ryannadon
Max Output Level: -89 dBFS
- Total Posts : 67
- Joined: 2010/05/15 16:32:17
- Location: Alberta, Canada
- Status: offline
Mac Vs. PC for your DAW??
Hello all, I was at a "Pro" studio a few days ago speaking with the studio owner. He's been in the business for many years, so I spent some time picking his brain about gear and techniques, etc, etc... When I started talking about the rig that I use at home, a PC, Sonar based rig, he told me that I should get rid of my current setup, and buy a Mac based Pro tools system. While I understand that he's been using that particular setup for years, and he's very familiar and comfortable with it, it made me question how I chose the gear I did. I went with a PC because I've built many PC's, they're cheap compared to a Mac, easy to upgrade, and maybe it's just me, but I can't hear a difference between music made on a PC vs. a Mac. So, why is a Mac "better"? As for the DAW, I have Pro Tools 8, and 9. My opinion is that unless you have a $10,000+ Pro Tools HD rig, (which I don't) Sonar is a much better, more flexible, and easier to use DAW. I tried to like Pro Tools as I wanted to be familiar with the "industry standard" but I just don't like it. So, I didn't by PT 10. Also, AVID strikes me as somewhat money grubbing.... So I'm wondering what people think when it comes to Mac Vs. PC in the recording world. Which is better? Why? Same with their DAWs. What do you think of PT as the industry standard? Would Sonar make a better industry standard? Ryan
|
timidi
Max Output Level: -21 dBFS
- Total Posts : 5449
- Joined: 2006/04/11 12:55:15
- Location: SE Florida
- Status: offline
Re:Mac Vs. PC for your DAW??
2012/03/10 18:37:12
(permalink)
|
StepD
Max Output Level: -79 dBFS
- Total Posts : 594
- Joined: 2003/11/08 01:03:52
- Status: offline
Re:Mac Vs. PC for your DAW??
2012/03/10 18:56:28
(permalink)
Macs and PT both go to 11
Core2 6600 2.40 GHz, ASUS P5B Deluxe, 8GB RAM, GeForce GT 630 2GB, 3 Seagate Sata, Echo AudioFire 4 asio, Windows 10 Pro 64-bit, Sonar Platinum, Cakewalk by Bandlab
|
BlixYZ
Max Output Level: -74 dBFS
- Total Posts : 805
- Joined: 2010/12/31 16:45:54
- Location: Barrington, NJ
- Status: offline
Re:Mac Vs. PC for your DAW??
2012/03/10 18:58:16
(permalink)
I have run a small professional studio for 6 years near Philadelphia. People are always telling me to "go mac". I bought a mac and pro tools (I started with 8- now I have 10) and I have tried to like it. Pro Tools is not as good a DAW as Sonar. Not as flexible or as full-featured. I cannot get over the fact that I can't turn off input monitoring so that I can just use latency-free hardware monitoring. Three other engineers also work in my studio. All have some familiarity with pro tools (two are Logic guys, the other other is a real PT guy) All three of them use Sonar most of the time. I have a Windows and Mac setup side by side all the recording hardware and outboard gear are shared between the two via patch bays. That Mac hasn't gotten much use (yet) and has not even paid for itself yet. Maybe if Sonar makes a MAC version that will fix the problem! So far, I am not impressed with either. I think I'd be a lot happier if we were running Logic on that Mac. Working out of my studio has made quite a few fans of Sonar by people who are otherwise all about MAC products.
|
carlosagm79
Max Output Level: -84 dBFS
- Total Posts : 301
- Joined: 2011/02/07 00:35:29
- Status: offline
Re:Mac Vs. PC for your DAW??
2012/03/10 18:59:16
(permalink)
|
Zo
Max Output Level: -25 dBFS
- Total Posts : 5036
- Joined: 2008/01/25 20:49:55
- Status: offline
Re:Mac Vs. PC for your DAW??
2012/03/10 19:23:35
(permalink)
1024 st + s950 .....mmm back in dayz ...the good old one !! to make it short : MAC = PC Windows not equal OSX Not need to go mac if you think it's gonna be better as this will not be the case , if you like the style, design , ergonmy on the osx side ...good...if you're just about the best system .....well go for it , and this is not specially a mac pro !
For sale (PM me) : transfert ilok includedEventide Ultrachannel make offersSoftube Summit EQIK Neve 1081 , Neve precision Comp/LimEastWest GoshtwriterSoundforge Pro 12
|
Jeff Evans
Max Output Level: -24 dBFS
- Total Posts : 5139
- Joined: 2009/04/13 18:20:16
- Location: Ballarat, Australia
- Status: offline
Re:Mac Vs. PC for your DAW??
2012/03/10 19:29:22
(permalink)
People make the mistake of thinking they need to choose the platform first but this is not the case. You choose the software program you want to use first. Then choose the patform to go with it. If it is a program that runs on both, then you have a choice. But some programs eg Logic dictate the platform so you have to go with that. eg If it's Sonar then you have to go PC etc...
Specs i5-2500K 3.5 Ghz - 8 Gb RAM - Win 7 64 bit - ATI Radeon HD6900 Series - RME PCI HDSP9632 - Steinberg Midex 8 Midi interface - Faderport 8- Studio One V4 - iMac 2.5Ghz Core i5 - Sierra 10.12.6 - Focusrite Clarett thunderbolt interface Poor minds talk about people, average minds talk about events, great minds talk about ideas -Eleanor Roosevelt
|
listen
Max Output Level: -79 dBFS
- Total Posts : 593
- Joined: 2008/09/12 06:07:55
- Status: offline
Re:Mac Vs. PC for your DAW??
2012/03/10 19:47:31
(permalink)
They both produce WAVE Files which for the most part are exchangeable between programs - if you know how to capture it great going in and mix it well after you have it captured - the listening music world won't know the difference and more importantly won't ask what the music was recorded with; therefore, I am familiar with PC and have chosen to work with it over the years. I have friends who swear by MAC but when it comes down to it we share wave files and make the best of what we are using.... Just saying.
- Listen - FOH Mixer & Recording Studio Manager Nothing but the grace of God - mggtg. VS 700C - R / CONSOLE 1 / NEVE PORTICO 5017 / TASCAM UH-7000 / SONAR PLATINUM / REASON RECORD 9 / VMP 2 / UREI 7110's / UA LA-610 MkII / AUDIENT ASP 880 / CREATION STATION 450 V 5 WINDOWS 10 / HOME 64 - BIT / SKYLAKE CORE i7 (i7 - 6700, 4 CORES/8 THREADS)
|
trimph1
Max Output Level: -12 dBFS
- Total Posts : 6348
- Joined: 2010/09/07 19:20:06
- Location: London ON
- Status: offline
Re:Mac Vs. PC for your DAW??
2012/03/10 20:05:46
(permalink)
VAX/VMS FTW!!!!! To me both are just as good as each other. They do things differently, yes, but that is just it...difference does not equal better than/worse than....
The space you have will always be exceeded in direct proportion to the amount of stuff you have...Thornton's Postulate. Bushpianos
|
strikinglyhandsome1
Max Output Level: -3 dBFS
- Total Posts : 7224
- Joined: 2006/11/15 09:21:12
- Status: offline
Re:Mac Vs. PC for your DAW??
2012/03/10 20:07:32
(permalink)
If Mozart was alive today he'd be using a Mac and be wearing a USB wig.
|
listen
Max Output Level: -79 dBFS
- Total Posts : 593
- Joined: 2008/09/12 06:07:55
- Status: offline
Re:Mac Vs. PC for your DAW??
2012/03/10 20:09:06
(permalink)
strikinglyhandsome1 If Mozart was alive today he'd be using a Mac and be wearing a USB wig. LOL
- Listen - FOH Mixer & Recording Studio Manager Nothing but the grace of God - mggtg. VS 700C - R / CONSOLE 1 / NEVE PORTICO 5017 / TASCAM UH-7000 / SONAR PLATINUM / REASON RECORD 9 / VMP 2 / UREI 7110's / UA LA-610 MkII / AUDIENT ASP 880 / CREATION STATION 450 V 5 WINDOWS 10 / HOME 64 - BIT / SKYLAKE CORE i7 (i7 - 6700, 4 CORES/8 THREADS)
|
timidi
Max Output Level: -21 dBFS
- Total Posts : 5449
- Joined: 2006/04/11 12:55:15
- Location: SE Florida
- Status: offline
Re:Mac Vs. PC for your DAW??
2012/03/10 20:16:45
(permalink)
Gotta say, if I had the money and time, I would go full bore apple pro tools rig (or, at least Logic). To me, that is the bottom line (money). To be honest, I've never tried Pro tools. But, it is the industry standard for a reason. My main reason for this thinking is the Macbook Pro that I'm typing this on I've had for 3 years and has never caused me a single bit of grief. I remember the days of HP and dells and such and it was always a nightmare. This box just works all the time... It's inspiring not getting in the way. As I said, I really don't know if an apple DAW rig is better, but, I'd sure like the opportunity to find out. All that said, If you're doing just audio, I think anything will work. But, PC midi sucks.
|
Re:Mac Vs. PC for your DAW??
2012/03/11 04:44:20
(permalink)
My PC Audio Labe DAW never gets in the way of my creativity. Ever. I turn it on and inside of 20-30 seconds I'm on the desktop, launching SONAR, and setting up a project. The idea that PCs, 'get in the way', or, 'are not creative' is outdated, IMHO. A well built and well tuned (which is not hard to do) Win7 x64 PC is a rock solid DAW, IMHO. SP
|
Lanceindastudio
Max Output Level: -29 dBFS
- Total Posts : 4604
- Joined: 2004/01/22 02:28:30
- Status: offline
Re:Mac Vs. PC for your DAW??
2012/03/11 04:49:38
(permalink)
Asus P8Z77-V LE PLUS Motherboard i7 3770k CPU 32 gigs RAM Presonus AudioBox iTwo Windows 10 64 bit, SONAR PLATINUM 64 bit Lots of plugins and softsynths and one shot samples, loops Gauge ECM-87, MCA SP-1, Alesis AM51 Presonus Eureka Mackie HR824's and matching subwoofer
|
bobguitkillerleft
Max Output Level: -72 dBFS
- Total Posts : 944
- Joined: 2011/05/17 17:28:58
- Location: Adelaide Australia
- Status: offline
Re:Mac Vs. PC for your DAW??
2012/03/11 05:16:58
(permalink)
Mac Pro has NOT been updated since July 2010. The Windows PC" not as good" rubbish is OLD NEWS since W7 x64 SP1 and Sandy Bridge.
https://soundcloud.com/rks26https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Hitmen Lenovo W540 Factoryrefurb SONAR PLATINUM,Ozone 7 N.I. KA6 Komplete 9 SSD4 Platinum Epi L/H LP Custom Headstock broken twice and fixed.Gibson L/H Les Paul 2010 Wine Red Studio stupid Right Hand Vol.Tone for Left Hand?LH84Ibanez RS135 gen.FloydRose JB Marshall 100w 2203 4x25w Celestion Green backs "You are what you is"-Frank Zappa "But I'm gonna wave my freak flag high"-Jimi Hendrix
|
Re:Mac Vs. PC for your DAW??
2012/03/11 05:23:00
(permalink)
bobguitkillerleft Mac Pro has NOT been updated since July 2010. The Windows PC" not as good" rubbish is OLD NEWS since W7 x64 SP1 and Sandy Bridge. Dual-socket Sandy Bridge is a revelation for music making. I did a demo on NAMM on an HP Z800 with that inside and my project was 25 tracks, 12 busses, 12 soft synths, 67 ProChannel modules, and 17 additional VST plugins. The system was using an OctaCapture at 44.1khz with a 64 sample/ 1.1ms Input Latency and the 24 cores sat at 10-12%. Pretty awesome, IMHO. SP
|
auricle
Max Output Level: -81 dBFS
- Total Posts : 492
- Joined: 2007/02/25 09:36:32
- Location: English expat in Moscow/Russia
- Status: offline
Re:Mac Vs. PC for your DAW??
2012/03/11 05:35:17
(permalink)
Just a slight off-topic, if you don't mind. Seth, how quiet are the HP Z800 machines? I'm talking about fan and HDD noise. One of the things I like to do with a PC is mod it with quieter components but anything with custom components makes it more difficult.
Seth Perlstein [Cakewalk ] bobguitkillerleft Mac Pro has NOT been updated since July 2010. The Windows PC" not as good" rubbish is OLD NEWS since W7 x64 SP1 and Sandy Bridge. Dual-socket Sandy Bridge is a revelation for music making. I did a demo on NAMM on an HP Z800 with that inside and my project was 25 tracks, 12 busses, 12 soft synths, 67 ProChannel modules, and 17 additional VST plugins. The system was using an OctaCapture at 44.1khz with a 64 sample/ 1.1ms Input Latency and the 24 cores sat at 10-12%. Pretty awesome, IMHO. SP
|
Re:Mac Vs. PC for your DAW??
2012/03/11 05:38:52
(permalink)
auricle Just a slight off-topic, if you don't mind. Seth, how quiet are the HP Z800 machines? I'm talking about fan and HDD noise. One of the things I like to do with a PC is mod it with quieter components but anything with custom components makes it more difficult. Seth Perlstein [Cakewalk ] bobguitkillerleft Mac Pro has NOT been updated since July 2010. The Windows PC" not as good" rubbish is OLD NEWS since W7 x64 SP1 and Sandy Bridge. Dual-socket Sandy Bridge is a revelation for music making. I did a demo on NAMM on an HP Z800 with that inside and my project was 25 tracks, 12 busses, 12 soft synths, 67 ProChannel modules, and 17 additional VST plugins. The system was using an OctaCapture at 44.1khz with a 64 sample/ 1.1ms Input Latency and the 24 cores sat at 10-12%. Pretty awesome, IMHO. SP I honestly don't know. I used the Z800 in the Roland Arena at NAMM, shich is a very loud place, so didn't really get a chance to look into that aspect of the system. SP
|
bobguitkillerleft
Max Output Level: -72 dBFS
- Total Posts : 944
- Joined: 2011/05/17 17:28:58
- Location: Adelaide Australia
- Status: offline
Re:Mac Vs. PC for your DAW??
2012/03/11 05:51:17
(permalink)
So Seth,that would have been a "Dual 6 core" Xeon [24 virtual cores]? Just wait until Daw builders go for the Dual 8 core Xeons[32 virtual cores],Scott from ADK tested ONE on a single socket board,and it was able to use DOUBLE the amount of plugins than a stock i7 2600k[which is already more than powerfull enough] My Cooler Master "Silenco 550" case is super quiet as it has foam "silencing" on both sides, front,and underneath,it also runs under 35c at 70 -90% load overclocked,with just a 30 dollar cpu cooler.
https://soundcloud.com/rks26https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Hitmen Lenovo W540 Factoryrefurb SONAR PLATINUM,Ozone 7 N.I. KA6 Komplete 9 SSD4 Platinum Epi L/H LP Custom Headstock broken twice and fixed.Gibson L/H Les Paul 2010 Wine Red Studio stupid Right Hand Vol.Tone for Left Hand?LH84Ibanez RS135 gen.FloydRose JB Marshall 100w 2203 4x25w Celestion Green backs "You are what you is"-Frank Zappa "But I'm gonna wave my freak flag high"-Jimi Hendrix
|
FastBikerBoy
Forum Host
- Total Posts : 11326
- Joined: 2008/01/25 16:15:36
- Location: Watton, Norfolk, UK
- Status: offline
Re:Mac Vs. PC for your DAW??
2012/03/11 06:43:24
(permalink)
You're as likely to get a balanced view on here about Macs as you did a balanced view from the studio owner you spoke to. i.e. you won't. I really believe that platform nowadays is irrelevant, as is the software. If you can't make music on either platform with any of the major DAWs available, give up. That's my advice...
|
JSkeen
Max Output Level: -78 dBFS
- Total Posts : 612
- Joined: 2007/02/01 17:13:49
- Location: USA
- Status: offline
Re:Mac Vs. PC for your DAW??
2012/03/11 06:48:52
(permalink)
My question is if you can only make music on a mac with pro tools and or logic why does Sonar still exist? Why does Cubase, Samplitude, Studio One and various others still exist. Companies are in business to make money and I am sure if no one was buying Sonar it would have went away by now. Even Digital Performer is coming to windows. Personally I have written tons of songs on my windows computers. I have mastered hundreds of projects and never have I felt the need to "go mac" or "go pro tools". These topics really get under my skin.
|
bobguitkillerleft
Max Output Level: -72 dBFS
- Total Posts : 944
- Joined: 2011/05/17 17:28:58
- Location: Adelaide Australia
- Status: offline
Re:Mac Vs. PC for your DAW??
2012/03/11 07:10:14
(permalink)
https://soundcloud.com/rks26https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Hitmen Lenovo W540 Factoryrefurb SONAR PLATINUM,Ozone 7 N.I. KA6 Komplete 9 SSD4 Platinum Epi L/H LP Custom Headstock broken twice and fixed.Gibson L/H Les Paul 2010 Wine Red Studio stupid Right Hand Vol.Tone for Left Hand?LH84Ibanez RS135 gen.FloydRose JB Marshall 100w 2203 4x25w Celestion Green backs "You are what you is"-Frank Zappa "But I'm gonna wave my freak flag high"-Jimi Hendrix
|
stingie@tstt.net.tt
Max Output Level: -80 dBFS
- Total Posts : 541
- Joined: 2003/11/28 15:23:53
- Location: Deep Space
- Status: offline
Re:Mac Vs. PC for your DAW??
2012/03/11 07:11:34
(permalink)
The most stable system I have earned honestly is an iMac with OS 10.6.8 and Bootcamp with Sonar X1 expanded latest update installed. I believe I have found the Holy Grail. No kidding.
Nice Tracks Recording Studio. Intel Dual core 13ins i5 MacBook Pro 2.5 Ghz. Quad core i5, Win 7 home premium 64 bit, 8 Ghz memory, 2 WD Caviar Black 7200 HDs. G-Tech hard drives, M-Audio Axiom 25, Fender Stratocaster guitar, Focusrite Saffire Pro 24 DSP firewire audio interface.
|
Rain
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 9736
- Joined: 2003/11/07 05:10:12
- Location: Las Vegas
- Status: offline
Re:Mac Vs. PC for your DAW??
2012/03/11 07:25:57
(permalink)
bobguitkillerleft The whole MacPro Protools deal is OUTDATED,I nearly went that route after being hounded by the mantra,I'm soo glad I didn't though and researched thoroughly,and saved myself a lot of hassle etc Also check this :.http://www.dawbench.com/win7-v-osx-5.htm It may not be cutting edge but it is far from outdated. MacPros are still used every day here for mission critical application, live. I guess I better tell all the crew that they should be spending more of their time online reading about all the latest processor upgrades and comparing benchmarks instead of just relying on what consistently works. It's about time someone tells them that what they are using doesn't really work by today's standards, short of them noticing it... ;)
TCB - Tea, Cats, Books...
|
stingie@tstt.net.tt
Max Output Level: -80 dBFS
- Total Posts : 541
- Joined: 2003/11/28 15:23:53
- Location: Deep Space
- Status: offline
Re:Mac Vs. PC for your DAW??
2012/03/11 07:34:19
(permalink)
The most stable system I have earned honestly is an iMac with OS 10.6.8 and Bootcamp with Sonar X1 expanded latest update installed. I believe I have found the Holy Grail. No kidding.
Nice Tracks Recording Studio. Intel Dual core 13ins i5 MacBook Pro 2.5 Ghz. Quad core i5, Win 7 home premium 64 bit, 8 Ghz memory, 2 WD Caviar Black 7200 HDs. G-Tech hard drives, M-Audio Axiom 25, Fender Stratocaster guitar, Focusrite Saffire Pro 24 DSP firewire audio interface.
|
bobguitkillerleft
Max Output Level: -72 dBFS
- Total Posts : 944
- Joined: 2011/05/17 17:28:58
- Location: Adelaide Australia
- Status: offline
Re:Mac Vs. PC for your DAW??
2012/03/11 07:55:25
(permalink)
Facepalm,Im saying the IDEA/RULE/MANTRA that in order to do computer hardisk recording that a Mac and PT is the only way, IS OUTDATED! The fact that Apple haven't updated the MacPro since July 2010,speaks for itself,as does PT HDX only able to be run on a Nehalem/Westermere MacPro,when the soon to be released Sandy Bridge Xeon Seth P. was lucky enough to use,is according to "intels press release":"New server processors deliver up to 80 percent improved performance compared to the prior generation". And as we speak Daw builders are using these babies...........what is Apple doing? Dropping the MacPro!
post edited by bobguitkillerleft - 2012/03/11 08:33:37
https://soundcloud.com/rks26https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Hitmen Lenovo W540 Factoryrefurb SONAR PLATINUM,Ozone 7 N.I. KA6 Komplete 9 SSD4 Platinum Epi L/H LP Custom Headstock broken twice and fixed.Gibson L/H Les Paul 2010 Wine Red Studio stupid Right Hand Vol.Tone for Left Hand?LH84Ibanez RS135 gen.FloydRose JB Marshall 100w 2203 4x25w Celestion Green backs "You are what you is"-Frank Zappa "But I'm gonna wave my freak flag high"-Jimi Hendrix
|
Rain
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 9736
- Joined: 2003/11/07 05:10:12
- Location: Las Vegas
- Status: offline
Re:Mac Vs. PC for your DAW??
2012/03/11 08:39:30
(permalink)
Cooler Master Silenco 550 i7 2600K @ 4.5 GHz Zalman CNPS5X cooler GA-Z68XP-UD3[rev.1] Powercolor 6770[two24"mon.] 16GB RAM,W7Prox64,2x1TB Seagate Barracuda Facepalm. I use a computer. A Mac. I play a Les Paul not a custom two-piece maple top attached with ultra-strong Franklin Titebond 50 glue to a non-chambered mahogany body equipped with vintage Kluson-style tuners with pearloid tulip buttons. It's not my job to worry about the merits of Titebond 50 - I'll leave that to the factory employees, me I have music to write. They do their job, I do mine, and as long as the glue works and the guitar sounds good, I'll not argue about its merits over those of the new Titebond 50 HV, even if the HV is 3 to 5 times thicker. Agreed that the PT on Mac paradigm is becoming a thing of the past - there's many alternatives. As for Apple dropping the Mac Pro... I don't get this. People really think that Apple will give up on professional computers?
TCB - Tea, Cats, Books...
|
Re:Mac Vs. PC for your DAW??
2012/03/11 08:44:52
(permalink)
The thing is, Macs are PCs. They use the same hardware (Foxxcon motherboards, Intel chipsets, and Intel CPUs). The only difference is the OS. So, if you're using a Mac and Windows via Bootcamp, you're basically using a PC. Apple is simply another hardware vendor like HP, Dell, etc., except that they also make their own OS (sort of, since its Linux based and they didn't make Linux). SP
|
John T
Max Output Level: -7.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 6783
- Joined: 2006/06/12 10:24:39
- Status: offline
Re:Mac Vs. PC for your DAW??
2012/03/11 08:52:03
(permalink)
I think Jeff nailed it really; the question should start with what you actually want to do and how you want to do it, and then make your decision. Neither one is inherently better than the other.
http://johntatlockaudio.com/Self-build PC // 16GB RAM // i7 3770k @ 3.5 Ghz // Nofan 0dB cooler // ASUS P8-Z77 V Pro motherboard // Intel x-25m SSD System Drive // Seagate RAID Array Audio Drive // Windows 10 64 bit // Sonar Platinum (64 bit) // Sonar VS-700 // M-Audio Keystation Pro 88 // KRK RP-6 Monitors // and a bunch of other stuff
|
strikinglyhandsome1
Max Output Level: -3 dBFS
- Total Posts : 7224
- Joined: 2006/11/15 09:21:12
- Status: offline
Re:Mac Vs. PC for your DAW??
2012/03/11 09:00:44
(permalink)
It's still handy to have the weekly debate. People who have lived under a rock or have come out of a coma recently should still have the chance to debate the issue.
|