revnice1
Max Output Level: -69 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1082
- Joined: 2007/09/21 14:43:56
- Status: offline
Meter question
On my Master Bus, I've changed the meter to RMS Peak but I don't understand the peak. Normally, Peak briefly holds the highest value reached before either falling or disappearing but with RMS Peak, the peak is always about 10 db or more higher than the highest value shown on the meter. Why? Thanks - rev
|
ampfixer
Max Output Level: -20 dBFS
- Total Posts : 5508
- Joined: 2010/12/12 20:11:50
- Location: Ontario
- Status: offline
Re: Meter question
2015/05/31 20:03:10
(permalink)
It sounds like you've selected the "lock peaks" option and not just the "hold peaks" option. Give it a look because I set up my meters the way you describe so I can see all the peaks after playback and adjust as needed.
Regards, John I want to make it clear that I am an Eedjit. I have no direct, or indirect, knowledge of business, the music industry, forum threads or the meaning of life. I know about amps. WIN 10 Pro X64, I7-3770k 16 gigs, ASUS Z77 pro, AMD 7950 3 gig, Steinberg UR44, A-Pro 500, Sonar Platinum, KRK Rokit 6
|
revnice1
Max Output Level: -69 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1082
- Joined: 2007/09/21 14:43:56
- Status: offline
Re: Meter question
2015/05/31 20:51:38
(permalink)
Normally (for example) the meter might reach -12 and as it falls away it leaves a peak marker at -12. Hold Peaks, as I understand it, should briefly hold the peak before it falls or disappears. Lock Peaks should continue to display the peak at all times. But on both those options, the meter might be at -12 and the peak is well into the red all the time. That's the part I don't understand, where is the real peak? Why is the peak indicator in the red when the meter never goes there?
|
tlw
Max Output Level: -49.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 2567
- Joined: 2008/10/11 22:06:32
- Location: West Midlands, UK
- Status: offline
Re: Meter question
2015/05/31 20:57:23
(permalink)
When set to display RMS and peak the main body of the meter display (the coloured band) shows RMS volume. The little line bobbing around a few (or more) dB above it is the peak indicator. It is quite possible for the (transient) peaks to go into the red while the RMS display is well below it. Does that help?
Sonar Platinum 64bit, Windows 8.1 Pro 64bit, I7 3770K Ivybridge, 16GB Ram, Gigabyte Z77-D3H m/board, ATI 7750 graphics+ 1GB RAM, 2xIntel 520 series 220GB SSDs, 1 TB Samsung F3 + 1 TB WD HDDs, Seasonic fanless 460W psu, RME Fireface UFX, Focusrite Octopre. Assorted real synths, guitars, mandolins, diatonic accordions, percussion, fx and other stuff.
|
revnice1
Max Output Level: -69 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1082
- Joined: 2007/09/21 14:43:56
- Status: offline
Re: Meter question
2015/05/31 23:43:09
(permalink)
Yes, that actually does help because it tells me that I probably have transient peaks that should be squashed.
|
mudgel
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 12010
- Joined: 2004/08/13 00:56:05
- Location: Linton Victoria (Near Ballarat)
- Status: offline
Re: Meter question
2015/05/31 23:43:43
(permalink)
Mike V. (MUDGEL) STUDIO: Win 10 Pro x64, SPlat & CbB x64, PC: ASUS Z370-A, INTEL i7 8700k, 32GIG DDR4 2400, OC 4.7Ghz. Storage: 7 TB SATA III, 750GiG SSD & Samsung 500 Gig 960 EVO NVMe M.2. Monitors: Adam A7X, JBL 10” Sub. Audio I/O & DSP Server: DIGIGRID IOS & IOX. Screen: Raven MTi + 43" HD 4K TV Monitor. Keyboard Controller: Native Instruments Komplete Kontrol S88.
|
revnice1
Max Output Level: -69 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1082
- Joined: 2007/09/21 14:43:56
- Status: offline
Re: Meter question
2015/05/31 23:46:18
(permalink)
|
scook
Forum Host
- Total Posts : 24146
- Joined: 2005/07/27 13:43:57
- Location: TX
- Status: offline
Re: Meter question
2015/05/31 23:49:04
(permalink)
The link works for me in Win7, FireFox 38.0.1 Although for the current version of SONAR, pretty sure meters have not changed since 8.5
|
mudgel
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 12010
- Joined: 2004/08/13 00:56:05
- Location: Linton Victoria (Near Ballarat)
- Status: offline
Re: Meter question
2015/05/31 23:50:00
(permalink)
I've just checked using the latest ni in your post. I was editing a typo in my post maybe that was the problem. Want to try it again. Thanks.
Mike V. (MUDGEL) STUDIO: Win 10 Pro x64, SPlat & CbB x64, PC: ASUS Z370-A, INTEL i7 8700k, 32GIG DDR4 2400, OC 4.7Ghz. Storage: 7 TB SATA III, 750GiG SSD & Samsung 500 Gig 960 EVO NVMe M.2. Monitors: Adam A7X, JBL 10” Sub. Audio I/O & DSP Server: DIGIGRID IOS & IOX. Screen: Raven MTi + 43" HD 4K TV Monitor. Keyboard Controller: Native Instruments Komplete Kontrol S88.
|
revnice1
Max Output Level: -69 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1082
- Joined: 2007/09/21 14:43:56
- Status: offline
Re: Meter question
2015/06/01 10:43:19
(permalink)
OK, the link worked for me this time. So assuming I have consistent peaks well above the RMS, how would I set about finding them and squashing them? I have a couple of Multiband Compressors. Would Cakewalk analyst be of any use?
|
slartabartfast
Max Output Level: -22.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 5289
- Joined: 2005/10/30 01:38:34
- Status: offline
Re: Meter question
2015/06/01 11:52:02
(permalink)
RMS stands for root mean square. You can think of it as a weighted average of the signal strength over a period. Because it is "averaging," the peaks (single highest value) is always expected to be higher than the RMS over a long enough period.
post edited by slartabartfast - 2015/06/01 11:59:37
|
revnice1
Max Output Level: -69 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1082
- Joined: 2007/09/21 14:43:56
- Status: offline
Re: Meter question
2015/06/02 12:07:22
(permalink)
>(single highest value) is always expected to be higher than the RMS over a long enough period. Makes perfect sense except I can put a brickwall limiter in that bus and crush everything to death and I still a big difference between the RMS and the peaks. Here's a pic: http://tinypic.com/r/2m85kir/8As you can see, I'm crushing the track pretty seriously but down at the very bottom you can see the peak in the red and the RMS 30 or more db below it. When I'm crushing the whole track, where is that mysterious peak coming from and why is the difference so huge? There is nothing special about the track, it has bass drums and a vocal and the mix is reasonable.
post edited by revnice1 - 2015/06/02 12:36:58
|
reginaldStjohn
Max Output Level: -81 dBFS
- Total Posts : 485
- Joined: 2011/01/15 23:42:50
- Status: offline
Re: Meter question
2015/06/02 15:48:00
(permalink)
The only time you really can get the peaks and the rms value to be the same would be a DC (0 Hz) signal. Any other signal will have peaks that are higher than the RMS value. A pure sine wave should have an RMS value that is about .7 times lower than the peak value (-3dB). So I would expect that any signal that contains more than one frequency would have even a higher difference between RMS and peak. Even if you limit or compress the signal the RMS and Peak values will always show some difference. In addition unless you use a fast brickwall type limiter some signal can get through at the beginning of a transient. In your picture you have a compressor with 3ms attack time. This attack time allows some of the initial sound to get through the compressor and can actually make the peak to RMS difference larger because part of the peak gets through but then the rest of the sound is compressed. There is nothing wrong with having peaks, that is part of what gives sound its timbre and dynamics. You just want the peaks not to clip when leaving your master buss.
AMD Phenom II x6, 8 GB Ram, 2 Internal SATA III HD Windows 10 Presonus Studio Live 16.0.2 Interface/Mixer Cakewalk Sonar Platinum Line6 Helix Guitar Processor Custom Made (El Bandito) Telecaster LTD ESP EC-1000 PRS El Torrero SE
|
revnice1
Max Output Level: -69 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1082
- Joined: 2007/09/21 14:43:56
- Status: offline
Re: Meter question
2015/06/03 11:00:09
(permalink)
Good point about the attack time, I hadn't thought of that. >You just want the peaks not to clip when leaving your master buss. That's where I'm puzzled. How do I get the RMS up, so I have a decent level, and yet bring the peaks down so they're not in the red all the time?
|