)

 Also, looking at that site:  http://www.chrisboucher.c./cakewalk/mackiecontrol/   i kinda learnt how to create your own settings for any plug so I may have a bash at the Gliss EQ i've got or something else... let you know if i find something useful


It would be nice if there was a thread or page dedicated to parameters for 3rd party plugs that peeps had set up to add to their ini files.

X3 64bit (final update)
Windows 7 Ultimate x64
Gigabyte SKT-1155 P67A-UD5 B3    
Intel i5 2400 Sandybridge Quad core    
6 GB Corsair RAM
V-STUDIO 100 (Driver 1.50)
M-AudioAxiom 49
Korg PadKontrol
BCF2000 



#31
FastBikerBoy
Forum Host
  • Total Posts : 11326
  • Joined: 2008/01/25 16:15:36
  • Location: Watton, Norfolk, UK
  • Status: offline
Re:MCU (or other Mackie mode users) - There's good news & bad news.............. 2011/09/30 01:19:28 (permalink)
Hey don't be so hard on yourself, we all make mistakes that what makes us human.

At least you've got it sorted out. Good luck with sorting out some of your other plugins. They are relatively easy to do once you've got the hang of it.

The MackiControl.dll does ned some TLC though, there's a few functions that just don't work under X1 and of course PC control other than the EQ is not possible.

It's worth anyone reading this putting in a feature request for improved Mackie CS support. I already have.

BTW, my bikes are always fast, it's the rider lacking balls that keeps the lap times slow.
#32
SilverfoxUK
Max Output Level: -85 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 257
  • Joined: 2006/08/27 12:45:53
  • Status: offline
Re:MCU (or other Mackie mode users) - There's good news & bad news.............. 2011/09/30 07:24:42 (permalink)
Cheers FBB, 

 Irony is that now I have it working correctly I find that it is actually 1 million times faster to control the PC EQ with the mouse. 

 Currently it is, find bank on BCF with the desired EQ band gain control - boost, 

 then you want to sweep, so > change bank to find the sweep for that EQ etc etc... v slow. 

 LOL. 

but, I guess that is just the way you have set it out FBB, maybe that works better on the MCU. not sure. 

 Anyway, I can edit it so that the first band controls are all on one bank etc. So thats what I'll do. 

 Silver OUT.

X3 64bit (final update)
Windows 7 Ultimate x64
Gigabyte SKT-1155 P67A-UD5 B3    
Intel i5 2400 Sandybridge Quad core    
6 GB Corsair RAM
V-STUDIO 100 (Driver 1.50)
M-AudioAxiom 49
Korg PadKontrol
BCF2000 



#33
FastBikerBoy
Forum Host
  • Total Posts : 11326
  • Joined: 2008/01/25 16:15:36
  • Location: Watton, Norfolk, UK
  • Status: offline
Re:MCU (or other Mackie mode users) - There's good news & bad news.............. 2011/09/30 09:11:47 (permalink)
yes it is set up for my use. €i have a mcu €€and xt so that's 16 available parameters at a time. plus there's the m2-m4 keys
that allow quick access to user defined parameters such as q etc.

sorry about the post formatting. the blackberry browser is even worse with the forum software than firefox 6 is.



#34
Rothchild
Max Output Level: -61 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 1479
  • Joined: 2003/11/27 13:15:24
  • Status: offline
Re:MCU (or other Mackie mode users) - There's good news & bad news.............. 2011/09/30 09:58:29 (permalink)
Out of interest, has the most recent X1 patch fixed the mute arm enable bug?

Child
#35
FastBikerBoy
Forum Host
  • Total Posts : 11326
  • Joined: 2008/01/25 16:15:36
  • Location: Watton, Norfolk, UK
  • Status: offline
Re:MCU (or other Mackie mode users) - There's good news & bad news.............. 2011/10/01 01:33:19 (permalink)
Rothchild


Out of interest, has the most recent X1 patch fixed the mute arm enable bug?

Child

i haven't tried tbh. given that it's lost some functionality rather than gained it, i'll be surprised if it is fixed. the mackie cs dll is in some need of a lot of tlc from cw.
#36
mudgel
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 12010
  • Joined: 2004/08/13 00:56:05
  • Location: Linton Victoria (Near Ballarat)
  • Status: offline
Re:MCU (or other Mackie mode users) - There's good news & bad news.............. 2011/10/01 02:29:40 (permalink)
Considering that it took Cakewalk quite a bit of time to update it's own VS700 series with a new control surface driver and that the Prochannel controls appears upside down control wise shows that theres lots of work to do in that area.


Mike V. (MUDGEL)

STUDIO: Win 10 Pro x64, SPlat & CbB x64,
PC: ASUS Z370-A, INTEL i7 8700k, 32GIG DDR4 2400, OC 4.7Ghz.
Storage: 7 TB SATA III, 750GiG SSD & Samsung 500 Gig 960 EVO NVMe M.2.
Monitors: Adam A7X, JBL 10” Sub.
Audio I/O & DSP Server: DIGIGRID IOS & IOX.
Screen: Raven MTi + 43" HD 4K TV Monitor.
Keyboard Controller: Native Instruments Komplete Kontrol S88.
#37
FastBikerBoy
Forum Host
  • Total Posts : 11326
  • Joined: 2008/01/25 16:15:36
  • Location: Watton, Norfolk, UK
  • Status: offline
Re:MCU (or other Mackie mode users) - There's good news & bad news.............. 2011/10/01 05:45:53 (permalink)
mudgel


Considering that it took Cakewalk quite a bit of time to update it's own VS700 series with a new control surface driver and that the Prochannel controls appears upside down control wise shows that theres lots of work to do in that area.


The most annoying thing from my point of view is that the MCU can't even 'see' the PC Compressor & Saturator. It wouldn't be too bad if I could control it as a regular plugin but as it stands there is no control at all. I've put in a feature request and I'm hoping others using the Mackie protocol have too.


#38
SilverfoxUK
Max Output Level: -85 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 257
  • Joined: 2006/08/27 12:45:53
  • Status: offline
Re:MCU (or other Mackie mode users) - There's good news & bad news.............. 2011/10/03 03:54:47 (permalink)
Ok, I have now set up my BCF2000 MC .ini how I like it. First band controls all on one bank etc. 

 just wondering 1 thing. IS it possible to have a blank vpot? for example 

VPOT1=0, BLAH BLAH
VPOT2=1, BLAH BLAH
VPOT3= **BLANK*
ETC.

 Thing is, when I leave one blank so I can have a gap in the controls, it seems fine going up through the banks (in edit mode) but it seems to lose the last vpot control and then going back down the banks it shifts everything else back one place. 

Is it just a case that there are 27 parameters, and the mackieControl HAS to have the first 27 controls set as one for one. 

 Hope that makes sense? 

X3 64bit (final update)
Windows 7 Ultimate x64
Gigabyte SKT-1155 P67A-UD5 B3    
Intel i5 2400 Sandybridge Quad core    
6 GB Corsair RAM
V-STUDIO 100 (Driver 1.50)
M-AudioAxiom 49
Korg PadKontrol
BCF2000 



#39
FastBikerBoy
Forum Host
  • Total Posts : 11326
  • Joined: 2008/01/25 16:15:36
  • Location: Watton, Norfolk, UK
  • Status: offline
Re:MCU (or other Mackie mode users) - There's good news & bad news.............. 2011/10/03 07:42:00 (permalink)
SilverfoxUK


Ok, I have now set up my BCF2000 MC .ini how I like it. First band controls all on one bank etc. 

just wondering 1 thing. IS it possible to have a blank vpot? for example 

VPOT1=0, BLAH BLAH
VPOT2=1, BLAH BLAH
VPOT3= **BLANK*
ETC.

Thing is, when I leave one blank so I can have a gap in the controls, it seems fine going up through the banks (in edit mode) but it seems to lose the last vpot control and then going back down the banks it shifts everything else back one place. 

Is it just a case that there are 27 parameters, and the mackieControl HAS to have the first 27 controls set as one for one. 

Hope that makes sense? 


Short answer is I don't know.

My best guess though would be no. I think if you don't assign a parameter to a V-pot then it will automatically be assigned to one, whether you like it or not.

The reason I think that is if there is no assignment for a particular plugin in the ini file then the default behaviour is to assign the V-pots in the order in which the parameters are presented by Sonar.

I guess there's no harm in trying and see what happens.
#40
SilverfoxUK
Max Output Level: -85 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 257
  • Joined: 2006/08/27 12:45:53
  • Status: offline
Re:MCU (or other Mackie mode users) - There's good news & bad news.............. 2011/10/07 06:44:45 (permalink)
FastBikerBoy


SilverfoxUK


Ok, I have now set up my BCF2000 MC .ini how I like it. First band controls all on one bank etc. 

just wondering 1 thing. IS it possible to have a blank vpot? for example 

VPOT1=0, BLAH BLAH
VPOT2=1, BLAH BLAH
VPOT3= **BLANK*
ETC.

Thing is, when I leave one blank so I can have a gap in the controls, it seems fine going up through the banks (in edit mode) but it seems to lose the last vpot control and then going back down the banks it shifts everything else back one place. 

Is it just a case that there are 27 parameters, and the mackieControl HAS to have the first 27 controls set as one for one. 

Hope that makes sense? 


Short answer is I don't know.

My best guess though would be no. I think if you don't assign a parameter to a V-pot then it will automatically be assigned to one, whether you like it or not.

The reason I think that is if there is no assignment for a particular plugin in the ini file then the default behaviour is to assign the V-pots in the order in which the parameters are presented by Sonar.

I guess there's no harm in trying and see what happens.

You are right (no surprise there ;)


 Changing a vpot to blank or commenting it out only leads to problems. 


At first it seems ok, a blank vpot is there, however when you start 'Banking' across in edit mode on the BCF, you find that there is one parameter missing from the end bank (like blanking one out in the MackieControl.ini moves it along one vpot) and when banking back, ithe blank one is gone and it has just squashed up the parameters and deleted the blank vpot. quite strange. 


 I guess as you said, if you leave a blank, it is trying to assign it as it comes by default. 


Shame, because I want my banks to be nice and clean with each band on a bank. i.e. 


Vpots 0 - 7


Enable , Gloss , LF on/off , Q, Gain

Vpots 8 - 15

LMF on/off , Q, Gain

Vpots 16 - 

 HMF.....

you get the idea. I can live with it though. 

At least I have got all the bands controls for PC on one bank now, so I can actually use all the controls at once. Much nicer than using mouse!

 Maybe it will be useful for other BCF-ers. I'll post it up over the weekend.  

X3 64bit (final update)
Windows 7 Ultimate x64
Gigabyte SKT-1155 P67A-UD5 B3    
Intel i5 2400 Sandybridge Quad core    
6 GB Corsair RAM
V-STUDIO 100 (Driver 1.50)
M-AudioAxiom 49
Korg PadKontrol
BCF2000 



#41
Freex
Max Output Level: -81 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 478
  • Joined: 2010/11/23 11:10:50
  • Location: Northern Ireland
  • Status: offline
Re:MCU (or other Mackie mode users) - There's good news & bad news.............. 2011/10/07 10:06:28 (permalink)
I have a Mackie C4 so I changed the vpots order around a bit to make it more correspondant to the PC EQ

But have to chnage the numVPots= to not have any pots missing.

My example setup is.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
;For Pro Channel EQ
[Track Eq]
PluginType=1
NumVPots=32
----------------------------------------------
VPot0=5,freq,0.24   ; LF Freq
VPot1=10,freq,0.40   ; LMF Freq
VPot2=14,freq,0.65   ; HMF Freq
VPot3=18,freq,0.84   ; HF Freq
VPot4
VPot5
VPot6=1,pan, 0.5, 0.5   ; EQ Type Pure/Vintage/Modern
VPot7=0,switch    ; EQ Enable
VPot8=6,spread,0.2  ; LF Q
VPot9=11,spread,0.2  ; LMF Q
VPot10=15,spread,0.2  ; HMF Q
VPot11=19,spread,0.2  ; HF Q
VPot12=3,switch    ; LF On/Off
VPot13=8,switch    ; LMF On/Off
VPot14=12,switch    ; HMF On/Off
VPot15=16,switch    ; HF On/Off
VPot16=4,boost/cut,0.5  ; LF Level
VPot17=9,boost/cut,0.5  ; LMF Level
VPot18=13,boost/cut,0.5  ; HMF Level
VPot19=17,boost/cut,0.5  ; HF Level
VPot20
VPot21=7,switch   ; LF Shelf/Peak
VPot22
VPot23=20,switch    ; HF Shelf/Peak
VPot24=25,freq,0.24   ; HPF Freq
VPot25=26,spread,0.143,0.142855    ; HPF Slope
VPot26=23,spread,0.143,0.142855    ; LPF Slope
VPot27 =22,freq,0.84   ; LPF Freq 
VPot28
VPot29=24,switch   ; HPF On/Off
VPot30=2,switch    ; Gloss On/Off
VPot31=21,switch   ; LPF On/Off
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 M2VPot0=6,spread,0.2 ; LF Q
 M2VPot1=11,spread,0.2 ; LMF Q
 M2VPot2=15,spread,0.2 ; HMF Q  
 M2VPot3=19,spread,0.2 ; HF Q
 M2VPot4=26,spread,0.143,0.142855   ; HPF Slope
 M2VPot5=23,spread,0.143,0.142855   ; LPF Slope
 
 M3VPot0=4,boost/cut,0.5 ; LF Gain
 M3VPot1=9,boost/cut,0.5 ; LMF Gain
 M3VPot2=13,boost/cut,0.5 ; HMF Gain
 M3VPot3=17,boost/cut,0.5 ; HF Gain
 
 M4VPot0=3,switch ; LF On/Off
 M4VPot1=8,switch ; LMF On/Off
 M4VPot2=12,switch ; HMF On/Off
 M4VPot3=16,switch ; HF On/Off
 M4VPot4=24,switch ; HPF On/Off
 m4VPot5=21,switch ; LPF On/Off
 M4VPot6=0,switch ; EQ Enable
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
NumFreqBands=4
Gain0=4,boost/cut,0.5 ; LF Gain
Gain1=9,boost/cut,0.5 ; LMF Gain
Gain2=13,boost/cut,0.5 ; HMF Gain
Gain3=17,boost/cut,0.5 ; HF Gain
CourseFreq0=5,freq,0.24 ; LF Freq
CourseFreq1=10,freq,0.40 ; LMF Freq
CourseFreq2=14,freq,0.65 ; HMF Freq
CourseFreq3=18,freq,0.84 ; HF Freq
Q0=6,spread,0.2 ; LF Q
Q1=11,spread,0.2 ; LMF Q
Q2=15,spread,0.2 ; HMF Q
Q3=19,spread,0.2 ; HF Q
BandEnable0=3,switch ; LF On/Off
BandEnable1=8,switch ; LMF On/Off
BandEnable2=12,switch ; HMF On/Off
BandEnable3=16,switch ; HF On/Off
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Works really nicely on the C4


Asus P9X79, Intel i7-3930k, 32GB RAM ,Windows 7, RME RayDat, Presonus Firestudio, Presonus Digimax FS, Mackie MCU, Mackie XT, Makcie C4, KRK Rokit 6

How To Setup A Drum Map...The Easy Way.PDF

#42
SilverfoxUK
Max Output Level: -85 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 257
  • Joined: 2006/08/27 12:45:53
  • Status: offline
Re:MCU (or other Mackie mode users) - There's good news & bad news.............. 2011/10/07 14:43:01 (permalink)
Wow, so you are saying that you can have blanks if you increase the amount of vpots?

 pretty sure i checked this already, maybe doesnt work on the BCF?

will give it another go!

X3 64bit (final update)
Windows 7 Ultimate x64
Gigabyte SKT-1155 P67A-UD5 B3    
Intel i5 2400 Sandybridge Quad core    
6 GB Corsair RAM
V-STUDIO 100 (Driver 1.50)
M-AudioAxiom 49
Korg PadKontrol
BCF2000 



#43
SilverfoxUK
Max Output Level: -85 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 257
  • Joined: 2006/08/27 12:45:53
  • Status: offline
Re:MCU (or other Mackie mode users) - There's good news & bad news.............. 2011/10/07 18:32:15 (permalink)
Well well well Freex, 

 nice one. It only bloody works. Not sure what I was doing wrong before, I'm sure I tried increasing the VPOT= amount to allow for the extra blanks. 

 Anyway, now it is as I want it. 


 Nice one pal. 

 Now... Expanded or not expanded... that is the question

X3 64bit (final update)
Windows 7 Ultimate x64
Gigabyte SKT-1155 P67A-UD5 B3    
Intel i5 2400 Sandybridge Quad core    
6 GB Corsair RAM
V-STUDIO 100 (Driver 1.50)
M-AudioAxiom 49
Korg PadKontrol
BCF2000 



#44
FastBikerBoy
Forum Host
  • Total Posts : 11326
  • Joined: 2008/01/25 16:15:36
  • Location: Watton, Norfolk, UK
  • Status: offline
Re:MCU (or other Mackie mode users) - There's good news & bad news.............. 2011/10/07 19:20:31 (permalink)
Hey that's good to know, thanks Freex, I may find a use for that.

BTW I've also updated the other MCU thread with details of my MCU "bug" report.
#45
SilverfoxUK
Max Output Level: -85 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 257
  • Joined: 2006/08/27 12:45:53
  • Status: offline
Re:MCU (or other Mackie mode users) - There's good news & bad news.............. 2011/10/07 19:49:08 (permalink)
Good stuff FBB, hopefully one day we will have access to all the PC controls. 

 I just wonder how many Sonar users actually use the MackieControl...? cant be that many

X3 64bit (final update)
Windows 7 Ultimate x64
Gigabyte SKT-1155 P67A-UD5 B3    
Intel i5 2400 Sandybridge Quad core    
6 GB Corsair RAM
V-STUDIO 100 (Driver 1.50)
M-AudioAxiom 49
Korg PadKontrol
BCF2000 



#46
FastBikerBoy
Forum Host
  • Total Posts : 11326
  • Joined: 2008/01/25 16:15:36
  • Location: Watton, Norfolk, UK
  • Status: offline
Re:MCU (or other Mackie mode users) - There's good news & bad news.............. 2011/11/03 06:57:03 (permalink)
I've just updated the first post in this thread to reflect all the changes I've made up to now.

I'm guessing several of you may already have fine tuned it to the way you like but if you haven't and you're as OCD about the Mackie as I seem to be, then the first post explains what to do......

Anyway.. the 'highlights' are.......

1. Pressing the EQ button for the third time now activates 6 bands, although only 4 respond to gain. The other two are the HPF & LPF control freq on the V-Pot, slope (M2 + VPot), on/off (M4 + VPot).

2. In single track mode M2 + VPot, Q or slope depending on control. M4 + Vpot all on/offs for parameters

3. The freq settings when pressing a V-Pot now default to the following.  LF = 48, LMF = 280, HMF = 1.60k, HF = 8.40k, HPF = 40 & LPF = 16 k. That puts them all in the centre of their respective graph areas (I said I was OCD about it).

I also fixed a couple of faults with my original where the slope controls on the buss compressor weren't behaving quite right.

Hope someone finds this useful and if I can appeal to any other MCU protocol users to put in a bug report for the various parts of the MCU that no longer work. A list of which ready to cut & paste can be found HERE.

Thanks
#47
inaheartbeat
Max Output Level: -77 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 679
  • Joined: 2011/08/11 12:19:15
  • Location: Nashua, NH USA
  • Status: offline
Re:MCU (or other Mackie mode users) - There's good news & bad news. Updated 3/11/11 2011/11/03 08:18:42 (permalink)
FBB that is a tremendous piece of work. Would any of this apply to using AC-7 on an iPad?  I know the first answer might be "try it"  but I am not near where that can happen just now.

PC Audio Labs mobile i7 MC, 3.46 Ghz i7 990X, 12 Gb RAM, 3 750 Gb 7200 RPM drives, 3 USB2, 2 USB 3 ports, firewire, Windows 7 64 bit Pro, Sonar X3e Producer 64 bit, 
#48
FastBikerBoy
Forum Host
  • Total Posts : 11326
  • Joined: 2008/01/25 16:15:36
  • Location: Watton, Norfolk, UK
  • Status: offline
Re:MCU (or other Mackie mode users) - There's good news & bad news. Updated 3/11/11 2011/11/03 08:23:28 (permalink)
Only if it uses the mackie protocol. Obviously the MCU + MCU pro do and the BCF 2000 can. I'm sure other surfaces use it but I don't know specifics. Sorry.
#49
prinsarian
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 3
  • Joined: 2011/12/29 17:26:52
  • Location: Volendam, the Netherlands
  • Status: offline
Re:MCU (or other Mackie mode users) - There's good news & bad news. Updated 3/11/11 2011/12/30 03:36:19 (permalink)
Hello all,
First post here on this fine board. I see many people are working on getting BCF and BCR working optimally with Sonar.

I´m having some trouble getting my BCF2000 (in Mackie Sonar mode) working properly with X1c/Producer/Expanded (64bit). 
I previously used Sonar 8.5.3 (also 64bit) and I edited the mackiecontrol.ini file as explained here and on several other pages on the net. I made a few adjuistments to the EQ layout so that when you put the BCF in "EQ Fader mode" (3 presses on the Eq mode button) the layout is:
rotary 1: freq band 1
rotary 2: band 1 on/off
fader 1: gain
fader 2: q

Repeat for bands 2,3,4. This really worked great!

Now that I upgraded to X1c/exp these controls still work with a project previously saved in 8.5.3 (because internally it uses the old EQ's) but the proChannel eq's are mapped randomly. Fome faders just control a push button, and only the first band seems to have any mapping.

Of course I found this post and started editting my mackiecontrol.ini ... but ... nothing changed. The mappings are just as silly as they have been and seem to have not changed at all. After a little scanning on my system I found another mackiecontrol.ini, this time not in a c:\program files subdirectory, but somewhere in my user directory. So I started editing that one as well, still no results.

Does anyone have any tips on how to proceed? My ini file seems to not have been overwritten since upgrade and the dll seems to be very old as well.

Any thoughts would greatly be appreciated.

And a second question while I´m at it.... I´ve never gotten around to getting bcfview working on my win7 system. I've switched from standard windows usb drivers to behringer drivers, still nothing. I anyone has some tips, again: greatly appreciated.

Arian Prins.
#50
FastBikerBoy
Forum Host
  • Total Posts : 11326
  • Joined: 2008/01/25 16:15:36
  • Location: Watton, Norfolk, UK
  • Status: offline
Re:MCU (or other Mackie mode users) - There's good news & bad news. Updated 3/11/11 2011/12/30 04:43:33 (permalink)
To assign parameters to the faders/pots etc you need to look at the mappings, much as you have done before, they just need changing to suit the way the PC EQ parameters are presented to the surface.

For example the line

VPot0=5,freq,0.1267            ; LF Freq

just tells the Mackie that I want the first vpot to control the 5th parameter which in the case of the PC EQ is the Low Frequency band frequency.

Whatever changes you have made to your ini.file in the section that controls the "EQ Fader Mode" need adjusting to how you want the controls assigned. You can work out the parameter positions from the first post or alternatively comment out or delete the whole section and then when you switch to EQ mode you can see the actual default presentation order as the mackie sees them, start counting from 0 and work left to right.

I'm not in my studio ATM so can't check my ini file but when I get back in a few hours I'll have a quick look and post any more relevant info.

BCFView needs to be started before Sonar and you need to right click on GUI and assign the correct BCF MIDI port.
#51
FastBikerBoy
Forum Host
  • Total Posts : 11326
  • Joined: 2008/01/25 16:15:36
  • Location: Watton, Norfolk, UK
  • Status: offline
Re:MCU (or other Mackie mode users) - There's good news & bad news. Updated 3/11/11 2011/12/30 04:50:17 (permalink)
Just another thought, make sure the line [track eq] just above the sonitus assignments is commented out or the mackie/bcf will assume sonitus is your default track eq.

#52
prinsarian
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 3
  • Joined: 2011/12/29 17:26:52
  • Location: Volendam, the Netherlands
  • Status: offline
Re:MCU (or other Mackie mode users) - There's good news & bad news. Updated 3/11/11 2011/12/30 05:09:19 (permalink)
FastBikerBoy


Just another thought, make sure the line [track eq] just above the sonitus assignments is commented out or the mackie/bcf will assume sonitus is your default track eq.

Hi FBB,
Huh? The header look exactly the same for sonitus and for prochannel: [Track Eq]... If I quote your ini from the first page:
 
; For Sonitus EQ
;[Track Eq]
;PluginType=1
;NumVPots=21
;VPot0=4,freq,0.24  
...
;For Pro Channel EQ
[Track Eq]
PluginType=1
NumVPots=27
VPot0=5,freq,0.1267            ; LF Freq
 
So how can mackie/bcf distinguish between one and the other? I think I'll take your advise and remove all content from the Track Eq and then see what happens. Then I'll also know for shure which version of the mackiecontrol.ini file is actually loaded.
 
About bcfview... I do start it before sonar and right-click and select the bcf midi port. Still only a blue screen.
 
Thanks for the tips.
Arian.
#53
FastBikerBoy
Forum Host
  • Total Posts : 11326
  • Joined: 2008/01/25 16:15:36
  • Location: Watton, Norfolk, UK
  • Status: offline
Re:MCU (or other Mackie mode users) - There's good news & bad news. Updated 3/11/11 2011/12/30 06:04:55 (permalink)
They are identical except the Sonitus one is commented out. That's what the ";" does. The line is effectively ignored.

Are you starting the BCF before BCF View? I can't remember the correct sequence now but one needs to be started before the other, that will make a difference. Also make sure you have the correct BCF port assigned, you should see 3 BCF ports IIRC but can't remember which one it is now. Sorry, it's been a while since I used a BCF in mackie mode.

Hopefully a current user will jump in with more up-to-date factual info, rather than my poor hazy memory.
#54
prinsarian
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 3
  • Joined: 2011/12/29 17:26:52
  • Location: Volendam, the Netherlands
  • Status: offline
Re:MCU (or other Mackie mode users) - There's good news & bad news. Updated 3/11/11 2011/12/30 15:53:20 (permalink)
 Hello all,
FastBikerBoy, thanks again. I've got it figured out.
There were a few problems working together to give me a hard time. 
1. BCFView didn't work. Don't know why, but re-downloading got it working. Now that I wasn't blind anymore I could at least see what I was doing. 
2. It seems to be that win7 somehow protects files in the program files folder. So if you edit something like mackiecontrol.ini it first copies the file to a location such as C:\Users\arian\AppData\Local\VirtualStore\Program Files\Cakewalk\Shared Surfaces\ and in reality you'll be editting that file. I think that was what caused me to not see any changes I made. Running my text editor as admin did the trick. 
3. I wanted to change a few things in your example, but I edited the wrong section. Wasn't able to figure that out until 1 & 2 were solved. I figured out what I wanted to change by adding your ini example part by part. I have now found out that the faders in EQ-Fader mode are defined by the GainX statements and the rotaries in that mode are defined by CourseFreqX.
Is there any documentation on all the possible configuration options in mackiecontrol.ini. I know about this site (www.chrisboucher.com/cakewalk/mackiecontrol) but it is fairly limited in the options it details. 
I'll post my EQ parts of the mackiecontrol.ini:  Feel free to comment on anything that seems illogical, although the BCF2000 is now again doing exactly what I want it to do.  Arian.
---------------------
[Bus Eq]
PluginType=1
NumVPots=8
; E1. Mode:
VPot0=5,freq,0.1267               ; LF Freq
VPot2=10,freq,0.38205               ; LMF Freq
VPot4=14,freq,0.634               ; HMF Freq
VPot6=18,freq,0.8745               ; HF Freq
VPot1=6,spread,0.5               ; LF Q
VPot3=11,spread,0.5               ; LMF Q
VPot5=15,spread,0.5               ; HMF Q
VPot7=19,spread,0.5               ; HF Q
 
; These are the faders in faderEQ mode:
NumFreqBands=8
Gain0=4,boost/cut,0.5               ; LF Gain
Gain1=9,boost/cut,0.5               ; LMF Gain
Gain2=13,boost/cut,0.5               ; HMF Gain
Gain3=17,boost/cut,0.5               ; HF Gain
Gain4=25,freq,0.1005            ; HPF Freq
Gain5=26,spread,0.143,0.142855          ; HPF Slope
Gain6=23,spread,0.143,0.142855          ; LPF Slope
Gain7=22,freq,0.9677            ; LPF Freq
; These are the rotaries in faderEQ mode:
CourseFreq0=5,freq,0.1267              ; LF Freq
CourseFreq2=10,freq,0.38205              ; LMF Freq
CourseFreq4=14,freq,0.634              ; HMF Freq
CourseFreq6=18,freq,0.8745              ; HF Freq
CourseFreq1=6,spread,0.5              ; LF Q
CourseFreq3=11,spread,0.5              ; LMF Q
CourseFreq5=15,spread,0.5              ; HMF Q
CourseFreq7=19,spread,0.5              ; HF Q
[Track Eq]
PluginType=1
NumVPots=8
; E1. Mode:
VPot0=5,freq,0.1267               ; LF Freq
VPot2=10,freq,0.38205               ; LMF Freq
VPot4=14,freq,0.634               ; HMF Freq
VPot6=18,freq,0.8745               ; HF Freq
VPot1=6,spread,0.5               ; LF Q
VPot3=11,spread,0.5               ; LMF Q
VPot5=15,spread,0.5               ; HMF Q
VPot7=19,spread,0.5               ; HF Q
 
; These are the faders in faderEQ mode:
NumFreqBands=8
Gain0=4,boost/cut,0.5               ; LF Gain
Gain1=9,boost/cut,0.5               ; LMF Gain
Gain2=13,boost/cut,0.5               ; HMF Gain
Gain3=17,boost/cut,0.5               ; HF Gain
Gain4=25,freq,0.1005            ; HPF Freq
Gain5=26,spread,0.143,0.142855          ; HPF Slope
Gain6=23,spread,0.143,0.142855          ; LPF Slope
Gain7=22,freq,0.9677            ; LPF Freq
; These are the rotaries in faderEQ mode:
CourseFreq0=5,freq,0.1267              ; LF Freq
CourseFreq2=10,freq,0.38205              ; LMF Freq
CourseFreq4=14,freq,0.634              ; HMF Freq
CourseFreq6=18,freq,0.8745              ; HF Freq
CourseFreq1=6,spread,0.5              ; LF Q
CourseFreq3=11,spread,0.5              ; LMF Q
CourseFreq5=15,spread,0.5              ; HMF Q
CourseFreq7=19,spread,0.5              ; HF Q
post edited by prinsarian - 2011/12/30 16:06:58

Producer / Mixing engineer / Songwriter
------------------------------------------------------------------------Software: X1/Producer/Expanded/64bit
System: Win7 - 4Gb
Interface: Focusrite Saffire Pro 40
Keys: JV2080 / GEM S2R / Novation A-Station / Kawai MP-4
Monitoring: PMC TB2S (main)/ Spirit absolute zero (surround)
Control Surface: BCF-2000
#55
FastBikerBoy
Forum Host
  • Total Posts : 11326
  • Joined: 2008/01/25 16:15:36
  • Location: Watton, Norfolk, UK
  • Status: offline
Re:MCU (or other Mackie mode users) - There's good news & bad news. Updated 3/11/11 2011/12/30 16:04:50 (permalink)
Glad you've got it sorted.

Other than the site you've linked info on the ini file seems pretty limited. CW have mentioned elsewhere that updating support for the various control surfaces including the Mackie is on the agenda, so that's good news.

Nothing illogical about any setup that works for you.

I guess by the lack of paragraphs that you are using the latest version of firefox. You might want to try an earlier version such as V5 or earlier or Google Chrome works as well.
#56
Kman88
Max Output Level: -88 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 104
  • Joined: 2007/05/23 20:39:33
  • Location: Florida
  • Status: offline
Re:MCU (or other Mackie mode users) - There's good news & bad news. Updated 3/11/11 2012/11/09 17:13:28 (permalink)
AAAHHH! I was going nuts trying to get this to work in X2!! Then I tried it in X1 and it works perfectly. But nothing in X2. The PC Compressor values can be changed, but not the EQ. Is there any way to get the PC EQ working with X2? Thanks, Kevin Have MCU + XT + C4 ps. thanks so much for all your posts and your insight into MackieControl.ini

Win 7 64bit, Asus MB with AMD Quad Core,  8GB Ram, RME Multiface II, Yamaha Motif ES6

Regards,
Kevin Keough
#57
FastBikerBoy
Forum Host
  • Total Posts : 11326
  • Joined: 2008/01/25 16:15:36
  • Location: Watton, Norfolk, UK
  • Status: offline
Re:MCU (or other Mackie mode users) - There's good news & bad news. Updated 3/11/11 2012/11/10 01:54:14 (permalink)
Is there any way to get the PC EQ working with X2?

There is, but don't get excited because it's not very practical. It will work if the EQ is the first module in the PC chain which means having the EQ pre compressor or the PC post effects bin and putting a compressor in there. Either solutions are no good for me.

If you haven't already please consider putting in a feature request and/or bug report. This list has changed slightly since the introduction of X1d/X2 (esp. # 3) but most of it is still relevant.

http://forum.cakewalk.com/fb.ashx?m=2403961

#58
Rob[at]Sound-Rehab
Max Output Level: -47 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 2819
  • Joined: 2011/02/03 04:31:35
  • Location: Sound-Rehab, Austria
  • Status: offline
Re:MCU (or other Mackie mode users) - There's good news & bad news.............. 2012/11/10 03:25:49 (permalink)
Hi guys!

Please do us a favour and put in problem reports on anything that doesn't work with the MCU because over in the VS-700 forum we are discussing identical problems (mainly ProChannel not controllable from control surface).

It looks like Cake hasn't had much time to work on that in the past year (which is OK as they came out with a very stable and cool version of X2), but now it's time we remind them again that there are people out there who don't just play around with the mouse, but have invested $$$ in one or several control surfaces and get no support for the latest and greatest Sonar advancements (the PC!).

Cheers.


GOOD TUNES LAST FOREVER
  +++   Visit the Rehab   +++
 
DAW: Platinum/X3e, win10 64 bit, i7-3930K (6x3.2GHz), Asus Sabertooth X79, 32 GB DDR3 1600MHz, ATI HD 5450, 120 GB SSD OCZ Agility3, 2x 1TB WD HDD SATA 600
Audio-Interface: 2x MOTU 1248 AVB, Focusrite OctoPre, (Roland Octa-Capture)   Control-Surface: VS-700C 
VSTi: WAVES, NI K10u, FabFilter, IK, ... (too many really) 
#59
FastBikerBoy
Forum Host
  • Total Posts : 11326
  • Joined: 2008/01/25 16:15:36
  • Location: Watton, Norfolk, UK
  • Status: offline
Re:MCU (or other Mackie mode users) - There's good news & bad news.............. 2012/11/10 03:44:33 (permalink)
I second that.... mine have been in since it all started going wrong at the release of X1. The PC is great and I use it almost exclusively but I'd love to have full control over the track effects in the same way as I could in 8.5.

I'm working round it by using my BCF as an ACT controller but the MCU would be better.
#60
Page: < 123 > Showing page 2 of 3
Jump to:
© 2025 APG vNext Commercial Version 5.1