MOTU-ASIO or WDM

Author
michael japan
Max Output Level: -22.5 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 5252
  • Joined: 2004/01/29 03:01:03
  • Status: offline
2004/02/17 05:09:26 (permalink)

MOTU-ASIO or WDM

wanted to get the general concensus if it's not too much of a bother if most people with MOTU soundcards (specifically 828MKII) are using the ASIO drivers or WDM/KS. Mine's running smooth as a kitten with WDM and that was recommended to me by Rip Rowan for use in Sonar. Cubase (nasty word?) uses the ASIO seamlessly but Sonar? Opinions gentleman of the walk?
< Message edited by michael japan -- 2/17/2004 5:12:42 AM >
#1

25 Replies Related Threads

    Graham
    Max Output Level: -80 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 539
    • Joined: 2003/11/09 11:22:42
    • Location: Brunei
    • Status: offline
    RE: MOTU-ASIO or WDM 2004/02/17 05:51:47 (permalink)
    Michael

    828 Mk II - using WDM driver model 3.2. Works like a dream. The only problem I've seen, and this is no big deal is setting up to use 96kHz - I say it's no big deal because:

    1. I'm normally quite happy at 44.1
    2. Noel from Cakewalk gave me an excellent step by step set up for changing between the two.

    MOTU likes MAcs better but I've never been happier with a soundcard and I've had a few.

    Graham
    #2
    ebinary
    Max Output Level: -64 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 1336
    • Joined: 2003/12/23 08:58:54
    • Status: offline
    RE: MOTU-ASIO or WDM 2004/02/17 06:39:05 (permalink)



    wanted to get the general concensus if it's not too much of a bother if most people with MOTU soundcards (specifically 828MKII) are using the ASIO drivers or WDM/KS. Mine's running smooth as a kitten with WDM and that was recommended to me by Rip Rowan for use in Sonar. Cubase (nasty word?) uses the ASIO seamlessly but Sonar? Opinions gentleman of the walk?


    Unless you manually edit your AUD.ini file, the MOTU WDM latency reported in Sonar is not the actual latency (you can test by using some very high latencies, where you will actually hear that the WDM latency is noticable higher).

    That being said, if you do use the mkII in WDM mode, use this AUD.ini hack. Noel (from Cakewalk) recommended modifying this line in AUD.INI for the MOTU 828mkII:
    KsUseInputEvent=1

    With this hack WDM will actually perform at the latency advertised. However, if AUD.ini is ever recreated, you will lose this value and you'll have to re-add it.

    Personally, I use ASIO exclusively, because it doesn't rely on AUD.ini hacks. There is another reason I do it, but unfortunately I can't recall the reason. But after getting Noel's hack, I ran in WDM mode for a couple of days, before switching back because something else about WDM bugged me.

    Eric
    < Message edited by ebinary -- 2/17/2004 6:40:35 AM >
    #3
    michael japan
    Max Output Level: -22.5 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 5252
    • Joined: 2004/01/29 03:01:03
    • Status: offline
    RE: MOTU-ASIO or WDM 2004/02/17 06:43:35 (permalink)
    KsUseInputEvent=1

    so what do I do-copy KsUseInputEvent=1

    into my ini? SO you do extensive audio work (15 tracks plus your mix back into the soundcard) without any problem with ASIO?
    #4
    rossipsu1
    Max Output Level: -70 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 1030
    • Joined: 2004/02/02 10:16:20
    • Location: Philadelphia, PA
    • Status: offline
    RE: MOTU-ASIO or WDM 2004/02/17 10:37:15 (permalink)
    That being said, if you do use the mkII in WDM mode, use this AUD.ini hack. Noel (from Cakewalk) recommended modifying this line in AUD.INI for the MOTU 828mkII:
    KsUseInputEvent=1


    Intesting. I'm using a single 1224 and a single 24i through a PCI 324 card. Do you think that hack will work for my setup as well ?
    #5
    danhazer
    Max Output Level: -54.5 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 2053
    • Joined: 2004/01/08 17:05:18
    • Location: Minneapolis, Minnesota
    • Status: offline
    RE: MOTU-ASIO or WDM 2004/02/17 10:45:29 (permalink)
    I have a MOTU 2408 MK III and I use ASIO with minimal problems. I performed the loopback test and with WDM and I could not get latency lower than 200 samples. When I switched to ASIO the latency decreased to around 80 samples. I wish it could be zero, but I can't seem to get it to be zero no matter what I do.

    Thanks,

    Dan
    #6
    ebinary
    Max Output Level: -64 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 1336
    • Joined: 2003/12/23 08:58:54
    • Status: offline
    RE: MOTU-ASIO or WDM 2004/02/17 10:56:03 (permalink)
    so what do I do-copy KsUseInputEvent=1


    It should already be there, just change it to 1.

    To the other folks wondering if this hack will work for other MOTU units. Search this forum for KsUseInputEvent. Maybe Noel commented on it. Otherwise, raise the WDM latency until you hear an obvious slapback through an open mic. Close Sonar, change the param, and listen again.

    Eric
    < Message edited by ebinary -- 2/17/2004 12:22:50 PM >
    #7
    John Page
    Max Output Level: -77 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 672
    • Joined: 2003/11/10 20:40:45
    • Location: New York
    • Status: offline
    RE: MOTU-ASIO or WDM 2004/02/17 11:39:28 (permalink)
    MOTU likes MAcs better but I've never been happier with a soundcard and I've had a few.


    ???????????????????????
    #8
    michael japan
    Max Output Level: -22.5 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 5252
    • Joined: 2004/01/29 03:01:03
    • Status: offline
    RE: MOTU-ASIO or WDM 2004/02/17 12:09:20 (permalink)
    do your question marks have a meaning John? Are you saying you don't understand what Graham is saying? Just to let you know the response was to my post and I did understand it.
    #9
    John Page
    Max Output Level: -77 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 672
    • Joined: 2003/11/10 20:40:45
    • Location: New York
    • Status: offline
    RE: MOTU-ASIO or WDM 2004/02/17 13:05:58 (permalink)
    do your question marks have a meaning John? Are you saying you don't understand what Graham is saying? Just to let you know the response was to my post and I did understand it.


    I do not understand us MOTU users being MOTU apologist’s, the MOTU stuff works just as well under Windows as a MAC. The MOTU stuff works as well under Windows as any other brand and their drivers are current and solid. ( I do admit their phone support could be ALOT better). I bought MOTU for the cross platform capability and use my 896 and 828 under Windows as well as MAC and like I said it works equally as well so the statement that MOTU likes MAC better that Windows is completely without merit.
    #10
    ebinary
    Max Output Level: -64 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 1336
    • Joined: 2003/12/23 08:58:54
    • Status: offline
    RE: MOTU-ASIO or WDM 2004/02/17 13:18:20 (permalink)
    quote:

    do your question marks have a meaning John? Are you saying you don't understand what Graham is saying? Just to let you know the response was to my post and I did understand it.

    I do not understand us MOTU users being MOTU apologist’s, the MOTU stuff works just as well under Windows as a MAC. The MOTU stuff works as well under Windows as any other brand and their drivers are current and solid. ( I do admit their phone support could be ALOT better). I bought MOTU for the cross platform capability and use my 896 and 828 under Windows as well as MAC and like I said it works equally as well so the statement that MOTU likes MAC better that Windows is completely without merit.


    Maybe the statement should be: MOTU likes Macs better than PCs, but they still like PCs better than most other manufacturers.

    Eric
    #11
    rossipsu1
    Max Output Level: -70 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 1030
    • Joined: 2004/02/02 10:16:20
    • Location: Philadelphia, PA
    • Status: offline
    RE: MOTU-ASIO or WDM 2004/02/17 14:40:02 (permalink)
    but they still like PCs better than most other manufacturers.

    Eric


    Very true...
    My Motu unit runs circles around my old Echo drivers / card on my PC.
    #12
    michael japan
    Max Output Level: -22.5 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 5252
    • Joined: 2004/01/29 03:01:03
    • Status: offline
    RE: MOTU-ASIO or WDM 2004/02/17 21:59:10 (permalink)
    Thanks for input John. Point taken. I think Graham's intentions were to say that MOTU has put a bit more into their MAC presentation than Windows. I think you can tell that by the manual as well. I've had colleagues that up until the last year or so had problems with different MOTU interfaces on their PC's, yet with MAC and Cubase there were no issues. They are professionals and didn't want to wait around so went back to MAC because it worked smoothly. I agree that the MOTU works great with PC. Maybe it should have read "liked MAC better". Actually back to the main thread, do you use ASIO or WDM drivers when running Sonar?
    < Message edited by michael japan -- 2/17/2004 10:00:52 PM >
    #13
    michael japan
    Max Output Level: -22.5 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 5252
    • Joined: 2004/01/29 03:01:03
    • Status: offline
    RE: MOTU-ASIO or WDM 2004/02/17 22:01:37 (permalink)
    my MOTU is way better than my echo as well. Back to the thread-do you use ASIO or WDM drivers?
    #14
    rossipsu1
    Max Output Level: -70 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 1030
    • Joined: 2004/02/02 10:16:20
    • Location: Philadelphia, PA
    • Status: offline
    RE: MOTU-ASIO or WDM 2004/02/17 22:46:43 (permalink)
    my MOTU is way better than my echo as well. Back to the thread-do you use ASIO or WDM drivers


    I started with the WDM drivers when I moved to XP because of Sonars recommendation, and haven't looked back. I have had no issues with latency or performance thus never found a need to even load the ASIO drivers. I probably should load them, just to A / B the performance. Mind you, I record audio at 24 / 44.

    I haven't jumped on board with the higher sampling rates quite yet. I think it gets overhyped, to some degree. A lot of my friends with small home studios jumped on this bandwagon the second it became available. CPU efficiency, latency, disk space, etc, all got expensed in the tradeoff. In the same breath, they we're using cheap, non quad cables, didn't know how to phase mic drums, and couldn't tune or treat their mixing space.

    I'm gonna start recording some projects at 48 Khz. I'm interested to see how my system performs as a whole.
    #15
    michael japan
    Max Output Level: -22.5 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 5252
    • Joined: 2004/01/29 03:01:03
    • Status: offline
    RE: MOTU-ASIO or WDM 2004/02/17 22:54:09 (permalink)
    thanks rossipsu1. This is basically what I was waiting to hear. I've found the WDM to be more stable. I record 24/44 as well. Got too much to do to jump at the latest whim. Only switched fulltime to 24 less than a year ago because I had started so many projects at 16. That was definitely worth it, but will wait as well before changing to another format.
    #16
    burak
    Max Output Level: -84 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 303
    • Joined: 2003/11/07 20:00:00
    • Status: offline
    RE: MOTU-ASIO or WDM 2004/03/10 09:59:01 (permalink)
    I was using WDM/Ks earlier(on my 2Ghz Pentium 4 Laptop), but lately I am running ASIO drivers with the buffersize 512 on my new DAW(AMD 3000+).
    This machine has a Via chipset Firewire and it had some problems with Maudio uno MIDI interface. I unhooked the Uno MIDI and run MOTU 828
    with 512 buffers ASIO and works like a charm now. I record 24/44.1 and usually go up to 16-18 trax on projects. 2-3 aux busses with reverb, delay and about 8-10 inserts mostly compressors and a multiband comp at the end, all work seemless.
    I like MOTU, even though I have the earlier model without the MIDI.
    #17
    Scott Lee
    Max Output Level: -68 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 1120
    • Joined: 2003/11/13 23:13:38
    • Location: Hollywood, California
    • Status: offline
    RE: MOTU-ASIO or WDM 2004/03/10 16:45:35 (permalink)
    Have a MOTU 1224 using the PCI-424 drivers (yes they work on the {PCI-324 cards) and use ASIO. I do 50-65 audio tracks and around 10 vsti's and 20 effects or so on average daily and have fantastic results.

    Best,
    < Message edited by Scott Lee -- 3/10/2004 4:46:35 PM >

    Scott Lee (ASCAP)
    SFX Media 
    Song Composer / Engineer / Audio Director

    http://www.youtube.com/user/Dezacrator?feature=mhee

    #18
    Raymond Wave
    Max Output Level: -87 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 151
    • Joined: 2003/11/07 02:39:17
    • Location: Helsinki, Finland
    • Status: offline
    RE: MOTU-ASIO or WDM 2004/03/11 02:42:06 (permalink)
    I've always ended up using ASIO with my MotU 2408mk3/PCI-424. I've noticed WDM being somewhat less "stable", than ASIO. On my previous machine, it created some strange feedback noise when playing a loop (after first loop). Now i've got a new machine and had a quick test only with WDM, but it seemed to work better now. Still I've sticked with ASIO as it just seems more stable.


    Cheers,
    raymond.
    #19
    HMusikk
    Max Output Level: -81 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 463
    • Joined: 2003/11/09 16:08:37
    • Status: offline
    RE: MOTU-ASIO or WDM 2004/03/11 03:00:51 (permalink)
    I have a 24 I/O and use it with the ASIO driver....

    Gunnar Hustvedt
    http://www.h-musikk.no/english.html
     
    ASUS X99-E, Socket-2011-3,Intel Core i7-6850K, Noctua NH-U9S CPU Cooler, Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2133MHz 16GB, Samsung 960 EVO 250GB M.2 PCIe SSD (System), Samsung 850 EVO 500GB 2.5" SSD (Data), Samsung 850 EVO 1TB 2.5" SSD (Sample), WD Desktop Black 1TB 3.5" (Audio), Gigabyte GeForce GTX 1060 3GB Windforce, Corsair RM750x 750W PSU, Samsung 34" LED Curved C34F791, Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64-bit, Lynx AES16e, Aurora 16, Sonar Platinum, Pro Tools 12, Studio One 3
    #20
    jtmakse
    Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 4
    • Joined: 2003/12/02 22:59:51
    • Status: offline
    RE: MOTU-ASIO or WDM 2004/03/31 12:38:13 (permalink)
    I have the MOTU 1224 and I run on a XP Home edition P4 2.0Ghz with 512M Ram. My MOTU installation disks are for Win 95 or 98 only. So I have the update from Motu and I do not see where I use thw ASIO drivers. Where do I get these drivers? Because I can not get the 1224 to work usuing the PCI-324 wav drivers. Any questions or help would be greatly appreciated.
    Thanks,
    John
    #21
    koolbass
    Max Output Level: -73 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 853
    • Joined: 2003/11/13 23:27:43
    • Location: Nashville, TN
    • Status: offline
    RE: MOTU-ASIO or WDM 2004/03/31 12:58:35 (permalink)
    I also use a MOTU 896 with wdm drivers, and my current project is running 30 trax with 19 plug-ins. But I have adjusted my latency up some while I mixing down. But I've been quite happy with my MOTU
    #22
    stillfox
    Max Output Level: -72 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 938
    • Joined: 2003/11/07 00:52:22
    • Status: offline
    RE: MOTU-ASIO or WDM 2004/03/31 13:01:48 (permalink)
    I've got a MOTU 896 and an 828mkII and am using WDM drivers with no complaints.
    #23
    koolbass
    Max Output Level: -73 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 853
    • Joined: 2003/11/13 23:27:43
    • Location: Nashville, TN
    • Status: offline
    RE: MOTU-ASIO or WDM 2004/03/31 13:26:09 (permalink)
    I just got finished checking my "aud.ini" and my "KsUseInputEvent=1" was already in place. But I don't remember changing that value, so it may have been done when I loaded the MOTU WDM drivers. One curious thing I would like to mention, is when I would open up Project5 using the MOTU 896 and a midiman 1x1 usb, I was unable to get the audio to play back from the demo trax. I was able to get playback using th Echo Indigo pcmcia card for audio. BUT, when I changed the MOTU drivers to SoundDriver, I was able to hear audio. Even the asio drivers didn't work. A curious thing, but that's what worked for me.
    #24
    MickiG
    Max Output Level: -85 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 273
    • Joined: 2003/11/18 17:15:08
    • Location: Gold Coast Australia
    • Status: offline
    RE: MOTU-ASIO or WDM 2004/03/31 15:15:47 (permalink)
    I have the original Motu 828 and have used both ASIO and WDM drivers in both Cuebase SX and Sonar version 3 producer
    I find the WDM to be less hassle and really are the best for Sonar3 producer
    In Sonar 3 I found the Asio driver didn't want to work at all.
    I must say to all the Motu bashers I Bought my Motu 828 over 2 years ago, I plugged in installed drivers no problems have been using it faultlessly for the whole 2 years with out a single problem.
    I plan to upgrade to 2 of the new 828 mark II units, mainly for more inputs.



    You can listen to my music here
    http://www.soundclick.com/bands/5/mickigmusic.htm

    Sometimes, thought hits me.
    Life hurts! get used to it.
    #25
    Phrauge
    Max Output Level: -19.5 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 5562
    • Joined: 2003/11/06 11:38:29
    • Location: Texas
    • Status: offline
    RE: MOTU-ASIO or WDM 2004/03/31 15:35:26 (permalink)
    Im using an original 2408 mk1 (PCI-324) with WDM drivers. No problems. I, too, am considering either a second 2408 or 24i for extra inputs.
    #26
    Jump to:
    © 2025 APG vNext Commercial Version 5.1