Helpful ReplyMastering in Sonar

Author
razor
Max Output Level: -59.5 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 1557
  • Joined: 2004/05/10 16:53:27
  • Location: Irvine, CA
  • Status: offline
2018/09/24 21:32:14 (permalink)

Mastering in Sonar

Hey Group--
 
Although I've been using Sonar for decades, I've never mastered with it. I have Sound Forge and Wavelab and never saw the need. I just read this Sound on Sound article on mastering in Sonar, and I only have one track to master, so I'm going to give it a try.
 
Anything you want to add or subtract from this article, I'm all ears! 

Stephen Davis
 
Cakewalk by Bandlab
Windows 7 Pro 64-Bit
ADK DAW - (out of business 2018)
Intel i7 4930K CPU
Core i7 SB-E MOBO
16 GB DDR3 RAM
7 TB Storage
Layla 3G SoundCard (11.5 ms Roundtrip Latency)
UAD-2 DSP
WaveLab 8 Pro 64-bit 
Sound Forge 10 Pro
#1
Anderton
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 14070
  • Joined: 2003/11/06 14:02:03
  • Status: offline
Re: Mastering in Sonar 2018/09/25 02:06:27 (permalink) ☄ Helpfulby razor 2018/09/25 02:33:58
Where it really makes a difference is when you're assembling an album that goes beyond the whole Red Book "individual cuts with two seconds between cuts" protocol.
 
A lot of what I do involves crossfades and adding, for example, a sound effect or two. I'm finishing up my 2018 project, "Joie de Vivre," which is an attempt at re-inventing EDM by cross-pollinating it with rock. Five songs are done, but they're meant to be part of a continuous DJ-style set. So the finished mixes are in CbB, but the transitions aren't done - so I'm taking advantage of CbB's multitrack nature to create the transitions around the finished songs. (I suppose I could use Wavelab's Montage feature, but that's not as flexible as a multitrack editing program.)
 
So ultimately, the project may have dozens of tracks with effects and loops creating the transitions between the various songs. After that's done, I'll bounce it as one long file, import it into Studio One, slice the file up into cuts, add the PQ codes, use SO's analytics to make sure is well, then export as the finished, mastered file.
 
Mastering isn't what it used to be in the days of vinyl. I often find myself bouncing among programs to produce a finished master. Just being able to do automation in CbB when mastering can be a big deal to me.

The first 3 books in "The Musician's Guide to Home Recording" series are available from Hal Leonard and http://www.reverb.com. Listen to my music on http://www.YouTube.com/thecraiganderton, and visit http://www.craiganderton.com. Thanks!
#2
razor
Max Output Level: -59.5 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 1557
  • Joined: 2004/05/10 16:53:27
  • Location: Irvine, CA
  • Status: offline
Re: Mastering in Sonar 2018/09/25 02:36:43 (permalink)
Hey Anderton
 
Thanks for the real life example. Although I've used Sonar for mixing forever, using it for mastering is turning out to  have a learning curve for me that I'm going to have to get used to, I guess.
 
I think I'll do a master in Sonar and then another in Wavelab and see which I like best, as far as a finished product is concerned. You can never have too many tools -- or can you!? :-o

Stephen Davis
 
Cakewalk by Bandlab
Windows 7 Pro 64-Bit
ADK DAW - (out of business 2018)
Intel i7 4930K CPU
Core i7 SB-E MOBO
16 GB DDR3 RAM
7 TB Storage
Layla 3G SoundCard (11.5 ms Roundtrip Latency)
UAD-2 DSP
WaveLab 8 Pro 64-bit 
Sound Forge 10 Pro
#3
Audioicon
Max Output Level: -84 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 349
  • Joined: 2016/06/13 23:25:25
  • Status: offline
Re: Mastering in Sonar 2018/09/25 06:31:19 (permalink) ☄ Helpfulby razor 2018/09/25 15:30:15
razor
Hey Anderton
 
Thanks for the real life example. Although I've used Sonar for mixing forever, using it for mastering is turning out to  have a learning curve for me that I'm going to have to get used to, I guess.
 
I think I'll do a master in Sonar and then another in Wavelab and see which I like best, as far as a finished product is concerned. You can never have too many tools -- or can you!? :-o


I spend very little time on Mastering given that the focus is always on the mix. For me Mastering has become a two part process.

Making the mix appropriately loud and a getting a nice fade. I used Tape Saturation and Compressor and a sculpting EQ on the Main BUS, so it's already sounding the way I need it.

I should point out that my music style is very conventional and so this process may not work if you are doing some complex stuff.

Get a clean, warm and cohesive mix and the mastering is like adding icing on the cake.

Checkout my new song: Playing on YouTube: EUPHORIA.
#4
Anderton
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 14070
  • Joined: 2003/11/06 14:02:03
  • Status: offline
Re: Mastering in Sonar 2018/09/25 19:00:05 (permalink)
Audioicon
I spend very little time on Mastering given that the focus is always on the mix. For me Mastering has become a two part process. [snip] Get a clean, warm and cohesive mix and the mastering is like adding icing on the cake.



Yes! If you get a good balance when you mix, then mastering can only make it better. Maybe 5% better, but still, better. (I know you've heard Simplicity - the mastering for that was extremely basic, because the songs were simple enough to "mix themselves").
 
However, I come from the "old school" definition of mastering which also includes album assembly (I know, it's a singles world, nobody does albums any more, etc.). Album assembly is an art unto itself that's different from using mastering to enhance a mix. What I described above is more about assembly, and a multitrack DAW can be an incredible tool for album assembly, while also being able to tweak dynamics and EQ for individual cuts.  

The first 3 books in "The Musician's Guide to Home Recording" series are available from Hal Leonard and http://www.reverb.com. Listen to my music on http://www.YouTube.com/thecraiganderton, and visit http://www.craiganderton.com. Thanks!
#5
Audioicon
Max Output Level: -84 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 349
  • Joined: 2016/06/13 23:25:25
  • Status: offline
Re: Mastering in Sonar 2018/09/25 19:29:29 (permalink)
Anderton
However, I come from the "old school" definition of mastering which also includes album assembly (I know, it's a singles world, nobody does albums any more, etc.). Album assembly is an art unto itself that's different from using mastering to enhance a mix. What I described above is more about assembly, and a multitrack DAW can be an incredible tool for album assembly, while also being able to tweak dynamics and EQ for individual cuts.  


True, I have heard some really cool stuff and I am always asking myself as to how or when it was assembled, was it part of the song or was it part of the Mastering process. 

One of the styles I have seen is the cross-fade of tracks, but yet these are individual songs or, intros that flows into other tacks but are in themselves separate tracks. Other times I have heard different effects added and you can tell they were not part of the original song or the original was mixed then placed through some serious creative process. The best I have heard is when you have no idea where you are on the CD track list, it becomes a fascinating listening experience.

Maybe I am at a distance but I have been noticing less and less creativity at the Mastering stage, especially given the cultural of immediacy. For example: Not related but to make a point, NetFlix has a "Skip Intro Feature."
And I watched the Crown, I just love the opening Theme. There is something about the music that makes me feel I am floating on air, I would have not experienced this if I had skipped the intro.

I am nowhere near the stuff you described above but I love to hear others do it, I think the reason is, I simply just make one song at a time.

Excited to hear your finished product.




Checkout my new song: Playing on YouTube: EUPHORIA.
#6
Anderton
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 14070
  • Joined: 2003/11/06 14:02:03
  • Status: offline
Re: Mastering in Sonar 2018/09/26 03:00:47 (permalink)
Audioicon
Maybe I am at a distance but I have been noticing less and less creativity at the Mastering stage, especially given the cultural of immediacy.



You are correct. Mastering used to be considered the last stop in the creative and technical process, not just the technical process. Back in the day when mastering I would often shorten songs, lengthen intros, add overdubs, kick up the intro +3 dB...whatever it took. That's just not the way people think any more.

The first 3 books in "The Musician's Guide to Home Recording" series are available from Hal Leonard and http://www.reverb.com. Listen to my music on http://www.YouTube.com/thecraiganderton, and visit http://www.craiganderton.com. Thanks!
#7
razor
Max Output Level: -59.5 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 1557
  • Joined: 2004/05/10 16:53:27
  • Location: Irvine, CA
  • Status: offline
Re: Mastering in Sonar 2018/09/26 21:37:27 (permalink)
I actually ended up pulling my Cakewalk mastered track into Wavelab after all. Mostly because it has the analysis tools I like, then after I saw a couple areas for improvement, it didn't make sense to jump back and forth between CW and WL to finish the track.
 
I think I'll still use the CW mastering method described in the SoS article I posted to get my mixes better prepped for mastering, but I feel like I have more control of the process, and more functionality in WL. IMO.
 
I will admit, after applying the mastering techniques in CW that are described in the article, my time spent mastering in WL was lot less than I typically spend.

Stephen Davis
 
Cakewalk by Bandlab
Windows 7 Pro 64-Bit
ADK DAW - (out of business 2018)
Intel i7 4930K CPU
Core i7 SB-E MOBO
16 GB DDR3 RAM
7 TB Storage
Layla 3G SoundCard (11.5 ms Roundtrip Latency)
UAD-2 DSP
WaveLab 8 Pro 64-bit 
Sound Forge 10 Pro
#8
Anderton
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 14070
  • Joined: 2003/11/06 14:02:03
  • Status: offline
Re: Mastering in Sonar 2018/09/27 04:09:37 (permalink)
razor
I actually ended up pulling my Cakewalk mastered track into Wavelab after all. Mostly because it has the analysis tools I like, then after I saw a couple areas for improvement, it didn't make sense to jump back and forth between CW and WL to finish the track.
 
I think I'll still use the CW mastering method described in the SoS article I posted to get my mixes better prepped for mastering, but I feel like I have more control of the process, and more functionality in WL. IMO.
 
I will admit, after applying the mastering techniques in CW that are described in the article, my time spent mastering in WL was lot less than I typically spend.



Exactly!! Use each program for what it does best. I do find CW's analysis tools lacking, but when I put the final mixer/mastering album into Studio One to use its analytics, I can do a final reality check.
 
I use Wavelab and Sound Forge for "wav surgery," for which they excel, as opposed to album assembly - for which they don't 
 
We're very, very fortunate to have these incredibly rich tools at our disposal. The recording gear I used in the 60s and 70s looks antediluvian compared to what we have now. I'm extremely happy with music technology. I can do things I only could dream of in the past. Now they're reality.
 

The first 3 books in "The Musician's Guide to Home Recording" series are available from Hal Leonard and http://www.reverb.com. Listen to my music on http://www.YouTube.com/thecraiganderton, and visit http://www.craiganderton.com. Thanks!
#9
chuckebaby
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 13146
  • Joined: 2011/01/04 14:55:28
  • Status: offline
Re: Mastering in Sonar 2018/09/28 16:37:42 (permalink)
I really liked this article Craig.
I do things a little bit differently but still along the same lines.
Great job.

Windows 8.1 X64 Sonar Platinum x64
Custom built: Asrock z97 1150 - Intel I7 4790k - 16GB corsair DDR3 1600 - PNY SSD 220GB
Focusrite Saffire 18I8 - Mackie Control
   
#10
Starise
Max Output Level: -0.3 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 7563
  • Joined: 2007/04/07 17:23:02
  • Status: offline
Re: Mastering in Sonar 2018/09/28 23:55:59 (permalink)
I am finding that even in Studio one I need additional plugins the get the kind of master I want. The plugins in SO are ok. That's what many regular SO users tell me. A lot of this is subjective. 
Most will say it is possible to get a decent master in ( take your pick of daw) with the included tools. The same people who say that don't use only the stock plugins in their masters.
 
The only real difference between SO and CbB in terms of mastering is that SO has  album assembly, track diagnostics and tag section. The plugins in SO aren't all mastering grade depending on the situation. Unless you're ok with "ok".

Intel 5820K O.C. 4.4ghz, ASRock Extreme 4 LGA 2011-v3, 16 gig DDR4, ,
3 x Samsung SATA III 500gb SSD, 2X 1 Samsung 1tb 7200rpm outboard, Win 10 64bit, 
Laptop HP Omen i7 16gb 2/sdd with Focusrite interface.
 CbB, Studio One 4 Pro, Mixcraft 8, Ableton Live 10 
 
 www.soundcloud.com/starise
 
 
 
Twitter @Rodein
 
#11
bitflipper
01100010 01101001 01110100 01100110 01101100 01101
  • Total Posts : 26036
  • Joined: 2006/09/17 11:23:23
  • Location: Everett, WA USA
  • Status: offline
Re: Mastering in Sonar 2018/09/29 02:49:12 (permalink)
Anderton
 
...I do find CW's analysis tools lacking, but when I put the final mixer/mastering album into Studio One to use its analytics, I can do a final reality check.

I think it's a fair assumption that anybody who's serious about doing their own mastering has acquired the necessary third-party analytic tools to allow you to master in whatever DAW you're comfortable with. 
 
I feel no limitations at all when mastering a CD project in Cakewalk. Well, maybe just one: if you could insert indexes and then write an iso image directly from Cakewalk, that would be pretty cool. Does Studio One do that?
 


All else is in doubt, so this is the truth I cling to. 

My Stuff
#12
Anderton
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 14070
  • Joined: 2003/11/06 14:02:03
  • Status: offline
Re: Mastering in Sonar 2018/09/29 03:25:54 (permalink)
bitflipper
Anderton
 
...I do find CW's analysis tools lacking, but when I put the final mixer/mastering album into Studio One to use its analytics, I can do a final reality check.

I think it's a fair assumption that anybody who's serious about doing their own mastering has acquired the necessary third-party analytic tools to allow you to master in whatever DAW you're comfortable with. 
 
I feel no limitations at all when mastering a CD project in Cakewalk. Well, maybe just one: if you could insert indexes and then write an iso image directly from Cakewalk, that would be pretty cool. Does Studio One do that?
 



Studio One's mastering page (which is functionally separate from the multitrack song page, aside from the song/project linkage that's unique to Studio One) basically replaces a program like what was Sony's CD Architect, not a program like CbB. It's an entirely different animal from mastering in a DAW; you can insert P and Q codes, export in multiple data formats, do CD-text, create disk images, and perhaps most importantly, both export and import DDP files. Not a lot of programs can import DDP data, but sometimes you'll need to edit a master's metadata.
 
Also mastering analytics are a moving target. Studio One was quick to adopt flexible LUFS metering (as well as Bob Katz's metering). By the time you've bought all the required analysis tools, you might as well just pop for SO so you can do album assembly and DDP exports.
 
However, it can't do the deep waveform surgery that a program like WaveLab or Sound Forge can do. I use those for the "tough" cases.
 
I have no problem mentioning SO here in this context, because CbB doesn't compete with SO in respect to the mastering page, any more than CbB competes with Vegas because CbB has a video player screen. And for DJ mix-type stuff, SO's mastering page isn't anywhere near as flexible as doing album assembly in CbB (nor is Wavelab's "multitrack" Montage feature). Right tool for the right job...

The first 3 books in "The Musician's Guide to Home Recording" series are available from Hal Leonard and http://www.reverb.com. Listen to my music on http://www.YouTube.com/thecraiganderton, and visit http://www.craiganderton.com. Thanks!
#13
Steve_Karl
Max Output Level: -50 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 2534
  • Joined: 2003/11/06 20:53:26
  • Location: Pittsburgh, PA USA
  • Status: offline
Re: Mastering in Sonar 2018/10/01 16:15:46 (permalink)
Anderton
Where it really makes a difference is when you're assembling an album that goes beyond the whole Red Book "individual cuts with two seconds between cuts" protocol.
 



As far as I know Red Book only requires 2 seconds to the beginning of the first track marker.
All others above the first can be anywhere from zero to whatever.
At least that's how CD Architect works.

Steve Karl
https://soundcloud.com/steve_karl
SPLAT 2017.01
#14
Anderton
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 14070
  • Joined: 2003/11/06 14:02:03
  • Status: offline
Re: Mastering in Sonar 2018/10/02 05:15:52 (permalink)
Steve_Karl
Anderton
Where it really makes a difference is when you're assembling an album that goes beyond the whole Red Book "individual cuts with two seconds between cuts" protocol.
 



As far as I know Red Book only requires 2 seconds to the beginning of the first track marker.
All others above the first can be anywhere from zero to whatever.
At least that's how CD Architect works.



The only required pregap is indeed 2 seconds before Index 01, although it's also possible "hide" a track between 0 and index 01 (but people have to know it's there - you need to hit play, then rewind immediately, and not all CD drives can read this).
 
However, consumer burning software defaults to two seconds between tracks because that's recommended, albeit not required. They can't change this because you can't place your own PQ codes, as you can with professional CD creation programs like Wavelab, Sound Forge, Studio One, etc.

The first 3 books in "The Musician's Guide to Home Recording" series are available from Hal Leonard and http://www.reverb.com. Listen to my music on http://www.YouTube.com/thecraiganderton, and visit http://www.craiganderton.com. Thanks!
#15
Jump to:
© 2024 APG vNext Commercial Version 5.1