Mackie HDR24 Vs Alesis HD24

Author
manciosax
Max Output Level: -88 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 103
  • Joined: 2003/11/07 13:43:51
  • Status: offline
2004/03/10 12:16:27 (permalink)

Mackie HDR24 Vs Alesis HD24

Hallo friends, i would like to buy one of those two babies, is there anyone using them, may i have some feedback from you?
I actually work with a Motu2408MKIII but at the moment i'm doing a lot of live stuff so one of them should be more comfortable to bring up and down. Thank in advance to all. Maurizio - www.digitallcube.com
#1

28 Replies Related Threads

    Twin Paradox
    Max Output Level: -89 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 61
    • Joined: 2004/01/26 08:42:14
    • Status: offline
    RE: Mackie HDR24 Vs Alesis HD24 2004/03/10 14:57:50 (permalink)
    manciosax -

    I have the Alesis HD24, have had it since April 2002, and use it a lot for live recordings. I then transfer the recordings into my computer using the Fireport firewire connector for mixing etc. in Sonar & WaveLab.

    I don't know much about the Mackie unit except that when I was shopping almost two years ago it lost out to the Alesis on features and price. I think they are similar, but have some significant differences. I think the Mackie is more of a stand alone DAW (with monitor, keyboard etc.), whereas the Alesis is primarily a recording device and more suited to situations like mine where one just wants to get the recordings on it, but do the mixing elsewhere. I think the Alesis is also far more flexible regarding the recording media (hard disks) it uses. It is also less expensive, by a lot I think.

    Are there some specific questions do you have about the Alesis?

    Twin Paradox
    #2
    dell5gbr
    Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 25
    • Joined: 2003/11/21 11:51:33
    • Location: Manchester, England
    • Status: offline
    RE: Mackie HDR24 Vs Alesis HD24 2004/03/10 15:40:10 (permalink)
    I've had a Mackie24/96 for the last year and to be honest suits me fine, I tend to use it as a recorder to bounce tracks back into Sonar in the studio and also record live guitar and vocals throught an ADC into the lightpipe inputs. There are a lot of features that I don't use though and couldn't offer an 'across the board' comparisson.

    Mackie have recently updated the bios so that it can take up to 60gig hd's and if you check out on the Mackie forum there were (the last time I looked) a lot of discussions about where the best places to get alternative media are. Also it seems that they have come down in price somewhat since I bought mine (argh!)

    Sorry if this isn't much use, but I'm happy with the performance that I get from the Mackie and would recommend one if its got the features you want
    #3
    manciosax
    Max Output Level: -88 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 103
    • Joined: 2003/11/07 13:43:51
    • Status: offline
    RE: Mackie HDR24 Vs Alesis HD24 2004/03/12 04:40:11 (permalink)
    Hallo twin,
    first of all thanks for your mail!
    I have one more question. I want to use the HD24 like you but my problem is to monitor the sound while i'm recording, in other words con does the sound on analog 1 can be routed in realtime to out adat 1?
    This is my sugnal routign:
    Mic - preamp - analog input HD24xr (now motu 2408MK3) - adat output from HD24xr to adat in mixer DDX32/16.
    Is it possible?
    Do the converters sound good? Can you make any comparison with Motu MK3?

    Thanks again for your HELP!!!!!!!!
    Mancio
    #4
    Twin Paradox
    Max Output Level: -89 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 61
    • Joined: 2004/01/26 08:42:14
    • Status: offline
    RE: Mackie HDR24 Vs Alesis HD24 2004/03/12 05:26:23 (permalink)
    Mancio -

    Yes, you can monitor what is being recorded onto the HD24 in real time using either the ADAT outs (there are 3 banks of 8 ADAT i/o that you connect via optical cable) or the individual analog outs.

    The converters sound just fine to me, and I've seen some reviews of this device that mention the converters on this being very good. I can't compare it to the Motu myself.

    Twin Paradox
    #5
    ohhey
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 11676
    • Joined: 2003/11/06 16:24:07
    • Location: Fort Worth Texas USA
    • Status: offline
    RE: Mackie HDR24 Vs Alesis HD24 2004/03/12 10:24:26 (permalink)
    The Mackie HDR is more money then the Alesis HD24 because it does more. It has a display that you can use to do simple editing and makes tracking sessions a breeze. I wish there were a software version of that I could run on any PC. Here are some other things to consider.

    1. At 48K the HDR converters and input stage will sound a little better, at 96K the difference is less. However, the HD24 has to have an upgrade to record analog at 96K.

    2. HDR drives are FAT32 and you can read them via IDE (standard LianLi removable tray) or via a FireWire or USB2 enclosure with a LianLi tray mounted in it. The Alesis HD24 is a special format and can only be read via the HD24 or the FirePort adapter. The FirePort is a must have if you transfer files to the PC, FTP is up to the task. This could be an issue in the future if your FirePort breaks and you don't have access to the HD24 you can't get anything off the drive.

    3. The stock HDR can't use drives larger then 32gig. This was a VERY big deal till an update became available this year. It requires some skill to pull the bios chip and but in the new one, buy the upgrade is only about $50 and let's you use big drives just like the Alesis. I just upgraded one at a local studio and it works fine.
    < Message edited by ohhey -- 3/12/2004 10:25:32 AM >
    #6
    ohhey
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 11676
    • Joined: 2003/11/06 16:24:07
    • Location: Fort Worth Texas USA
    • Status: offline
    RE: Mackie HDR24 Vs Alesis HD24 2004/03/12 10:27:05 (permalink)
    ORIGINAL: Twin Paradox

    Mancio -

    Yes, you can monitor what is being recorded onto the HD24 in real time using either the ADAT outs (there are 3 banks of 8 ADAT i/o that you connect via optical cable) or the individual analog outs.

    The converters sound just fine to me, and I've seen some reviews of this device that mention the converters on this being very good. I can't compare it to the Motu myself.

    Twin Paradox


    I think both units have better sound then the MOTU. However, the Mackie sounds better at 48K. I don't know if it's the converters or the analog input stage my guess is both are better on the Mackie.
    #7
    LaptopPop
    Max Output Level: -73 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 853
    • Joined: 2003/11/05 19:37:17
    • Location: Long Beach, CA
    • Status: offline
    RE: Mackie HDR24 Vs Alesis HD24 2004/03/12 16:41:49 (permalink)
    Note that Mackie has two hard drive recorders - the HDR and the SDR. The SDR is newer. The HDR has connections for a keyboard and monitor, and includes full editing capabilities. The SDR is more a straightforward device.

    Both units, unlike the Alesis, store their data in a standard FAT32 disk using broadcast Wav files.

    They use removable hard disks. You can get a carrier for your computer (Lian-Li RH-58) from Directron.com for about 20 bucks. This means you can record on the Mackie, then pop the whole disk into your PC in one shot - wonderful bandwidth! You can then import the wave files into Sonar. If you turn the option on, Sonar will line up all the files where they belong in time automatically. It can take Sonar a little bit of time to import each wav file, but you can start it up and come back later with it all done.

    The HDR can "render" the files, the SDR cannot. What this means is that if you record something with lots of takes over the top of each other, the HDR can combine them into one file, while the SDR you have to get rid of the old takes manually. No biggie there, just a little manual work.

    I believe the update for the HRD lets it use disks up to 200 gigs or so, same as the SDR. All you need is cheapie IDE/ATA disks, but I always go ahead and get 7200 RPM disks with the 8meg buffer. They've gotten wonderfully cheap.

    The HDR is about $4k at Sweetwater.com, the SDR is $1300 at 8thstreet.com. Both handle 96kHz, 24 bit. Looks like there are two models of the Alesis -- a 48 kHz for about $1500 and a 96 kHz one for about $2k at sweetwater.com.

    -lee-
    #8
    Twin Paradox
    Max Output Level: -89 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 61
    • Joined: 2004/01/26 08:42:14
    • Status: offline
    RE: Mackie HDR24 Vs Alesis HD24 2004/03/12 22:19:06 (permalink)
    A couple of observations.

    Mackie has apparently decided to discontinue the SDR 24/96 (like the MDR before it) without a replacement. On the Mackie website it already shows up only under the discontinued products. It looks like only the HDR 24/96 is being continued as a product.

    I'm not sure what the real advantage is of the Mackie disk being FAT32 format versus the Alesis proprietery FST format. Sure you can set up a slot for a removable hard drive in your computer to insert the Mackie disk, assuming you have a slot available to do that. I suppose you could also set it up in an external Firewire/USB2 removable drive, but that's an added cost. Also, I doubt one is likely to use the drive for anything other than recording on the Mackie, so again I'm not sure that FAT32 format buys you much.

    Note also that the Alesis FST format is designed specifically for audio files to reduce seek time relative to that obtained with standard computer formats like FAT32.

    With the Alesis, using the Fireport connector, you can choose to transfer files to your computer via the Fireport as wav, aiff, sd2 or sd1 files. That is, the files are automatically converted to any of those formats as you copy them over to your computer. Similarly, you can move files that are in any of those formats (assuming they are mono, 24 bit) back over to the Alesis and it converts them automatically into the format that is used on the FST drive itself. You can also do some very rapid file management actions on the Alesis hard drive from your PC when it is connected via the Fireport.

    So, given the way anyone is likely to use these drives, I can't see what particular advantage the FAT32 format of the Mackie really gets you. Sounds nice in the ad, I suppose.

    Also, there are two removable drive slots in the Alesis, while the Mackie (I believe) has one fixed internal drive and one removable drive. The Alesis drives are hot-swappable (you don't have to turn the machine off to pull them out) and allow very rapid copying from one to the other for a quick backup.

    Twin Paradox
    #9
    ohhey
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 11676
    • Joined: 2003/11/06 16:24:07
    • Location: Fort Worth Texas USA
    • Status: offline
    RE: Mackie HDR24 Vs Alesis HD24 2004/03/12 23:34:58 (permalink)
    I guess it's a geek thing with FAT32 I don't think that would be the buying decision for most folks. Sound, price, and features should be the big issues. I still like the idea that I can read that drive on any computer without having to have some kind a gadget or a working HD24. If you were working with another studio they would not even need any equiptment to get the files off it just a computer with an unused IDE connection.
    #10
    Guitarmech111
    Max Output Level: -24.5 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 5085
    • Joined: 2003/11/06 10:18:53
    • Location: Bayou City, TX
    • Status: offline
    RE: Mackie HDR24 Vs Alesis HD24 2004/03/15 10:30:39 (permalink)
    With the Alesis, using the Fireport connector, you can choose to transfer files to your computer via the Fireport as wav, aiff, sd2 or sd1 files. That is, the files are automatically converted to any of those formats as you copy them over to your computer. Similarly, you can move files that are in any of those formats (assuming they are mono, 24 bit) back over to the Alesis and it converts them automatically into the format that is used on the FST drive itself. You can also do some very rapid file management actions on the Alesis hard drive from your PC when it is connected via the Fireport.


    This was one of the biggest features that caused me to get my HD24. Now if only Alesis can keep it in stock. I have been waiting 2 weeks for it to come.

    Considering I got both the HD24 and the Fireport for $1350 out the door, I'm not complaining yet.

    This transaction has me looking at GC sales a lot different. The followup of the guy who sold it to me is really bad. No one else at GC was able to pickup where this guy left off during his days off. Not even the manager. From now on, If GC doesn't have it in stock right there or in another store close by, I am not getting it.

    Peace,
    Conley Shepherd
    Joyful Noise Productions
    PC config: (Win performance base score = 7.7) ASUS Sabertooth 990 FX -amd fx-8150 - core processor am3+ - 32G Corsair 1066 DDR3 - PNY GTX670 2g gddr5 - Corsair Force SSD 120G - Samsung 750G SATA drives - WD 1tb Black (Audio files) - WD 2TB for storage - RME UFX - USB ASIO 2/2016 drivers Win8 

     
    Without a mess, there is no message
    #11
    New Member
    Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 26
    • Joined: 2003/12/19 13:07:33
    • Status: offline
    RE: Mackie HDR24 Vs Alesis HD24 2004/03/15 15:52:00 (permalink)
    Conley,
    You did fill out the free Fireport coupon and sent it in right? Or else you will be waiting forever, Alesis are the one's you must deal with for the free Fireport it does not come with the unit just reg it on their site and fill out offer and send it in took me a few weeks though to but it was free:)
    #12
    craigwilson
    Max Output Level: -86 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 201
    • Joined: 2003/11/16 20:58:55
    • Location: Cincinnati, Kentucky
    • Status: offline
    RE: Mackie HDR24 Vs Alesis HD24 2004/03/15 18:59:44 (permalink)
    ORIGINAL: New Member

    Conley,
    You did fill out the free Fireport coupon and sent it in right? Or else you will be waiting forever, Alesis are the one's you must deal with for the free Fireport it does not come with the unit just reg it on their site and fill out offer and send it in took me a few weeks though to but it was free:)


    I got mine very quickly from Alesis even though they said it was "backordered". I really like the Alesis HD24 and the fireport makes it sooo easy to transfer tracks. Very slick, very fast. Just what the doctor ordered!!

    Enjoy yourself, it's later than you might think.
    #13
    southern9999
    Max Output Level: -87 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 182
    • Joined: 2003/12/13 10:54:44
    • Status: offline
    RE: Mackie HDR24 Vs Alesis HD24 2004/03/15 23:48:26 (permalink)
    Curious, I thought you got it at that price still cause you had to drive across town to get it???

    That is a very good price to get it straight from the store, even though now its back ordered.

    The Audio Factor
    www.theaudiofactor.us
    #14
    jbs
    Max Output Level: -89 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 59
    • Joined: 2003/11/14 20:18:05
    • Status: offline
    RE: Mackie HDR24 Vs Alesis HD24 2004/03/16 04:08:23 (permalink)
    Hello
    Last year I was choosing a recorder to replace my ADAT xt and after much thinking I decided to buy the HD24. The reason behind this was
    a) driver size (no fix for using larger drives for the Mackie existed then) and most important
    b) FAT file system. As I understod it the Mackie cached about 15minutes of data then concatenated the pieces and started to cache again. If the power goes out during any point in those 15 minutes the file is corrupt and you loose up to 15 minutes. On the HD24 you loose only the very second you loose the power (I have tested it). For me doing liverecording it is a must that I do ot loose minutes if the power goes out. OK, I guess I could buy a UPS but it felt more safe using the HD24.
    Also,
    c) it is convinient to have tsr connection for all i/o.
    /Johan
    #15
    Guitarmech111
    Max Output Level: -24.5 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 5085
    • Joined: 2003/11/06 10:18:53
    • Location: Bayou City, TX
    • Status: offline
    RE: Mackie HDR24 Vs Alesis HD24 2004/03/16 10:51:30 (permalink)
    Curious, I thought you got it at that price still cause you had to drive across town to get it???


    That too.

    Just picked up the unit yesterday and 2 more caddies.

    Peace,
    Conley Shepherd
    Joyful Noise Productions
    PC config: (Win performance base score = 7.7) ASUS Sabertooth 990 FX -amd fx-8150 - core processor am3+ - 32G Corsair 1066 DDR3 - PNY GTX670 2g gddr5 - Corsair Force SSD 120G - Samsung 750G SATA drives - WD 1tb Black (Audio files) - WD 2TB for storage - RME UFX - USB ASIO 2/2016 drivers Win8 

     
    Without a mess, there is no message
    #16
    Guitarmech111
    Max Output Level: -24.5 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 5085
    • Joined: 2003/11/06 10:18:53
    • Location: Bayou City, TX
    • Status: offline
    RE: Mackie HDR24 Vs Alesis HD24 2004/03/16 10:52:47 (permalink)
    You did fill out the free Fireport coupon and sent it in right? Or else you will be waiting forever, Alesis are the one's you must deal with for the free Fireport it does not come with the unit just reg it on their site and fill out offer and send it in took me a few weeks though to but it was free:)


    No coupon to fill out. This is a deal I worked out with GC.

    Peace,
    Conley Shepherd
    Joyful Noise Productions
    PC config: (Win performance base score = 7.7) ASUS Sabertooth 990 FX -amd fx-8150 - core processor am3+ - 32G Corsair 1066 DDR3 - PNY GTX670 2g gddr5 - Corsair Force SSD 120G - Samsung 750G SATA drives - WD 1tb Black (Audio files) - WD 2TB for storage - RME UFX - USB ASIO 2/2016 drivers Win8 

     
    Without a mess, there is no message
    #17
    ohhey
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 11676
    • Joined: 2003/11/06 16:24:07
    • Location: Fort Worth Texas USA
    • Status: offline
    RE: Mackie HDR24 Vs Alesis HD24 2004/03/16 10:59:23 (permalink)
    ORIGINAL: jbs

    Hello
    Last year I was choosing a recorder to replace my ADAT xt and after much thinking I decided to buy the HD24. The reason behind this was
    a) driver size (no fix for using larger drives for the Mackie existed then) and most important
    b) FAT file system. As I understod it the Mackie cached about 15minutes of data then concatenated the pieces and started to cache again. If the power goes out during any point in those 15 minutes the file is corrupt and you loose up to 15 minutes. On the HD24 you loose only the very second you loose the power (I have tested it). For me doing liverecording it is a must that I do ot loose minutes if the power goes out. OK, I guess I could buy a UPS but it felt more safe using the HD24.
    Also,
    c) it is convinient to have tsr connection for all i/o.
    /Johan


    Those are very good points. A UPS would solve the 15 minute thing but the Tascam style analog I/O is a complete bummer. You HAVE to have the special cables to make it work and even then it just seems cheesey.
    #18
    ohhey
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 11676
    • Joined: 2003/11/06 16:24:07
    • Location: Fort Worth Texas USA
    • Status: offline
    RE: Mackie HDR24 Vs Alesis HD24 2004/03/16 11:00:57 (permalink)
    We will expect a full report...
    #19
    manciosax
    Max Output Level: -88 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 103
    • Joined: 2003/11/07 13:43:51
    • Status: offline
    RE: Mackie HDR24 Vs Alesis HD24 2004/03/16 13:39:58 (permalink)
    Thanks very much to everyone!!!
    I've noticed that the Alesis HD24xr can record up to 24 tracks simultaneously at 24/96 while the mackie comes with 12 tracks at 24/96, more over the mackie comes with no adat!
    I think i'll go for the Alesis.
    Any other new comment is welcome!
    Bye Mancio
    #20
    Twin Paradox
    Max Output Level: -89 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 61
    • Joined: 2004/01/26 08:42:14
    • Status: offline
    RE: Mackie HDR24 Vs Alesis HD24 2004/03/16 13:42:07 (permalink)
    ORIGINAL: manciosax


    I've noticed that the Alesis HD24xr can record up to 24 tracks simultaneously at 24/96 ... Any other new comment is welcome!
    Bye Mancio



    Not correct. When recording to the Alesis HD24 at 88.1 or 96 K sample rates you are limited to 12 tracks only.

    Twin Paradox
    #21
    manciosax
    Max Output Level: -88 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 103
    • Joined: 2003/11/07 13:43:51
    • Status: offline
    RE: Mackie HDR24 Vs Alesis HD24 2004/03/17 05:13:20 (permalink)
    Hi Twin,
    the HD24xr (not HD24) can record up to 24 tracks at 24/96. The HD24xr has a built in upgrade (EC-2). Alesis told me that old HD24 can upgrade! New buyers who want full 24 tracks at 24/96 should buy the HD24xr. Price euro 2400 (i think 2800 dollars).
    Any comments on the converters?!?!?!
    Bye and thanks again!!!!
    Mancio
    #22
    Twin Paradox
    Max Output Level: -89 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 61
    • Joined: 2004/01/26 08:42:14
    • Status: offline
    RE: Mackie HDR24 Vs Alesis HD24 2004/03/17 08:24:55 (permalink)
    Macio -

    I think there's some confusion caused by the less than clear advertising descriptions of the high sample rate capabilities of the HD24 XR (which, as you note, has the built in EC-2 that can also be purchased separately and installed on the original HD24).

    As a side note, the orignal HD24 also can record and play back at 88.2/96 sample rates, but only via the ADAT i/o. The EC-2 board expands that to analog i/o at 88.2/96.

    However, it is limited to 12 tracks at the higher sample rates.

    Take a look at the article at this site:

    http://www.alesis.com/news/reviews/1927.PAR.Alesisarticle.pdf

    It's a review of the HD24 with the EC-2 updgrade, and it describes on the second page how it is limited to 12 tracks at 88.2 or 96K rates.

    You can also go to the Alesis website for downloading manuals:

    http://www.alesis.com/downloads/ftp/ftp_images.htm

    Look at the one for the HD24XR. See page A6 which also describes the 12 track limitation for 88.2/96.

    Unless something has changed very, very recently, I believe the info that you got from someone at Alesis is, like some of their advertising, not exactly consistent with the details printed elsewhere. I would take this info back to whomever you spoke with at Alesis and get it clarified.

    Twin Paradox
    #23
    manciosax
    Max Output Level: -88 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 103
    • Joined: 2003/11/07 13:43:51
    • Status: offline
    RE: Mackie HDR24 Vs Alesis HD24 2004/03/17 11:09:59 (permalink)
    Hi twin,
    your notes were so helpful!!!!!!!!
    You are right! After having read carefully the manual i got the right info!
    The EC-2 improves the sample rate but the tracks involved are only 12!
    Just to be sure i've called the italian dealer of Alesis and he answered to call tomorrow for tech details.

    So in the end i'm going to have the same problem!
    How can i Record at least 16 tracks at 24/96?
    Do i have to buy a MOTU 24i?
    Is there any other solution?

    Thanks
    Maurizio
    #24
    manciosax
    Max Output Level: -88 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 103
    • Joined: 2003/11/07 13:43:51
    • Status: offline
    RE: Mackie HDR24 Vs Alesis HD24 2004/04/16 03:35:21 (permalink)
    Hallo Friends,
    i've got the last important question before buying the HD24.
    Here's my question: is it possible to record from the analog IN and in realtime to monitor from the digital OUT.
    Thans!!!!!
    Mancio
    #25
    Twin Paradox
    Max Output Level: -89 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 61
    • Joined: 2004/01/26 08:42:14
    • Status: offline
    RE: Mackie HDR24 Vs Alesis HD24 2004/04/16 05:12:26 (permalink)
    Yes. Both the analog outs and digital outs are active regardless of the input source.

    Twin Paradox
    #26
    althemusicwizard
    Max Output Level: -89 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 83
    • Joined: 2004/02/10 04:14:10
    • Status: offline
    RE: Mackie HDR24 Vs Alesis HD24 2004/04/18 04:17:40 (permalink)
    If you're using the HD24 in a live situation, what's the maximum recording time you can achieve?

    I know it depends on size of drive, but what I'm getting at, is say you were booked to record an all day festival, is there a way of 'continuous recording' (ie swopping drives etc) or do you at some point have to stop (because of partition size etc).

    Cheers,

    Al
    #27
    Twin Paradox
    Max Output Level: -89 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 61
    • Joined: 2004/01/26 08:42:14
    • Status: offline
    RE: Mackie HDR24 Vs Alesis HD24 2004/04/18 13:18:29 (permalink)
    Al -

    You do have to stop recording when you switch drives, even when both are loaded into the machine at the same time. The time is minimal -- you basically hit stop, select the other drive, enable recording on the tracks you want, push record and go. Even with 24 tracks it can't be more than 30 seconds, 60 tops.

    As you note, how much you can record does depend on disc size but also on sample rate and number of tracks. The manual claims that a 20 GB drive will get you about 90 minutes of 24 tracks at the 24/48K sample rate setting. So probably about 98 minutes at 24/44.1K. So if you want to record all day -- let's say 12 hours non-stop of 24 tracks at 24/44.1 you need a 160 GB hard drive (that gives you about 13 hours actually). Of course if you are recording fewer than 24 tracks, you can get more on it.

    HOWEVER -- Keep in mind that if you are planning to transfer these megamonster size tracks later for editing you are going to have to cut them up and copy them to the other disk because of the inherent 2 GB wav file size limit that Windows has. I'd recommend just taking that 30-60 second break between performers to start a new song or switch to a new disk. It's a lot less work in the long run than cutting and copying really big files like that.

    Twin Paradox
    #28
    althemusicwizard
    Max Output Level: -89 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 83
    • Joined: 2004/02/10 04:14:10
    • Status: offline
    RE: Mackie HDR24 Vs Alesis HD24 2004/04/18 16:53:12 (permalink)
    Cheers Twin.

    Al
    #29
    Jump to:
    © 2026 APG vNext Commercial Version 5.1